e424b4
Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4)
Registration No.
333-163228
10,000,000 Shares
Common
Stock
This is the initial
public offering of our common stock. Prior to this offering,
there has been no public market for our common stock. The
initial public offering price of our common stock is $15.00 per
share.
Our common stock has
been approved for listing on The NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol QNST.
The underwriters
have an option to purchase a maximum of 1,500,000 additional
shares of common stock from us to cover over-allotments, if any.
Investing in our
common stock involves risks. See Risk Factors
beginning on page 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price to
|
|
|
Discounts and
|
|
|
Proceeds,
Before
|
|
|
|
Public
|
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
Expenses, to
us
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
13.95
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
150,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
139,500,000
|
|
The underwriters
have agreed to reimburse us for a portion of our out-of-pocket
expenses.
Delivery of our
shares of common stock will be made on or about
February 17, 2010.
Neither the
Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or
determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
|
Credit
Suisse |
BofA Merrill Lynch |
J.P. Morgan |
The date of this
prospectus is February 10, 2010.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus or contained in any free writing prospectus filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Neither we
nor the underwriters have authorized anyone to provide you with
additional information or information different from that
contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus
filed with the SEC. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers
to buy, our common stock only in jurisdictions where such offers
and sales are permitted. The information contained in this
prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus,
regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any
sale of our common stock.
For investors outside of the United States: Neither we nor the
underwriters have done anything that would permit this offering
or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any
jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. Persons
outside the United States who come into possession of this
prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any
restrictions relating to, the offering of the shares of common
stock and the distribution of this prospectus outside of the
United States.
Until March 7, 2010 (25 days after commencement of this
offering), all dealers that buy, sell or trade our common stock,
whether or not participating in this offering, may be required
to deliver a prospectus. This delivery requirement is in
addition to the obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus
when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold
allotments or subscriptions.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus and does not contain all of the information that
you should consider in making your investment decision. Before
investing in our common stock, you should carefully read this
entire prospectus, including our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes and the information set forth
under the headings Risk Factors and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, in each case included
elsewhere in this prospectus. Unless the context otherwise
requires, we use the terms QuinStreet,
company, we, us and
our in this prospectus to refer to QuinStreet, Inc.
and, where appropriate, its subsidiaries.
QUINSTREET,
INC.
Overview
QuinStreet is a leader in vertical marketing and media on the
Internet. Vertical marketing and media are focused on matching
targeted segments of visitors with groupings of clients and
product offerings of probable interest to them. Vertical visitor
segments are defined by factors such as life stage, life events,
income, career status, and expressed intent to buy or research a
particular product. This approach is in contrast to marketing
and media that are focused on general consumer interests and
mass market audiences. We have built a strong set of
capabilities to engage Internet visitors with targeted media and
to connect our marketing clients with their potential customers
online. We focus on serving clients in large,
information-intensive industry categories, or verticals, where
relevant, targeted media and offerings help visitors make
informed choices, find the products that match their needs, and
thus become qualified customer prospects for our clients. Our
current primary client verticals are the education and financial
services industries. We also have a presence in the home
services,
business-to-business,
or B2B, and healthcare industries.
We generate revenue by delivering measurable online marketing
results to our clients. These results are typically in the form
of qualified leads or clicks, the outcomes of customer prospects
submitting requests for information on, or to be contacted
regarding, client products, or their clicking on or through to
specific client offers. These qualified leads or clicks are
generated from our marketing activities on our websites or on
third-party websites with whom we have relationships. Clients
primarily pay us for leads that they can convert into customers,
typically in a call center or through other offline customer
acquisition processes, or for clicks from our websites that they
can convert into applications or customers on their websites. We
are predominantly paid on a negotiated or market-driven
per lead or per click basis. Media costs
to generate qualified leads or clicks are borne by us as a cost
of providing our services.
Founded in 1999, we have been a pioneer in the development and
application of measurable marketing on the Internet. Clients pay
us for the actual opt-in actions by prospects or customers that
result from our marketing activities on their behalf, versus
traditional impression-based advertising and marketing models in
which an advertiser pays for more general exposure to an
advertisement. We have been particularly focused on developing
and delivering measurable marketing results in the search engine
ecosystem, the entry point of the Internet for most
of the visitors we convert into qualified leads or clicks for
our clients. We own or partner with vertical content websites
that attract Internet visitors from organic search engine
rankings due to the quality and relevancy of their content to
search engine users. We also acquire targeted visitors for our
websites through the purchase of
pay-per-click,
or PPC, advertisements on search engines. We complement search
engine companies by building websites with content and offerings
that are relevant and responsive to their searchers, and by
increasing the value of the PPC search advertising they sell by
matching visitors with offerings and converting them into
customer prospects for our clients.
Market
Opportunity
Our clients are shifting more of their marketing budgets from
traditional media channels such as direct mail, television,
radio, and newspapers to the Internet because of increasing
usage of the Internet by their potential customers. We believe
that direct marketing is the most applicable and relevant
marketing segment to us because it is targeted and measurable.
According to the July 2009 research report, Consumer
Behavior Online: A 2009 Deep Dive, by Forrester Research,
Americans spend 33% of their time with media on the
1
Internet, but online direct marketing was forecasted to
represent only 16% of the $149 billion in total annual
U.S. direct marketing spending in 2009, as reported by the
Direct Marketing Association. The Internet is an effective
direct marketing medium due to its targeting and measurability
characteristics. If direct marketing budgets shift to the
Internet in proportion to Americans share of time spent
with media on the Internet from 16% to 33% of the
$149 billion in total spending in 2009 that
could represent an increased market opportunity of
$25 billion. In addition, as traditional media categories
such as television and radio shift from analog to digital
formats, they then become channels for the targeted and
measurable marketing techniques and capabilities we have
developed for the Internet, thus expanding our addressable
market opportunity. Further future market potential may also
come from international markets.
Our
Business Model
We deliver cost-effective marketing results to our clients,
predictably and scalably, most typically in the form of a
qualified lead or click. These leads or clicks can then convert
into a customer or sale for the client at a rate that results in
an acceptable marketing cost to them. We get paid by clients
primarily when we deliver qualified leads or clicks as defined
in our agreements with them. Because we bear the costs of media,
our programs must deliver a value to our clients and a media
yield, or our ability to generate an acceptable margin on our
media costs, that provides a sound financial outcome for us. Our
general process is:
|
|
|
|
|
We own or access targeted media.
|
|
|
|
We run advertisements or other forms of marketing messages and
programs in that media to create visitor responses or clicks
through to client offerings.
|
|
|
|
We match these responses or clicks to client offerings or brands
that meet visitor interests or needs, converting visitors into
qualified leads or clicks.
|
|
|
|
We optimize client matches and media yield such that we achieve
desired results for clients and a sound financial outcome for us.
|
Our
Competitive Advantages
Our competitive advantages include:
|
|
|
|
|
Vertical focus and expertise
|
|
|
|
Measurable marketing experience and expertise
|
|
|
|
Targeted media
|
|
|
|
Proprietary technology
|
|
|
|
Client relationships
|
|
|
|
Client-driven online marketing approach
|
|
|
|
Acquisition strategy and success
|
|
|
|
Scale
|
Our
Strategy
We believe that we are in the early stages of a very large and
long-term business opportunity. Our strategy for pursuing this
opportunity includes the following key components:
|
|
|
|
|
Focus on generating sustainable revenues by providing measurable
value to our clients.
|
|
|
|
Build QuinStreet and our industry sustainably by behaving
ethically in all we do and by providing quality content and
website experiences to Internet visitors.
|
|
|
|
Remain vertically focused, choosing to grow through depth,
expertise and coverage in our current industry verticals; enter
new verticals selectively over time, organically and through
acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
Build a world class organization, with
best-in-class
capabilities for delivering measurable marketing results to
clients and high yields or returns on media costs.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Develop and evolve the best technologies and platform for
managing vertical marketing and media on the Internet; focus on
technologies that enhance media yield, improve client results
and achieve scale efficiencies.
|
|
|
|
Build, buy and partner with vertical content websites that
provide the most relevant and highest quality visitor
experiences in the client and media verticals we serve.
|
|
|
|
Be a client-driven organization; develop a broad set of media
sources and capabilities to reliably meet client needs.
|
Risks
Associated with Our Business
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties,
including those highlighted in the section entitled Risk
Factors immediately following this prospectus summary,
that primarily represent challenges we face in connection with
the successful implementation of our strategy and the growth of
our business. We operate in an immature industry and have a
rapidly-evolving business model, which make it difficult to
predict our future operating results. In addition, we expect a
number of factors to cause our operating results to fluctuate on
a quarterly and annual basis, which may make it difficult to
predict our future performance.
Corporate
Information
We incorporated in California in April 1999. We reincorporated
in Delaware in December 2009. Our principal executive offices
are located at 1051 East Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 800, Foster
City, California 94404, and our telephone number is
(650) 578-7700.
Our website address is www.quinstreet.com. We do not incorporate
the information on or accessible through our website into this
prospectus, and you should not consider any information on, or
that can be accessed through, our website as part of this
prospectus, and investors should not rely on any such
information in deciding whether to purchase our common stock.
QuinStreet®,
the QuinStreet logo design and other trademarks or service marks
of QuinStreet appearing in this prospectus are the property of
QuinStreet. This prospectus also contains trademarks and trade
names of other businesses that are the property of their
respective holders.
3
THE
OFFERING
|
|
|
Common stock offered by QuinStreet |
|
10,000,000 shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
44,912,597 shares |
|
Over-allotment option |
|
1,500,000 shares |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We expect the net proceeds to us from this offering, after
deduction of the underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses, to be approximately
$137.2 million. We intend to use the net proceeds from this
offering for working capital, capital expenditures and other
general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the net
proceeds to repay debt or to acquire other businesses, products
or technologies. See Use of Proceeds. |
|
Dividend policy |
|
We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock for
the foreseeable future. |
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors beginning on page 10 and the
other information included in this prospectus for a discussion
of factors you should carefully consider before deciding whether
to purchase shares of our common stock. |
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market symbol |
|
QNST |
|
Financial advisor |
|
Qatalyst Partners LP is acting as our financial advisor in
connection with this offering. Qatalysts services consist
of (i) analyzing our business, condition and financial
position, (ii) preparing and implementing a plan for
identifying and selecting appropriate participants in the
underwriting syndicate, (iii) evaluating proposals that
were received from potential underwriters, (iv) negotiating
on our behalf the key terms of any contractual arrangements with
members of the underwriting syndicate, and (v) determining
various offering logistics. Qatalyst is not acting as an
underwriter and will not sell or offer to sell any securities
and will not identify, solicit or engage directly with potential
investors. In addition, Qatalyst will not underwrite or purchase
any of the offered securities or otherwise participate in any
such undertaking. |
The number of shares of common stock to be outstanding after
this offering is based on 34,912,597 shares of common stock
outstanding as of December 31, 2009, and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 11,504,767 shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of outstanding stock options as of
December 31, 2009 pursuant to our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan and having a weighted-average exercise price of $9.3429 per
share;
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 587,717 additional shares of common stock
reserved for future issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan as of December 31, 2009; provided, however, that
immediately upon the execution and delivery of the underwriting
agreement for this offering, our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan will
terminate so that no further awards may be granted under our
2008 Equity Incentive Plan and the shares then remaining and
reserved for future issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan shall become reserved for issuance under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan; and
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
the shares reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan and up to 300,000 additional shares of common
stock reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Award Plan, as well as any automatic
increases in the number of shares of common stock reserved for
future issuance under each of these benefit plans, which will
become effective immediately upon the execution and delivery of
the underwriting agreement for this offering.
|
Unless we specifically state otherwise, the share information in
this prospectus is as of December 31, 2009 and reflects or
assumes:
|
|
|
|
|
the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of our
convertible preferred stock into an aggregate of
21,176,533 shares of common stock effective immediately
prior to the closing of this offering;
|
|
|
|
that our amended and restated certificate of incorporation,
which we will file in connection with the completion of this
offering, is in effect; and
|
|
|
|
no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option to
purchase up to an additional 1,500,000 shares of common
stock from us.
|
5
SUMMARY
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table summarizes our consolidated financial data.
We have derived the following summary of our consolidated
statements of operations data for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 from our audited consolidated
financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The
consolidated statements of operations data for the six months
ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 and consolidated balance
sheet data as of December 31, 2009 have been derived from
our unaudited consolidated financial statements appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus. Our historical results are not
necessarily indicative of the results that should be expected in
the future and our interim results are not necessarily
indicative of the results that should be expected for the full
fiscal year. The summary of our consolidated financial data set
forth below should be read together with our consolidated
financial statements and the related notes to those statements,
as well as the sections titled Selected Consolidated
Financial Data and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
167,370
|
|
|
$
|
192,030
|
|
|
$
|
260,527
|
|
|
$
|
122,913
|
|
|
$
|
155,515
|
|
Cost of revenue(1)
|
|
|
108,945
|
|
|
|
130,869
|
|
|
|
181,593
|
|
|
|
88,250
|
|
|
|
111,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
58,425
|
|
|
|
61,161
|
|
|
|
78,934
|
|
|
|
34,663
|
|
|
|
43,911
|
|
Operating expenses:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
14,094
|
|
|
|
14,051
|
|
|
|
14,887
|
|
|
|
7,480
|
|
|
|
9,209
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
|
|
12,409
|
|
|
|
16,154
|
|
|
|
8,423
|
|
|
|
7,615
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
13,371
|
|
|
|
13,172
|
|
|
|
6,907
|
|
|
|
9,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
34,021
|
|
|
|
39,831
|
|
|
|
44,213
|
|
|
|
22,810
|
|
|
|
26,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
24,404
|
|
|
|
21,330
|
|
|
|
34,721
|
|
|
|
11,853
|
|
|
|
17,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
(3,538
|
)
|
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
|
(1,327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
25,438
|
|
|
|
21,743
|
|
|
|
31,183
|
|
|
|
9,920
|
|
|
|
16,116
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
|
(9,828
|
)
|
|
|
(8,876
|
)
|
|
|
(13,909
|
)
|
|
|
(4,266
|
)
|
|
|
(7,193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,610
|
|
|
$
|
12,867
|
|
|
$
|
17,274
|
|
|
$
|
5,654
|
|
|
$
|
8,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: 8% non-cumulative dividends on convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
Undistributed earnings allocated to convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(7,690
|
)
|
|
|
(5,925
|
)
|
|
|
(8,599
|
)
|
|
|
(2,468
|
)
|
|
|
(4,454
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders basic
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
3,666
|
|
|
$
|
5,399
|
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
$
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders basic
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
3,666
|
|
|
$
|
5,399
|
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
$
|
2,831
|
|
Undistributed earnings re-allocated to common stock
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
diluted
|
|
$
|
5,166
|
|
|
$
|
4,026
|
|
|
$
|
5,798
|
|
|
$
|
1,672
|
|
|
$
|
3,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic net income per
share
|
|
|
12,789
|
|
|
|
13,104
|
|
|
|
13,294
|
|
|
|
13,282
|
|
|
|
13,463
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net income per
share
|
|
|
15,263
|
|
|
|
15,325
|
|
|
|
14,971
|
|
|
|
15,103
|
|
|
|
16,169
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Pro forma net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing pro forma basic net
income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,640
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing pro forma diluted net
income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,346
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,916
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
1,490
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
3,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma as
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
34,139
|
|
|
$
|
171,305
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
31,527
|
|
|
|
168,693
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
281,845
|
|
|
|
419,011
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
147,410
|
|
|
|
147,410
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
105,695
|
|
|
|
105,695
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
91,032
|
|
|
|
271,601
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The pro forma as adjusted consolidated balance sheet data gives
effect to the conversion of all outstanding shares of
convertible preferred stock into shares of common stock
effective immediately prior to the closing of this offering and
to the sale of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock in
this offering at the initial public offering price of $15.00 per
share, after deducting the underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
25,197
|
|
|
$
|
24,751
|
|
|
$
|
32,570
|
|
|
$
|
9,371
|
|
|
$
|
16,077
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
11,727
|
|
|
|
15,978
|
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
|
|
8,603
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
36,112
|
|
|
$
|
36,279
|
|
|
$
|
56,872
|
|
|
$
|
23,114
|
|
|
$
|
33,139
|
|
7
|
|
(1) |
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income less interest income
plus interest expense, provision for taxes, depreciation
expense, amortization expense, stock-based compensation expense
and foreign-exchange (loss) gain. Please see
Adjusted EBITDA for more information and
for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to our net income
calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, or GAAP.
|
Adjusted
EBITDA
We include Adjusted EBITDA in this prospectus because
(i) we seek to manage our business to a consistent level of
Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net revenue, (ii) it is
a key basis upon which our management assesses our operating
performance, (iii) it is one of the primary metrics
investors use in evaluating Internet marketing companies,
(iv) it is a factor in the evaluation of the performance of
our management in determining compensation, and (v) it is
an element of certain maintenance covenants under our debt
agreements. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income less
interest income plus interest expense, provision for taxes,
depreciation expense, amortization expense, stock-based
compensation expense and foreign-exchange (loss) gain.
We use Adjusted EBITDA as a key performance measure because we
believe it facilitates operating performance comparisons from
period to period by excluding potential differences caused by
variations in capital structures (affecting interest expense),
tax positions (such as the impact on periods or companies of
changes in effective tax rates or fluctuations in permanent
differences or discrete quarterly items) and the impact of
depreciation and amortization expense on definite-lived
intangible assets. Because Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal
comparisons of our historical operating performance on a more
consistent basis, we also use Adjusted EBITDA for business
planning purposes, to incentivize and compensate our management
personnel and in evaluating acquisition opportunities.
In addition, we believe Adjusted EBITDA and similar measures are
widely used by investors, securities analysts, ratings agencies
and other interested parties in our industry as a measure of
financial performance and debt-service capabilities. Our use of
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you
should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for
analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these
limitations are:
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures for
capital equipment or other contractual commitments;
|
|
|
|
although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the
assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced
in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital
expenditure requirements for such replacements;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash
requirements for, our working capital needs;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not consider the potentially dilutive
impact of issuing equity-based compensation to our management
team and employees;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest
expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest
or principal payments on our indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect certain tax payments that may
represent a reduction in cash available to us; and
|
|
|
|
other companies, including companies in our industry, may
calculate Adjusted EBITDA measures differently, which reduces
their usefulness as a comparative measure.
|
Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should not be
considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to
invest in the growth of our business. When evaluating our
performance, you should consider Adjusted EBITDA alongside other
financial performance measures, including various cash flow
metrics, net income and our other GAAP results.
8
The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
to net income, the most comparable GAAP measure, for each of the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,610
|
|
|
$
|
12,867
|
|
|
$
|
17,274
|
|
|
$
|
5,654
|
|
|
$
|
8,923
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1,034
|
)
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
3,538
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
|
9,828
|
|
|
|
8,876
|
|
|
|
13,909
|
|
|
|
4,266
|
|
|
|
7,193
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
11,727
|
|
|
|
15,978
|
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
|
|
8,603
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
6,173
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
7,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
36,112
|
|
|
$
|
36,279
|
|
|
$
|
56,872
|
|
|
$
|
23,114
|
|
|
$
|
33,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
Before you invest in our common stock, you should be aware that
our business faces numerous financial and market risks,
including those described below, as well as general economic and
business risks. The following discussion provides information
concerning the material risks and uncertainties that we have
identified and believe may adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations. Before you decide
whether to invest in our common stock, you should carefully
consider these risks and uncertainties, together with all of the
other information included in this prospectus.
Risks
Related to Our Business and Industry
We
operate in an immature industry and have a relatively new
business model, which makes it difficult to evaluate our
business and prospects.
We derive nearly all of our revenue from the sale of online
marketing and media services, which is an immature industry that
has undergone rapid and dramatic changes in its short history.
The industry in which we operate is characterized by
rapidly-changing Internet media, evolving industry standards,
and changing user and client demands. Our business model is also
evolving and is distinct from many other companies in our
industry, and it may not be successful. As a result of these
factors, the future revenue and income potential of our business
is uncertain. Although we have experienced significant revenue
growth in recent periods, we may not be able to sustain current
revenue levels or growth rates. Any evaluation of our business
and our prospects must be considered in light of these factors
and the risks and uncertainties often encountered by companies
in an immature industry with an evolving business model such as
ours. Some of these risks and uncertainties relate to our
ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
maintain and expand client relationships;
|
|
|
|
sustain and increase the number of visitors to our websites;
|
|
|
|
sustain and grow relationships with third-party website
publishers and other sources of web visitors;
|
|
|
|
manage our expanding operations and implement and improve our
operational, financial and management controls;
|
|
|
|
raise capital at attractive costs, or at all;
|
|
|
|
acquire and integrate websites and other businesses;
|
|
|
|
successfully expand our footprint in our existing client
verticals and enter new client verticals;
|
|
|
|
respond effectively to competition and potential negative
effects of competition on profit margins;
|
|
|
|
attract and retain qualified management, employees and
independent service providers;
|
|
|
|
successfully introduce new processes and technologies and
upgrade our existing technologies and services;
|
|
|
|
protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property
rights; and
|
|
|
|
respond to government regulations relating to the Internet,
personal data protection, email, software technologies and other
aspects of our business.
|
If we are unable to address these risks, our business, results
of operations and prospects could suffer.
If we
do not effectively manage our growth, our operating performance
will suffer and we may lose clients.
We have experienced rapid growth in our operations and operating
locations, and we expect to experience continued growth in our
business, both through acquisitions and internal growth. This
growth has placed, and will continue to place, significant
demands on our management and our operational and financial
infrastructure. In particular, continued rapid growth and
acquisitions may make it more difficult for us to accomplish the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
successfully scale our technology to accommodate a larger
business and integrate acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
maintain our standing with key vendors, including Internet
search companies and third-party website publishers;
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
maintain our client service standards; and
|
|
|
|
develop and improve our operational, financial and management
controls and maintain adequate reporting systems and procedures.
|
In addition, our personnel, systems, procedures and controls may
be inadequate to support our future operations. The improvements
required to manage our growth will require us to make
significant expenditures, expand, train and manage our employee
base and allocate valuable management resources. If we fail to
effectively manage our growth, our operating performance will
suffer and we may lose clients, third-party website publishers
and key personnel.
We
depend upon Internet search companies to attract a significant
portion of the visitors to our websites, and any change in the
search companies search algorithms or perception of us or
our industry could result in our websites being listed less
prominently in either paid or algorithmic search result
listings, in which case the number of visitors to our websites
and our revenue could decline.
We depend in significant part on various Internet search
companies, such as Google, Microsoft and Yahoo!, and other
search websites to direct a significant number of visitors to
our websites to provide our online marketing services to our
clients. Search websites typically provide two types of search
results, algorithmic and paid listings. Algorithmic, or organic,
listings are determined and displayed solely by a set of
formulas designed by search companies. Paid listings can be
purchased and then are displayed if particular words are
included in a users Internet search. Placement in paid
listings is generally not determined solely on the bid price,
but also takes into account the search engines assessment
of the quality of website featured in the paid listing and other
factors. We rely on both algorithmic and paid search results, as
well as advertising on other websites, to direct a substantial
share of the visitors to our websites.
Our ability to maintain the number of visitors to our websites
from search websites and other websites is not entirely within
our control. For example, Internet search websites frequently
revise their algorithms in an attempt to optimize their search
result listings or to maintain their internal standards and
strategies. Changes in the algorithms could cause our websites
to receive less favorable placements, which could reduce the
number of users who visit our websites. We have experienced
fluctuations in the search result rankings for a number of our
websites. We may make decisions that are suboptimal regarding
the purchase of paid listings or our proprietary bid management
technologies may contain defects or otherwise fail to achieve
their intended results, either of which could also reduce the
number of visitors to our websites. We may also make decisions
that are suboptimal regarding the placement of advertisements on
other websites and pricing, which could increase our costs to
attract such visitors or cause us to incur unnecessary costs.
Our approaches may be deemed similar to those of our competitors
and others in our industry that Internet search websites may
consider to be unsuitable or unattractive. Internet search
websites could deem our content to be unsuitable or below
standards or less attractive or worthy than those of other or
competing websites. In either such case, our websites may
receive less favorable placement. Any reduction in the number of
visitors to our websites would negatively affect our ability to
earn revenue. If visits to our websites decrease, we may need to
resort to more costly sources to replace lost visitors, and such
increased expense could adversely affect our business and
profitability.
Our
future growth depends in part on our ability to identify and
complete acquisitions.
Our growth over the past several years is in significant part
due to the large number of acquisitions we have completed. Since
the beginning of fiscal year 2007, we have completed over 100
acquisitions of third-party website publishing businesses and
other businesses that are complementary to our own for an
aggregate purchase price of approximately $189.5 million.
We intend to pursue acquisitions of complementary businesses and
technologies to expand our capabilities, client base and media.
We have evaluated, and expect to continue to evaluate, a wide
array of potential strategic transactions. However, we may not
be successful in identifying suitable acquisition candidates or
be able to complete acquisitions of such candidates. In
addition, we may not be able to obtain financing on favorable
terms, or at all, to fund acquisitions that we may wish to
pursue.
11
Any
acquisitions that we complete will involve a number of risks. If
we are unable to address and resolve these risks successfully,
such acquisitions could harm our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
The anticipated benefit of any acquisitions that we complete may
not materialize. In addition, the process of integrating
acquired businesses or technologies may create unforeseen
operating difficulties and expenditures. Some of the areas where
we may face acquisition-related risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
diversion of management time and potential business disruptions;
|
|
|
|
expenses, distractions and potential claims resulting from
acquisitions, whether or not they are completed;
|
|
|
|
retaining and integrating employees from any businesses we may
acquire;
|
|
|
|
issuance of dilutive equity securities, incurrence of debt or
reduction in cash balances;
|
|
|
|
integrating various accounting, management, information, human
resource and other systems to permit effective management;
|
|
|
|
incurring possible impairment charges, contingent liabilities,
amortization expense or write-offs of goodwill;
|
|
|
|
difficulties integrating and supporting acquired products or
technologies;
|
|
|
|
unexpected capital expenditure requirements;
|
|
|
|
insufficient revenue to offset increased expenses associated
with acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
underperformance problems associated with acquisitions; and
|
|
|
|
becoming involved in acquisition-related litigation.
|
Foreign acquisitions would involve risks in addition to those
mentioned above, including those related to integration of
operations across different cultures and languages, currency
risks and the particular economic, political, administrative and
management, and regulatory risks associated with specific
countries. We may not be able to address these risks
successfully, or at all, without incurring significant costs,
delay or other operating problems. Our inability to resolve such
risks could harm our business and results of operations.
A
substantial portion of our revenue is generated from a limited
number of clients and, if we lose a major client, our revenue
will decrease and our business and prospects would be adversely
impacted.
A substantial portion of our revenue is generated from a limited
number of clients. Our top three clients accounted for 32% and
26% of our net revenue for the fiscal year 2009 and the first
half of fiscal year 2010, respectively. Our clients can
generally terminate their contracts with us at any time, with
limited prior notice or penalty. DeVry Inc., our largest client,
accounted for approximately 19% and 12% of our net revenue for
fiscal year 2009 and the first half of fiscal year 2010,
respectively. DeVry has recently retained an advertising agency
and has reduced its purchases of leads from us. DeVry and other
clients may reduce their current level of business with us,
leading to lower revenue. We expect that a limited number of
clients will continue to account for a significant percentage of
our revenue, and the loss of, or material reduction in, their
marketing spending with us could decrease our revenue and harm
our business.
We are
dependent on two market verticals for a majority of our
revenue.
To date, we have generated a majority of our revenue from
clients in our education vertical. We expect that a majority of
our revenue in fiscal year 2010 will be generated from clients
in our education and financial services verticals. A downturn in
economic or market conditions adversely affecting the education
industry or the financial services industry would negatively
impact our business and financial condition. Over the past year,
education marketing spending has remained relatively stable, but
this stability may not continue. Marketing budgets for clients
in our education vertical are impacted by a number of factors,
including the availability of student financial aid, the
regulation of for-profit financial institutions and economic
conditions. Over the past year, some segments of the financial
services industry, particularly mortgages, credit cards and
deposits, have seen declines in marketing budgets given the
difficult market conditions. These declines may continue or
worsen. In addition, the education and financial services
industries are highly regulated. Changes
12
in regulations or government actions may negatively impact our
clients marketing practices and budgets and, therefore,
adversely affect our financial results.
The United States Higher Education Act, administered by the
U.S. Department of Education, provides that to be eligible
to participate in Federal student financial aid programs, an
educational institution must enter into a program participation
agreement with the Secretary of the Department of Education. The
agreement includes a number of conditions with which an
institution must comply to be granted initial and continuing
eligibility to participate. Among those conditions is a
prohibition on institutions providing any commission, bonus, or
other incentive payment based directly or indirectly on success
in securing enrollments to any individual or entity engaged in
recruiting or admission activities. The regulations promulgated
under the Higher Education Act specify a number of types of
compensation, or safe harbors, that do not
constitute incentive compensation in violation of this
agreement. One of these safe harbors permits an institution to
award incentive compensation for Internet-based recruitment and
admission activities that provide information about the
institution to prospective students, refer prospective students
to the institution, or permit prospective students to apply for
admission online. The U.S. Department of Education is currently
engaged in a negotiated rulemaking process in which it has
suggested repealing all existing safe harbors regarding
incentive compensation in recruiting, including the Internet
safe harbor. While we do not believe that compensation for
services constitutes incentive compensation under the Higher
Education Act, the elimination of the safe harbor could create
uncertainty for our education clients and impact the way in
which we are paid by our clients and, accordingly, could reduce
the amount of net revenue we generate from the education client
vertical.
In addition, some of our clients have had and may in the future
have issues regarding their academic accreditation, which can
adversely affect their ability to offer certain degree programs.
If any of our significant education clients lose their
accreditation, they may reduce or eliminate their marketing
spending, which could adversely affect our financial results.
If we
are unable to retain the members of our management team or
attract and retain qualified management team members in the
future, our business and growth could suffer.
Our success and future growth depend, to a significant degree,
on the continued contributions of the members of our management
team. Each member of our management team is an at-will employee
and may voluntarily terminate his or her employment with us at
any time with minimal notice. We also may need to hire
additional management team members to adequately manage our
growing business. We may not be able to retain or identify and
attract additional qualified management team members.
Competition for experienced management-level personnel in our
industry is intense. Qualified individuals are in high demand,
particularly in the Internet marketing industry, and we may
incur significant costs to attract and retain them. If we lose
the services of any of our senior managers or if we are unable
to attract and retain additional qualified senior managers, our
business and growth could suffer.
We
need to hire and retain additional qualified personnel to grow
and manage our business. If we are unable to attract and retain
qualified personnel, our business and growth could be seriously
harmed.
Our performance depends on the talents and efforts of our
employees. Our future success will depend on our ability to
attract, retain and motivate highly skilled personnel in all
areas of our organization and, in particular, in our
engineering/technology, sales and marketing, media, finance and
legal/regulatory teams. We plan to continue to grow our business
and will need to hire additional personnel to support this
growth. We have found it difficult from time to time to locate
and hire suitable personnel. If we experience similar
difficulties in the future, our growth may be hindered.
Qualified individuals are in high demand, particularly in the
Internet marketing industry, and we may incur significant costs
to attract and retain them. Many of our employees have also
become, or will soon become, substantially vested in their stock
option grants. Employees may be more likely to leave us
following our initial public offering as a result of the
establishment of a public market for our common stock. If we are
unable to attract and retain the personnel we need to succeed,
our business and growth could be harmed.
13
We
depend on third-party website publishers for a significant
portion of our visitors, and any decline in the supply of media
available through these websites or increase in the price of
this media could cause our revenue to decline or our cost to
reach visitors to increase.
A significant portion of our revenue is attributable to visitors
originating from advertising placements that we purchase on
third-party websites. In many instances, website publishers can
change the advertising inventory they make available to us at
any time and, therefore, impact our revenue. In addition,
website publishers may place significant restrictions on our
offerings. These restrictions may prohibit advertisements from
specific clients or specific industries, or restrict the use of
certain creative content or formats. If a website publisher
decides not to make advertising inventory available to us, or
decides to demand a higher revenue share or places significant
restrictions on the use of such inventory, we may not be able to
find advertising inventory from other websites that satisfy our
requirements in a timely and cost-effective manner. In addition,
the number of competing online marketing service providers and
advertisers that acquire inventory from websites continues to
increase. Consolidation of Internet advertising networks and
website publishers could eventually lead to a concentration of
desirable inventory on a small number of websites or networks,
which could limit the supply of inventory available to us or
increase the price of inventory to us. We cannot assure you that
we will be able to acquire advertising inventory that meets our
clients performance, price and quality requirements. If
any of these things occur, our revenue could decline or our
operating costs may increase.
We
have incurred a significant amount of debt, which may limit our
ability to fund general corporate requirements and obtain
additional financing, limit our flexibility in responding to
business opportunities and competitive developments and increase
our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry
conditions.
As of December 31, 2009, we had an outstanding term loan
with a principal balance of approximately $27.0 million and
a revolving credit facility pursuant to which we can borrow up
to an additional $100.0 million. As of December 31,
2009, we had drawn $49.8 million from our revolving credit
facility. In January 2010, we replaced our existing credit
facility with a credit facility with a total borrowing capacity
of $175.0 million. The new facility consists of a
$35.0 million four-year term loan, with principal
amortization of 10%, 15%, 35% and 40% annually, and a
$140.0 million four-year revolving credit facility. As of
December 31, 2009, we also had outstanding notes to sellers
arising from numerous acquisitions in the total principal amount
of $29.8 million. As a result of our debt:
|
|
|
|
|
we may not have sufficient liquidity to respond to business
opportunities, competitive developments and adverse economic
conditions;
|
|
|
|
we may not have sufficient liquidity to fund all of these costs
if our revenue declines or costs increase; and
|
|
|
|
we may not have sufficient funds to repay the principal balance
of our debt when due.
|
Our debt obligations may also impair our ability to obtain
additional financing, if needed. Our indebtedness is secured by
substantially all of our assets, leaving us with limited
collateral for additional financing. Moreover, the terms of our
indebtedness restrict our ability to take certain actions,
including the incurrence of additional indebtedness, mergers and
acquisitions, investments and asset sales. In addition, even if
we are able to raise needed equity financing, we are required to
use a portion of the net proceeds of certain types of equity
financings to repay the outstanding balance of our term loan. A
failure to pay interest or indebtedness when due could result in
a variety of adverse consequences, including the acceleration of
our indebtedness. In such a situation, it is unlikely that we
would be able to fulfill our obligations under our credit
facilities or repay the accelerated indebtedness or otherwise
cover our costs.
The
severe economic downturn in the United States poses additional
risks to our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The United States has experienced, and is continuing to
experience, a severe economic downturn. The credit crisis,
deterioration of global economies, rising unemployment and
reduced equity valuations all create risks that could harm our
business. If macroeconomic conditions worsen, we are not able to
predict the impact such worsening conditions will have on the
online marketing industry in general, and our results of
operations
14
specifically. Clients in particular verticals such as financial
services, particularly mortgage, credit cards and deposits,
small- to medium-sized business customers and home services are
facing very difficult conditions and their marketing spend has
been negatively affected. These conditions could also damage our
business opportunities in existing markets, and reduce our
revenue and profitability. While the effect of these and related
conditions poses widespread risk across our business, we believe
that it may particularly affect our efforts in the mortgage,
credit cards and deposits, small- to medium-sized business and
home services verticals, due to reduced availability of credit
for households and business and reduced household disposable
income. Economic conditions may not improve or may worsen.
Our
operating results have fluctuated in the past and may do so in
the future, which makes our results of operations difficult to
predict and could cause our operating results to fall short of
analysts and investors expectations.
While we have experienced continued revenue growth, our prior
quarterly and annual operating results have fluctuated due to
changes in our business, our industry and the general economic
climate. Similarly, our future operating results may vary
significantly from quarter to quarter due to a variety of
factors, many of which are beyond our control. Our fluctuating
results could cause our performance to be below the expectations
of securities analysts and investors, causing the price of our
common stock to fall. Because our business is changing and
evolving, our historical operating results may not be useful to
you in predicting our future operating results. Factors that may
increase the volatility of our operating results include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in demand and pricing for our services;
|
|
|
|
changes in our pricing policies, the pricing policies of our
competitors, or the pricing of Internet advertising or media;
|
|
|
|
the addition of new clients or the loss of existing clients;
|
|
|
|
changes in our clients advertising agencies or the
marketing strategies our clients or their advertising agencies
employ;
|
|
|
|
changes in the economic prospects of our clients or the economy
generally, which could alter current or prospective
clients spending priorities, or could increase the time or
costs required to complete sales with clients;
|
|
|
|
changes in the availability of Internet advertising or the cost
to reach Internet visitors;
|
|
|
|
changes in the placement of our websites on search engines;
|
|
|
|
the introduction of new product or service offerings by our
competitors; and
|
|
|
|
costs related to acquisitions of businesses or technologies.
|
Our
quarterly revenue and operating results may fluctuate
significantly from quarter to quarter due to seasonal
fluctuations in advertising spending.
The timing of our revenue, particularly from our education
client vertical, is affected by seasonal factors. For example,
the first quarter of each fiscal year typically demonstrates
seasonal strength and our second fiscal quarter typically
demonstrates seasonal weakness. In our second fiscal quarter,
our education clients often take fewer leads due to holiday
staffing and lower availability of lead supply caused by higher
media pricing for some forms of media during the holiday period,
causing our revenue to be sequentially lower. Our fluctuating
results could cause our performance to be below the expectations
of securities analysts and investors, causing the price of our
common stock to fall. To the extent our rate of growth slows, we
expect that the seasonality in our business may become more
apparent and may in the future cause our operating results to
fluctuate to a greater extent.
We may
need additional capital in the future to meet our financial
obligations and to pursue our business objectives. Additional
capital may not be available or may not be available on
favorable terms and our business and financial condition could
therefore be adversely affected.
While we anticipate the net proceeds of this offering, together
with availability under our existing credit facility, cash
balances and cash from operations, will be sufficient to fund
our operations for at least the next 12 months, we may need
to raise additional capital to fund operations in the future or
to finance acquisitions. If
15
we seek to raise additional capital in order to meet various
objectives, including developing future technologies and
services, increasing working capital, acquiring businesses and
responding to competitive pressures, capital may not be
available on favorable terms or may not be available at all. In
addition, pursuant to the terms of our credit facility, we are
required to use a portion of the net proceeds of any equity
financing, other than this offering and any other public equity
offerings, to repay the outstanding balance of our term loan.
Lack of sufficient capital resources could significantly limit
our ability to take advantage of business and strategic
opportunities. Any additional capital raised through the sale of
equity or debt securities with an equity component would dilute
our stock ownership. If adequate additional funds are not
available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or
eliminate material parts of our business strategy, including
potential additional acquisitions or development of new
technologies.
If we
fail to compete effectively against other online marketing and
media companies and other competitors, we could lose clients and
our revenue may decline.
The market for online marketing is intensely competitive. We
expect this competition to continue to increase in the future.
We perceive only limited barriers to entry to the online
marketing industry. We compete both for clients and for limited
high quality advertising inventory. We compete for clients on
the basis of a number of factors, including return on marketing
expenditures, price, and client service.
We compete with Internet and traditional media companies for a
share of clients overall marketing budgets, including:
|
|
|
|
|
online marketing or media services providers such as Monster
Worldwide in the education vertical and Bankrate in financial
services;
|
|
|
|
offline and online advertising agencies;
|
|
|
|
major Internet portals and search engine companies with
advertising networks such as Google, Yahoo!, MSN, and AOL;
|
|
|
|
other online marketing service providers, including online
affiliate advertising networks and industry-specific portals or
lead generation companies;
|
|
|
|
website publishers with their own sales forces that sell their
online marketing services directly to clients;
|
|
|
|
in-house marketing groups at current or potential clients;
|
|
|
|
offline direct marketing agencies; and
|
|
|
|
television, radio and print companies.
|
Competition for web traffic among websites and search engines,
as well as competition with traditional media companies, could
result in significant price pressure, declining margins,
reductions in revenue and loss of market share. In addition, as
we continue to expand the scope of our services, we may compete
with a greater number of websites, clients and traditional media
companies across an increasing range of different services,
including in vertical markets where competitors may have
advantages in expertise, brand recognition and other areas.
Large Internet companies with brand recognition, such as Google,
Yahoo!, MSN, and AOL, have significant numbers of direct sales
personnel and substantial proprietary advertising inventory and
web traffic that provide a significant competitive advantage and
have significant impact on pricing for Internet advertising and
web traffic. The trend toward consolidation in the Internet
advertising arena may also affect pricing and availability of
advertising inventory and web traffic. Many of our current and
potential competitors also enjoy other competitive advantages
over us, such as longer operating histories, greater brand
recognition, larger client bases, greater access to advertising
inventory on high-traffic websites, and significantly greater
financial, technical and marketing resources. As a result, we
may not be able to compete successfully. If we fail to deliver
results that are superior to those that other online marketing
service providers achieve, we could lose clients and our revenue
may decline.
16
If the
market for online marketing services fails to continue to
develop, our future growth may be limited and our revenue may
decrease.
The online marketing services market is relatively new and
rapidly evolving, and it uses different measurements than
traditional media to gauge its effectiveness. Some of our
current or potential clients have little or no experience using
the Internet for advertising and marketing purposes and have
allocated only limited portions of their advertising and
marketing budgets to the Internet. The adoption of Internet
advertising, particularly by those entities that have
historically relied upon traditional media for advertising,
requires the acceptance of a new way of conducting business,
exchanging information and evaluating new advertising and
marketing technologies and services. In particular, we are
dependent on our clients adoption of new metrics to
measure the success of online marketing campaigns. We may also
experience resistance from traditional advertising agencies who
may be advising our clients. We cannot assure you that the
market for online marketing services will continue to grow. If
the market for online marketing services fails to continue to
develop or develops more slowly than we anticipate, our ability
to grow our business may be limited and our revenue may decrease.
Third-party
website publishers can engage in unauthorized or unlawful acts
that could subject us to significant liability or cause us to
lose clients.
We generate a significant portion of our web visitors from media
advertising that we purchase from third-party website
publishers. Some of these publishers are authorized to display
our clients brands, subject to contractual restrictions.
In the past, some of our third-party website publishers have
engaged in activities that certain of our clients have viewed as
harmful to their brands, such as displaying outdated
descriptions of a clients offerings or outdated logos. Any
activity by publishers that clients view as potentially damaging
to their brands can harm our relationship with the client and
cause the client to terminate its relationship with us,
resulting in a loss of revenue. In addition, the law is
unsettled on the extent of liability that an advertiser in our
position has for the activities of third-party website
publishers. We could be subject to costly litigation and, if we
are unsuccessful in defending ourselves, damages for the
unauthorized or unlawful acts of third-party website publishers.
Poor
perception of our business or industry as a result of the
actions of third parties could harm our reputation and adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our business is dependent on attracting a large number of
visitors to our websites and providing leads and clicks to our
clients, which depends in part on our reputation within the
industry and with our clients. There are companies within our
industry that regularly engage in activities that our
clients customers may view as unlawful or inappropriate.
These activities, such as spyware or deceptive promotions, by
third parties may be seen by clients as characteristic of
participants in our industry and, therefore, may have an adverse
effect on the reputation of all participants in our industry,
including us. Any damage to our reputation, including from
publicity from legal proceedings against us or companies that
work within our industry, governmental proceedings, consumer
class action litigation, or the disclosure of information
security breaches or private information misuse, could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Because
many of our client contracts can be cancelled by the client with
little prior notice or penalty, the cancellation of one or more
contracts could result in an immediate decline in our
revenue.
We derive our revenue from contracts with our Internet marketing
clients, most of which are cancelable with little or no prior
notice. In addition, these contracts do not contain penalty
provisions for cancellation before the end of the contract term.
The non-renewal, renegotiation, cancellation, or deferral of
large contracts, or a number of contracts that in the aggregate
account for a significant amount of our revenue, is difficult to
anticipate and could result in an immediate decline in our
revenue.
Unauthorized
access to or accidental disclosure of consumer
personally-identifiable information that we collect may cause us
to incur significant expenses and may negatively impact our
credibility and business.
There is growing concern over the security of personal
information transmitted over the Internet, consumer identity
theft and user privacy. Despite our implementation of security
measures, our computer systems may be
17
susceptible to electronic or physical computer break-ins,
viruses and other disruptions and security breaches. Any
perceived or actual unauthorized disclosure of
personally-identifiable information regarding website visitors,
whether through breach of our network by an unauthorized party,
employee theft, misuse or error or otherwise, could harm our
reputation, impair our ability to attract website visitors and
attract and retain our clients, or subject us to claims or
litigation arising from damages suffered by consumers, and
thereby harm our business and operating results. In addition, we
could incur significant costs in complying with the multitude of
state, federal and foreign laws regarding the unauthorized
disclosure of personal information.
If we
do not adequately protect our intellectual property rights, our
competitive position and business may suffer.
Our ability to compete effectively depends upon our proprietary
systems and technology. We rely on trade secret, trademark and
copyright law, confidentiality agreements, technical measures
and patents to protect our proprietary rights. We currently have
one patent application pending in the United States and no
issued patents. Effective trade secret, copyright, trademark and
patent protection may not be available in all countries where we
currently operate or in which we may operate in the future. Some
of our systems and technologies are not covered by any
copyright, patent or patent application. We cannot guarantee
that: (i) our intellectual property rights will provide
competitive advantages to us; (ii) our ability to assert
our intellectual property rights against potential competitors
or to settle current or future disputes will not be limited by
our agreements with third parties; (iii) our intellectual
property rights will be enforced in jurisdictions where
competition may be intense or where legal protection may be
weak; (iv) any of the patents, trademarks, copyrights,
trade secrets or other intellectual property rights that we
presently employ in our business will not lapse or be
invalidated, circumvented, challenged, or abandoned;
(v) competitors will not design around our protected
systems and technology; or (vi) that we will not lose the
ability to assert our intellectual property rights against
others.
We are a party to a number of third-party intellectual property
license agreements and in the future, may need to obtain
additional licenses or renew existing license agreements. We are
unable to predict with certainty whether these license
agreements can be obtained or renewed on commercially reasonable
terms, or at all.
We have from time to time become aware of third parties who we
believe may have infringed on our intellectual property rights.
The use of our intellectual property rights by others could
reduce any competitive advantage we have developed and cause us
to lose clients, third-party website publishers or otherwise
harm our business. Policing unauthorized use of our proprietary
rights can be difficult and costly. In addition, litigation,
while it may be necessary to enforce or protect our intellectual
property rights or to defend litigation brought against us,
could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and
management attention and could adversely affect our business,
even if we are successful on the merits.
Confidentiality
agreements with employees, consultants and others may not
adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other
proprietary information.
We have devoted substantial resources to the development of our
proprietary systems and technology. In order to protect our
proprietary systems and technology, we enter into
confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants,
independent contractors and other advisors. These agreements may
not effectively prevent unauthorized disclosure of confidential
information or unauthorized parties from copying aspects of our
services or obtaining and using information that we regard as
proprietary. Moreover, these agreements may not provide an
adequate remedy in the event of such unauthorized disclosures of
confidential information and we cannot assure you that our
rights under such agreements will be enforceable. In addition,
others may independently discover trade secrets and proprietary
information, and in such cases we could not assert any trade
secret rights against such parties. Costly and time-consuming
litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope
of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain
trade secret protection could reduce any competitive advantage
we have and cause us to lose clients, publishers or otherwise
harm our business.
18
Third
parties may sue us for intellectual property infringement which,
if successful, could require us to pay significant damages or
curtail our offerings.
We cannot be certain that our internally-developed or acquired
systems and technologies do not and will not infringe the
intellectual property rights of others. In addition, we license
content, software and other intellectual property rights from
third parties and may be subject to claims of infringement if
such parties do not possess the necessary intellectual property
rights to the products they license to us. We have in the past
and may in the future be subject to legal proceedings and claims
that we have infringed the patent or other intellectual property
rights of a third-party. These claims sometimes involve patent
holding companies or other adverse patent owners who have no
relevant product revenue and against whom our own patents, if
any, may therefore provide little or no deterrence. In addition,
third parties have asserted and may in the future assert
intellectual property infringement claims against our clients,
which we have agreed in certain circumstances to indemnify and
defend against such claims. Any intellectual property related
infringement claims, whether or not meritorious, could result in
costly litigation and could divert management resources and
attention. Moreover, should we be found liable for infringement,
we may be required to enter into licensing agreements, if
available on acceptable terms or at all, pay substantial
damages, or limit or curtail our systems and technologies.
Moreover, we may need to redesign some of our systems and
technologies to avoid future infringement liability. Any of the
foregoing could prevent us from competing effectively and
increase our costs.
Additionally, the laws relating to use of trademarks on the
Internet are currently unsettled, particularly as they apply to
search engine functionality. For example, other Internet
marketing and search companies have been sued in the past for
trademark infringement and other intellectual property-related
claims for the display of ads or search results in response to
user queries that include trademarked terms. The outcomes of
these lawsuits have differed from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
For this reason, it is conceivable that certain of our
activities could expose us to trademark infringement, unfair
competition, misappropriation or other intellectual property
related claims which could be costly to defend and result in
substantial damages or otherwise limit or curtail our
activities, and adversely affect our business or prospects.
Our
proprietary technologies may include design or performance
defects and may not achieve their intended results, either of
which could impair our future revenue growth.
Our proprietary technologies are relatively new, and they may
contain design or performance defects that are not yet apparent.
The use of our proprietary technologies may not achieve the
intended results as effectively as other technologies that exist
now or may be introduced by our competitors, in which case our
business could be harmed.
If we
are unable to price our services appropriately, our margins and
revenue may decline.
Our clients purchase our services according to a variety of
pricing formulae, the vast majority of which are based on pay
for performance, meaning clients pay only after we have
delivered the desired result to them. Regardless of how a given
client pays us, we ordinarily pay the vast majority of the costs
associated with delivering our services to our clients according
to contracts and other arrangements that do not always condition
payment to vendors upon receipt of payments from our clients.
This means we typically pay for the costs of providing our
marketing services before we receive payment from clients.
Additionally, certain of our marketing services costs are highly
variable and may fluctuate significantly during each calendar
month. Accordingly, we run the risk of not being able to recover
the entire cost of our services from clients if pricing or other
terms negotiated prior to the performance of services prove less
than the cost of performing such services. We have experienced
situations in the past where we incurred losses in the delivery
of our services to specific clients. If we are unable to avoid
recurrence of similar situations in the future through
negotiation of profitable pricing and other terms, our results
of operations will suffer.
If we
fail to keep pace with rapidly-changing technologies and
industry standards, we could lose clients or advertising
inventory and our results of operations may
suffer.
The business lines in which we currently compete are
characterized by rapidly-changing Internet media and marketing
standards, changing technologies, frequent new product and
service introductions, and changing
19
user and client demands. The introduction of new technologies
and services embodying new technologies and the emergence of new
industry standards and practices could render our existing
technologies and services obsolete and unmarketable or require
unanticipated investments in technology. Our future success will
depend in part on our ability to adapt to these rapidly-changing
Internet media formats and other technologies. We will need to
enhance our existing technologies and services and develop and
introduce new technologies and services to address our
clients changing demands. If we fail to adapt successfully
to such developments or timely introduce new technologies and
services, we could lose clients, our expenses could increase and
we could lose advertising inventory.
Changes
in government regulation and industry standards applicable to
the Internet and our business could decrease demand for our
technologies and services or increase our costs.
Laws and regulations that apply to Internet communications,
commerce and advertising are becoming more prevalent. These
regulations could increase the costs of conducting business on
the Internet and could decrease demand for our technologies and
services.
In the United States, federal and state laws have been enacted
regarding copyrights, sending of unsolicited commercial email,
user privacy, search engines, Internet tracking technologies,
direct marketing, data security, childrens privacy,
pricing, sweepstakes, promotions, intellectual property
ownership and infringement, trade secrets, export of encryption
technology, taxation and acceptable content and quality of
goods. Other laws and regulations may be adopted in the future.
Laws and regulations, including those related to privacy and use
of personal information, are changing rapidly outside the United
States as well which may make compliance with such laws and
regulations difficult and which may negatively affect our
ability to expand internationally. This legislation could:
(i) hinder growth in the use of the Internet generally;
(ii) decrease the acceptance of the Internet as a
communications, commercial and advertising medium;
(iii) reduce our revenue; (iv) increase our operating
expenses; or (v) expose us to significant liabilities.
The laws governing the Internet remain largely unsettled, even
in areas where there has been some legislative action. While we
actively monitor this changing legal and regulatory landscape to
stay abreast of changes in the laws and regulations applicable
to our business, we are not certain how our business might be
affected by the application of existing laws governing issues
such as property ownership, copyrights, encryption and other
intellectual property issues, libel, obscenity and export or
import matters to the Internet advertising industry. The vast
majority of such laws were adopted prior to the advent of the
Internet. As a result, they do not contemplate or address the
unique issues of the Internet and related technologies. Changes
in laws intended to address such issues could create uncertainty
in the Internet market. It may take years to determine how
existing laws apply to the Internet and Internet marketing. Such
uncertainty makes it difficult to predict costs and could reduce
demand for our services or increase the cost of doing business
as a result of litigation costs or increased service delivery
costs.
In particular, a number of U.S. federal laws impact our
business. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA, is
intended, in part, to limit the liability of eligible online
service providers for listing or linking to third-party websites
that include materials that infringe copyrights or other rights.
Portions of the Communications Decency Act, or CDA, are intended
to provide statutory protections to online service providers who
distribute third-party content. We rely on the protections
provided by both the DMCA and CDA in conducting our business. In
addition, the United States Higher Education Act provides that
to be eligible to participate in Federal student financial aid
programs, an educational institution must enter into a program
participation agreement with the Secretary of the Department of
Education. The agreement includes a number of conditions with
which an institution must comply to be granted initial and
continuing eligibility to participate. Among those conditions is
a prohibition on institutions providing any commission, bonus,
or other incentive payment based directly or indirectly on
success in securing enrollments to any individual or entity
engaged in recruiting or admission activities. The regulations
promulgated under the Higher Education Act specify a number of
types of compensation, or safe harbors, that do not
constitute incentive compensation in violation of this
agreement. One of these safe harbors permits an institution to
award incentive compensation for Internet-based recruitment and
admission activities that provide information about the
institution to prospective students, refer prospective students
to the institution, or permit prospective students to apply for
20
admission online. The U.S. Department of Education is
currently engaged in a negotiated rulemaking process in which it
has suggested repealing all existing safe harbors regarding
incentive compensation in recruiting, including the Internet
safe harbor. Any changes in these laws or judicial
interpretations narrowing their protections will subject us to
greater risk of liability and may increase our costs of
compliance with these regulations or limit our ability to
operate certain lines of business.
The financial services, education and medical industries are
highly regulated and our marketing activities on behalf of our
clients in those industries are also regulated. For example, our
mortgage websites and marketing services we offer are subject to
various federal, state and local laws, including state mortgage
broker licensing laws, federal and state laws prohibiting unfair
acts and practices, and federal and state advertising laws. Any
failure to comply with these laws and regulations could subject
us to revocation of required licenses, civil, criminal or
administrative liability, damage to our reputation or changes to
or limitations on the conduct of our business. Any of the
foregoing could cause our business, operations and financial
condition to suffer.
New
tax treatment of companies engaged in Internet commerce may
adversely affect the commercial use of our marketing services
and our financial results.
Due to the global nature of the Internet, it is possible that,
although our services and the Internet transmissions related to
them originate in California and Nevada, and in some cases,
England, governments of other states or foreign countries might
attempt to regulate our transmissions or levy sales, income or
other taxes relating to our activities. We have experienced
certain states taking expansive positions with regard to their
taxation of our services. Tax authorities at the international,
federal, state and local levels are currently reviewing the
appropriate tax treatment of companies engaged in Internet
commerce. New or revised state tax regulations may subject us or
our affiliates to additional state sales, income and other
taxes. We cannot predict the effect of current attempts to
impose sales, income or other taxes on commerce over the
Internet. New or revised taxes and, in particular, sales taxes,
would likely increase the cost of doing business online and
decrease the attractiveness of advertising and selling goods and
services over the Internet. New taxes could also create
significant increases in internal costs necessary to capture
data, and collect and remit taxes. Any of these events could
have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Limitations
on our ability to collect and use data derived from user
activities could significantly diminish the value of our
services and cause us to lose clients and revenue.
When a user visits our websites, we use technologies, including
cookies, to collect information such as the
users Internet Protocol, or IP, address, offerings
delivered by us that have been previously viewed by the user and
responses by the user to those offerings. In order to determine
the effectiveness of a marketing campaign and to determine how
to modify the campaign, we need to access and analyze this
information. The use of cookies has been the subject of
regulatory scrutiny and users are able to block or delete
cookies from their browser. Periodically, certain of our clients
and publishers seek to prohibit or limit our collection or use
of this data. Interruptions, failures or defects in our data
collection systems, as well as privacy concerns regarding the
collection of user data, could also limit our ability to analyze
data from our clients marketing campaigns. This risk is
heightened when we deliver marketing services to clients in the
financial and medical services client verticals. If our access
to data is limited in the future, we may be unable to provide
effective technologies and services to clients and we may lose
clients and revenue.
As a
creator and a distributor of Internet content, we face potential
liability and expenses for legal claims based on the nature and
content of the materials that we create or distribute. If we are
required to pay damages or expenses in connection with these
legal claims, our operating results and business may be
harmed.
We create original content for our websites and marketing
messages and distribute third-party content on our websites and
in our marketing messages. As a creator and distributor of
original content and third-party provided content, we face
potential liability based on a variety of theories, including
defamation, negligence, copyright or trademark infringement or
other legal theories based on the nature, creation or
distribution of this information. It is also possible that our
website visitors could make claims against us for losses
incurred in
21
reliance upon information provided on our websites. In addition,
as the number of users of forums and social media features on
our websites increases, we could be exposed to liability in
connection with material posted to our websites by users and
other third parties. These claims, whether brought in the United
States or abroad, could divert management time and attention
away from our business and result in significant costs to
investigate and defend, regardless of the merit of these claims.
In addition, if we become subject to these types of claims and
are not successful in our defense, we may be forced to pay
substantial damages.
Wireless
devices and mobile phones are increasingly being used to access
the Internet, and our online marketing services may not be as
effective when accessed through these devices, which could cause
harm to our business.
The number of people who access the Internet through devices
other than personal computers has increased substantially in the
last few years. Our online marketing services were designed for
persons accessing the Internet on a desktop or laptop computer.
The smaller screens, lower resolution graphics and less
convenient typing capabilities of these devices may make it more
difficult for visitors to respond to our offerings. In addition,
the cost of mobile advertising is relatively high and may not be
cost-effective for our services. If our services continue to be
less effective or economically attractive for clients seeking to
engage in marketing through these devices and this segment of
web traffic grows at the expense of traditional computer
Internet access, we will experience difficulty attracting
website visitors and attracting and retaining clients and our
operating results and business will be harmed.
We may
not succeed in expanding our businesses outside the United
States, which may limit our future growth.
One potential area of growth for us is in the international
markets. However, we have limited experience in marketing,
selling and supporting our services outside of the United States
and we may not be successful in introducing or marketing our
services abroad. There are risks inherent in conducting business
in international markets, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the adaptation of technologies and services to foreign
clients preferences and customs;
|
|
|
|
application of foreign laws and regulations to us, including
marketing and privacy regulations;
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign political and economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
tariffs and other trade barriers, fluctuations in currency
exchange rates and potentially adverse tax consequences;
|
|
|
|
language barriers or cultural differences;
|
|
|
|
reduced or limited protection for intellectual property rights
in foreign jurisdictions;
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs in staffing and managing or overseeing
foreign operations; and
|
|
|
|
education of potential clients who may not be familiar with
online marketing.
|
If we are unable to successfully expand and market our services
abroad, our business and future growth may be harmed and we may
incur costs that may not lead to future revenue.
We
rely on Internet bandwidth and data center providers and other
third parties for key aspects of the process of providing
services to our clients, and any failure or interruption in the
services and products provided by these third parties could harm
our business.
We rely on third-party vendors, including data center and
Internet bandwidth providers. Any disruption in the network
access or co-location services provided by these third-party
providers or any failure of these third-party providers to
handle current or higher volumes of use could significantly harm
our business. Any financial or other difficulties our providers
face may have negative effects on our business, the nature and
extent of which we cannot predict. We exercise little control
over these third-party vendors, which increases our
vulnerability to problems with the services they provide. We
license technology and related databases from third parties to
facilitate analysis and storage of data and delivery of
offerings. We have experienced interruptions and delays in
service and availability for data centers, bandwidth and other
technologies in the
22
past. Any errors, failures, interruptions or delays experienced
in connection with these third-party technologies and services
could adversely affect our business and could expose us to
liabilities to third parties.
Our systems also heavily depend on the availability of
electricity, which also comes from third-party providers. If we
or third-party data centers which we utilize were to experience
a major power outage, we would have to rely on
back-up
generators. These
back-up
generators may not operate properly through a major power outage
and their fuel supply could also be inadequate during a major
power outage or disruptive event. Furthermore, we do not
currently have backup generators at our Foster City, California
headquarters. Information systems such as ours may be disrupted
by even brief power outages, or by the fluctuations in power
resulting from switches to and from
back-up
generators. This could give rise to obligations to certain of
our clients which could have an adverse effect on our results
for the period of time in which any disruption of utility
services to us occurs.
Interruption
or failure of our information technology and communications
systems could impair our ability to effectively deliver our
services, which could cause us to lose clients and harm our
operating results.
Our delivery of marketing and media services depends on the
continuing operation of our technology infrastructure and
systems. Any damage to or failure of our systems could result in
interruptions in our ability to deliver offerings quickly and
accurately
and/or
process visitors responses emanating from our various web
presences. Interruptions in our service could reduce our revenue
and profits, and our reputation could be damaged if people
believe our systems are unreliable. Our systems and operations
are vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes,
terrorist attacks, floods, fires, power loss, break-ins,
hardware or software failures, telecommunications failures,
computer viruses or other attempts to harm our systems, and
similar events.
We lease or maintain server space in various locations,
including in San Francisco, California. Our California
facilities are located in areas with a high risk of major
earthquakes. Our facilities are also subject to break-ins,
sabotage and intentional acts of vandalism, and to potential
disruptions if the operators of these facilities have financial
difficulties. Some of our systems are not fully redundant, and
our disaster recovery planning cannot account for all
eventualities. The occurrence of a natural disaster, a decision
to close a facility we are using without adequate notice for
financial reasons or other unanticipated problems at our
facilities could result in lengthy interruptions in our service.
Any unscheduled interruption in our service would result in an
immediate loss of revenue. If we experience frequent or
persistent system failures, the attractiveness of our
technologies and services to clients and website publishers
could be permanently harmed. The steps we have taken to increase
the reliability and redundancy of our systems are expensive,
reduce our operating margin, and may not be successful in
reducing the frequency or duration of unscheduled interruptions.
Any
constraints on the capacity of our technology infrastructure
could delay the effectiveness of our operations or result in
system failures, which would result in the loss of clients and
harm our business and results of operations.
Our future success depends in part on the efficient performance
of our software and technology infrastructure. As the numbers of
websites and Internet users increase, our technology
infrastructure may not be able to meet the increased demand. A
sudden and unexpected increase in the volume of user responses
could strain the capacity of our technology infrastructure. Any
capacity constraints we experience could lead to slower response
times or system failures and adversely affect the availability
of websites and the level of user responses received, which
could result in the loss of clients or revenue or harm to our
business and results of operations.
We
could lose clients if we fail to detect click-through or other
fraud on advertisements in a manner that is acceptable to our
clients.
We are exposed to the risk of fraudulent clicks or actions on
our websites or our third-party publishers websites. We
may in the future have to refund revenue that our clients have
paid to us and that was later attributed to, or suspected to be
caused by, fraud. Click-through fraud occurs when an individual
clicks on an
23
ad displayed on a website or an automated system is used to
create such clicks with the intent of generating the revenue
share payment to the publisher rather than to view the
underlying content. Action fraud occurs when on-line forms are
completed with false or fictitious information in an effort to
increase the compensable actions in respect of which a web
publisher is to be compensated. From time to time we have
experienced fraudulent clicks or actions and we do not charge
our clients for such fraudulent clicks or actions when they are
detected. It is conceivable that this activity could negatively
affect our profitability, and this type of fraudulent act could
hurt our reputation. If fraudulent clicks or actions are not
detected, the affected clients may experience a reduced return
on their investment in our marketing programs, which could lead
the clients to become dissatisfied with our campaigns, and in
turn, lead to loss of clients and the related revenue.
Additionally, we have from time to time had to terminate
relationships with web publishers who we believed to have
engaged in fraud and we may have to do so in future. Termination
of such relationships entails a loss of revenue associated with
the legitimate actions or clicks generated by such web
publishers.
We
will incur significant increased costs as a result of operating
as a public company, which may adversely affect our operating
results and financial condition.
As a public company, we will incur significant accounting, legal
and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.
We will incur costs associated with our public company reporting
requirements. We also anticipate that we will incur costs
associated with corporate governance requirements, including
requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules implemented by the SEC and
The NASDAQ Global Market. We expect these rules and regulations
to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make
some activities more time-consuming and costly. Our management
and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of
time to these compliance initiatives. Furthermore, these laws
and regulations could make it more difficult or more costly for
us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and
officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept
reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher
costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of
these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to
attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of
directors, our board committees or as executive officers. We
cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional
costs we may incur to respond to these requirements. We are
currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to
these rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of
additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.
In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other
things, that we maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In
particular, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011, we
must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our
internal control over financial reporting to allow management
and our independent registered public accounting firm to report
on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, or Section 404. Our compliance with Section 404
will require that we incur substantial expense and expend
significant management time on compliance-related issues.
If we
fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our
ability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely
basis could be impaired, which would adversely affect our
ability to operate our business.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. We may in the future discover
areas of our internal financial and accounting controls and
procedures that need improvement. Our internal control over
financial reporting will not prevent or detect all error and all
fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the control systems objectives will be met. Because
of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all
control issues and instances of fraud will be detected. If we
are unable to maintain proper and effective internal controls,
we may not be able to produce accurate financial
24
statements on a timely basis, which could adversely affect our
ability to operate our business and could result in regulatory
action.
Risks
Related to This Offering and Ownership of Our Common
Stock
Our
stock price may be volatile, and you may not be able to resell
shares of our common stock at or above the price you
paid.
Prior to this offering there has been no public market for
shares of our common stock, and an active public market for our
shares may not develop or be sustained after this offering. We
and the representatives of the underwriters have determined the
offering price of our common stock through negotiation. This
price does not necessarily reflect the price at which investors
in the market will be willing to buy and sell our shares
following this offering. In addition, the trading price of our
common stock following this offering could be highly volatile
and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various
factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors
include those discussed in this Risk Factors section
of this prospectus and others such as:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities
analysts;
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of new services,
significant contracts, commercial relationships, acquisitions or
capital commitments;
|
|
|
|
developments with respect to intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop and market new and enhanced products on a
timely basis;
|
|
|
|
our commencement of, or involvement in, litigation;
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or in the status of our
regulatory approvals; and
|
|
|
|
a slowdown in our industry or the general economy.
|
In recent years, the stock market in general, and the market for
technology and Internet-based companies in particular, has
experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have
often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating
performance of those companies. Broad market and industry
factors may seriously affect the market price of our common
stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. These
fluctuations may be even more pronounced in the trading market
for our stock shortly following this offering. In addition, in
the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market
and the market price of a particular companys securities,
securities class action litigation has often been instituted
against these companies. Such litigation, if instituted against
us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our
managements attention and resources.
If
securities or industry analysts do not publish research or
reports about our business, or if they issue an adverse or
misleading opinion regarding our stock, our stock price and
trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by
the research and reports that industry or securities analysts
publish about us or our business. We do not currently have and
may never obtain research coverage by securities and industry
analysts. If no securities or industry analysts commence
coverage of our company, the trading price for our stock would
be negatively impacted. In the event we obtain securities or
industry analyst coverage, if any of the analysts who cover us
issue an adverse opinion regarding our stock, our stock price
would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease
coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us
regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets,
which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to
decline.
Our
directors, executive officers and principal stockholders and
their respective affiliates will continue to have substantial
control over us after this offering and could delay or prevent a
change in corporate control.
After this offering, our directors, executive officers and
holders of more than 5% of our common stock, together with their
affiliates, will beneficially own, in the aggregate,
approximately 59% of our outstanding
25
common stock, assuming no exercise of the underwriters
option to purchase additional shares of our common stock in this
offering. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, will
continue to have substantial control over the outcome of matters
submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the
election of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of
all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, these
stockholders, acting together, will continue to have significant
influence over the management and affairs of our company.
Accordingly, this concentration of ownership may have the effect
of:
|
|
|
|
|
delaying, deferring or preventing a change in corporate control;
|
|
|
|
impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business
combination involving us; or
|
|
|
|
discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or
otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.
|
Future
sales of shares by existing stockholders could cause our stock
price to decline.
If our existing stockholders sell, or indicate an intent to
sell, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public
market after the
180-day
contractual
lock-up,
which period may be extended in certain limited circumstances,
and other legal restrictions on resale discussed in this
prospectus lapse, the trading price of our common stock could
decline significantly and could decline below the initial public
offering price. Based on shares outstanding as of
December 31, 2009, upon the completion of this offering, we
will have outstanding 44,912,597 shares of common stock,
assuming no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option and no exercise of outstanding options. Of these shares,
10,000,000 shares of common stock, plus any shares sold
upon exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option,
will be immediately freely tradable, without restriction, in the
public market. The underwriters may, in their sole discretion,
permit our officers, directors, employees and current
stockholders to sell shares prior to the expiration of the
lock-up
agreements.
After the
lock-up
agreements pertaining to this offering expire and based on
shares outstanding as of December 31, 2009, the remaining
34,912,597 shares will be eligible for sale in the public
market. In addition, (i) the 11,504,767 shares subject
to outstanding options under our equity incentive plans as of
December 31, 2009 and (ii) the shares reserved for
future issuance under our equity incentive plans will become
eligible for sale in the public market in the future, subject to
certain legal and contractual limitations. If these additional
shares are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold,
in the public market, the price of our common stock could
decline substantially.
Purchasers
of common stock in this offering will experience immediate and
substantial dilution in the book value of their
investment.
The initial offering price of our common stock is substantially
higher than the expected net tangible book value per share of
our common stock immediately after this offering. Therefore, if
you purchase our common stock in this offering, you will incur
an immediate dilution of $13.15 in net tangible book value per
share from the price you paid, based on our shares outstanding
as of December 31, 2009. In addition, following this
offering, purchasers in the offering will have contributed
approximately 77% of the total consideration paid by
stockholders to us to purchase shares of our common stock, based
on our shares outstanding as of December 31, 2009. In
addition, if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase
additional shares or if outstanding options are exercised, you
will experience further dilution. For a further description of
the dilution that you will experience immediately after this
offering, see the section of this prospectus entitled
Dilution.
We
have broad discretion to determine how to use the funds raised
in this offering, and may use them in ways that may not enhance
our operating results or the price of our common
stock.
Our management will have broad discretion over the use of
proceeds from this offering, and we could spend the proceeds
from this offering in ways our stockholders may not agree with
or that do not yield a favorable return. We intend to use the
net proceeds from this offering for working capital, capital
expenditures and other general corporate purposes. We may also
use a portion of the net proceeds to make repayments on our debt
or acquire other businesses, products or technologies. If we do
not invest or apply the proceeds of
26
this offering in ways that improve our operating results, we may
fail to achieve expected financial results, which could cause
our stock price to decline.
Provisions
in our charter documents following this offering, under Delaware
law and in contractual obligations, could discourage a takeover
that stockholders may consider favorable and may lead to
entrenchment of management.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws
that will be in effect as of the closing of this offering will
contain provisions that could have the effect of delaying or
preventing changes in control or changes in our management
without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions
will include:
|
|
|
|
|
a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms,
which may delay the ability of stockholders to change the
membership of a majority of our board of directors;
|
|
|
|
no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits
the ability of minority stockholders to elect director
candidates;
|
|
|
|
the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a
director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board
of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director,
which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on
our board of directors;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our board of directors to determine to issue
shares of preferred stock and to determine the price and other
terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights,
without stockholder approval, which could be used to
significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer;
|
|
|
|
a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which
forces stockholder action to be taken at an annual or special
meeting of our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
the requirement that a special meeting of stockholders may be
called only by the chairman of the board of directors, the chief
executive officer or the board of directors, which may delay the
ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal
or to take action, including the removal of directors; and
|
|
|
|
advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with in
order to nominate candidates to our board of directors or to
propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders
meeting, which may discourage or deter a potential acquiror from
conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the
acquirors own slate of directors or otherwise attempting
to obtain control of us.
|
We are subject to certain anti-takeover provisions under
Delaware law. Under Delaware law, a corporation may not, in
general, engage in a business combination with any holder of 15%
or more of its capital stock unless the holder has held the
stock for three years or, among other things, the board of
directors has approved the transaction. For a description of our
capital stock, see Description of Capital Stock.
We do
not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and,
consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your
investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our
common stock.
We do not intend to declare and pay dividends on our capital
stock for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to invest
our future earnings, if any, to fund our growth. Additionally,
the terms of our credit facility restrict our ability to pay
dividends. Therefore, you are not likely to receive any
dividends on your common stock for the foreseeable future.
27
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus, particularly in the sections titled
Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and
Business, contains forward-looking statements that
involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements
other than statements of historical facts contained in this
prospectus, including statements regarding our future financial
condition, business strategy and plans and objectives of
management for future operations, are forward-looking
statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terminology such as believe,
may, might, objective,
estimate, continue,
anticipate, intend, should,
plan, expect, predict,
potential, or the negative of these terms or other
similar expressions. We have based these forward-looking
statements largely on our current expectations and projections
about future events and financial trends that we believe may
affect our financial condition, results of operations, business
strategy and financial needs. These forward-looking statements
are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions
described under the section titled Risk Factors and
elsewhere in this prospectus, regarding, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
our immature industry and relatively new business model;
|
|
|
|
our ability to manage our growth effectively;
|
|
|
|
our dependence on Internet search companies to attract Internet
visitors;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully manage any future acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
our dependence on a small number of large clients and our
dependence on a small number of client verticals for a majority
of our revenue;
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain qualified employees and key
personnel;
|
|
|
|
our ability to accurately forecast our operating results and
appropriately plan our expenses;
|
|
|
|
our ability to compete in our industry;
|
|
|
|
our ability to enhance and maintain our client and vendor
relationships;
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop new services and enhancements and
features to meet new demands from our clients;
|
|
|
|
our ability to raise additional capital in the future, if needed;
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions in our domestic and potential future
international markets;
|
|
|
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property rights; and
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the use of proceeds from this
offering.
|
These risks are not exhaustive. Other sections of this
prospectus may include additional factors that could adversely
impact our business and financial performance. These statements
reflect our current views with respect to future events and are
based on assumptions and subject to risk and uncertainties.
Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly-changing
environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is
not possible for our management to predict all risk factors, nor
can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the
extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause
actual results to differ materially from those contained in any
forward-looking statements.
You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as
predictions of future events. The events and circumstances
reflected in the forward-looking statements may not be achieved
or occur. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in
the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot
guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assume
responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the
forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we
undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking
statements for any reason after the date of this prospectus to
conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our
expectations.
You should read this prospectus and the documents that we
reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the
registration statement on
Form S-1,
of which this prospectus is a part, that we have filed with the
SEC with the understanding that our actual future results,
levels of activity, performance and achievements may be
materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our
forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.
28
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from the sale of our
common stock in this offering will be approximately
$137.2 million, or approximately $158.1 million if the
underwriters exercise their right to purchase additional shares
of common stock from us to cover over-allotments in full, and
after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses.
We currently intend to use our net proceeds from this offering
for working capital, capital expenditures and other general
corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the net
proceeds to repay debt, including our credit facility, or
acquire other businesses, products or technologies.
The expected use of net proceeds of this offering represents our
current intentions based upon our present plans and business
conditions. The amounts we actually expend in these areas may
vary significantly from our current intentions and will depend
upon a number of factors, including future sales growth, success
of our engineering efforts, cash generated from future
operations, if any, and actual expenses to operate our business.
As of the date of this prospectus, we cannot specify with
certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds to be
received upon the closing of this offering. Accordingly, our
management will have broad discretion in the application of the
net proceeds, and investors will be relying on the judgment of
our management regarding the application of the net proceeds of
this offering.
The amount and timing of our expenditures will depend on several
factors, including the amount and timing of our spending on
sales and marketing activities and research and development
activities, as well as our use of cash for other corporate
activities. Pending the uses described above, we intend to
invest the net proceeds in a variety of capital preservation
instruments, including short-term, interest-bearing, investment
grade instruments, certificates of deposit or direct or
guaranteed obligations of the U.S. government.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any
future earnings to support our operations and finance the growth
and development of our business. We do not intend to pay cash
dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any
future determination related to dividend policy will be made at
the discretion of our board of directors. The loan agreement for
our credit facility contains a prohibition on the payout of cash
dividends.
29
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our cash, cash equivalents,
current debt and capitalization as of December 31, 2009
(unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis;
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the conversion of
all outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock into
21,176,533 shares of common stock effective immediately
prior to the closing of this offering; and
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma as adjusted basis to reflect, in addition, the
filing of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
and the sale of 10,000,000 shares of common stock that we
are offering at the initial public offering price of $15.00 per
share, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
You should read the information in this table together with our
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations appearing elsewhere in
this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma as
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
34,139
|
|
|
$
|
34,139
|
|
|
$
|
171,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt, current
|
|
$
|
16,208
|
|
|
$
|
16,208
|
|
|
$
|
16,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt, noncurrent
|
|
$
|
89,487
|
|
|
$
|
89,487
|
|
|
$
|
89,487
|
|
Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value,
35,500,000 shares authorized, 21,176,533 shares issued
and outstanding, actual; 35,500,000 shares authorized, no
shares issued and outstanding, pro forma; no shares authorized,
no shares issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
43,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, no shares authorized,
issued and outstanding, actual; no shares authorized,
issued and outstanding, pro forma; 5,000,000 shares authorized,
no shares issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 50,500,000 shares
authorized, 15,913,516 shares issued and
13,736,064 shares outstanding, actual;
50,500,000 shares authorized, 37,090,049 shares issued
and 34,912,597 shares outstanding, pro forma;
100,000,000 shares authorized, 47,090,049 shares
issued and 44,912,597 shares outstanding, pro forma as
adjusted
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
30,279
|
|
|
|
73,661
|
|
|
|
210,817
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost (2,177,452 shares)
|
|
|
(7,779
|
)
|
|
|
(7,779
|
)
|
|
|
(7,779
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
68,503
|
|
|
|
68,503
|
|
|
|
68,503
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
91,032
|
|
|
|
134,435
|
|
|
|
271,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
223,922
|
|
|
$
|
223,922
|
|
|
$
|
361,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
The outstanding share information in the table above is based on
34,912,597 shares of common stock outstanding as of
December 31, 2009, and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 11,504,767 shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of outstanding stock options as of
December 31, 2009 pursuant to our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan and having a weighted-average exercise price of $9.3429 per
share;
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 587,717 additional shares of common stock
reserved for future issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan as of December 31, 2009; provided, however, that
immediately upon the execution and delivery of the underwriting
agreement for this offering, our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan will
terminate so that no further awards may be granted under our
2008 Equity Incentive Plan, and the shares then remaining and
reserved for future issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan shall become available for future issuance under our 2010
Equity Incentive Plan; and
|
|
|
|
the shares reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan and up to 300,000 additional shares of common
stock reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Award Plan, as well as any automatic
increases in the number of shares of common stock reserved for
future issuance under each of these benefit plans, which will
become effective immediately upon the execution and delivery of
the underwriting agreement for this offering.
|
31
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock in this offering, your
interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between
the initial public offering price per share of our common stock
and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share
of our common stock after this offering. As of December 31,
2009, our pro forma net tangible book value was
$(54.1 million), or $(1.55) per share of common stock. Our
pro forma net tangible book value per share represents the
amount of our total tangible assets reduced by the amount of our
total liabilities and divided by the total number of shares of
our common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2009, after
giving effect to the automatic conversion of all outstanding
shares of convertible preferred stock into shares of common
stock immediately prior to the closing of this offering. After
giving effect to our sale in this offering of
10,000,000 shares of common stock at the initial public
offering price of $15.00 per share, and after deducting the
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible
book value as of December 31, 2009 would have been
approximately $83.1 million, or $1.85 per share. This
represents an immediate increase of net tangible book value of
$3.40 per share to our existing stockholders and an immediate
dilution of $13.15 per share to investors purchasing common
stock in this offering. The following table illustrates this per
share dilution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial public offering price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share as of
December 31, 2009, before giving effect to this offering
|
|
$
|
(1.55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per
share attributed to new investors purchasing shares in this
offering
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share after giving effect
to this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional
shares of our common stock from us in full in this offering, the
pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after
the offering would be $2.24 per share, the increase in pro forma
as adjusted net tangible book value per share to existing
stockholders would be $3.79 per share and the dilution to new
investors purchasing shares in this offering would be $12.76 per
share.
The following table summarizes on a pro forma as adjusted basis
as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
the total number of shares of common stock purchased from us by
our existing stockholders and by new investors purchasing shares
in this offering;
|
|
|
|
the total approximate consideration paid to us by our existing
stockholders and by new investors purchasing shares in this
offering, based on the initial public offering price of $15.00
per share (before deducting the underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us in
connection with this offering); and
|
|
|
|
the average price per share paid by existing stockholders and by
new investors purchasing shares in this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
34,912,597
|
|
|
|
78
|
%
|
|
$
|
44,543,000
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
$
|
1.28
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
150,000,000
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
44,912,597
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
194,543,000
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional
shares of our common stock in full, our existing stockholders
would own 75% and our new investors would own 25% of the total
number of shares of common stock outstanding upon completion of
this offering. The total consideration paid to us by our
existing
32
stockholders would be approximately $44.5 million, or 21%,
and the total consideration paid to us by our new investors
would be $172.5 million, or 79%.
If all outstanding options under our equity incentive plans were
exercised, then our existing stockholders, including the holders
of these options, would own 82% and our new investors would own
18% of the total number of shares of our common stock
outstanding upon the closing of this offering. In such event,
the total consideration paid by our existing stockholders,
including the holders of these options, would be approximately
$152.0 million, or 50%, the total consideration paid by our
new investors would be $150.0 million, or 50%, the average
price per share paid by our existing stockholders would be $3.28
and the average price per share paid by our new investors would
be $15.00.
The above discussion and tables are based on
34,912,597 shares of common stock outstanding as of
December 31, 2009, and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 11,504,767 shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of outstanding stock options as of
December 31, 2009 pursuant to our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan and having a weighted-average exercise price of $9.3429 per
share;
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 587,717 additional shares of common stock
reserved for future issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan as of December 31, 2009; provided, however, that
immediately upon the execution and delivery of the underwriting
agreement for this offering, our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan will
terminate so that no further awards may be granted under our
2008 Equity Incentive Plan, and the shares then remaining and
reserved for future issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan shall become available for future issuance under our 2010
Non-Employee Directors Stock Award Plan; and
|
|
|
|
the shares reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan and up to 300,000 additional shares of common
stock reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Award Plan, as well as any automatic
increases in the number of shares of common stock reserved for
future issuance under each of these benefit plans, which will
become effective immediately upon the execution and delivery of
the underwriting agreement for this offering.
|
33
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data should be
read together with our consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected
consolidated financial data in this section is not intended to
replace our consolidated financial statements and the related
notes. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of
our future results and our interim results are not necessarily
indicative of the results that should be expected for the full
fiscal year.
We derived the consolidated statements of operations data for
the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the
consolidated balance sheets data as of June 30, 2008 and
2009 from our audited consolidated financial statements
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The consolidated
statements of operations data for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2005 and 2006 and the consolidated balance sheets
data as of June 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 are derived from
our audited consolidated financial statements, which are not
included in this prospectus. The consolidated statements of
operations data for the six months ended December 31, 2008
and 2009 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2009 are derived from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
109,556
|
|
|
$
|
142,408
|
|
|
$
|
167,370
|
|
|
$
|
192,030
|
|
|
$
|
260,527
|
|
|
$
|
122,913
|
|
|
$
|
155,515
|
|
Cost of revenue(1)
|
|
|
65,653
|
|
|
|
85,820
|
|
|
|
108,945
|
|
|
|
130,869
|
|
|
|
181,593
|
|
|
|
88,250
|
|
|
|
111,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
43,903
|
|
|
|
56,588
|
|
|
|
58,425
|
|
|
|
61,161
|
|
|
|
78,934
|
|
|
|
34,663
|
|
|
|
43,911
|
|
Operating expenses:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
12,644
|
|
|
|
17,265
|
|
|
|
14,094
|
|
|
|
14,051
|
|
|
|
14,887
|
|
|
|
7,480
|
|
|
|
9,209
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
5,734
|
|
|
|
7,166
|
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
|
|
12,409
|
|
|
|
16,154
|
|
|
|
8,423
|
|
|
|
7,615
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,842
|
|
|
|
6,835
|
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
13,371
|
|
|
|
13,172
|
|
|
|
6,907
|
|
|
|
9,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
23,220
|
|
|
|
31,266
|
|
|
|
34,021
|
|
|
|
39,831
|
|
|
|
44,213
|
|
|
|
22,810
|
|
|
|
26,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
20,683
|
|
|
|
25,322
|
|
|
|
24,404
|
|
|
|
21,330
|
|
|
|
34,721
|
|
|
|
11,853
|
|
|
|
17,443
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(3,544
|
)
|
|
|
(1,870
|
)
|
|
|
(1,629
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
(3,538
|
)
|
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
|
(1,327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
21,196
|
|
|
|
25,362
|
|
|
|
25,438
|
|
|
|
21,743
|
|
|
|
31,183
|
|
|
|
9,920
|
|
|
|
16,116
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
|
(8,136
|
)
|
|
|
(9,773
|
)
|
|
|
(9,828
|
)
|
|
|
(8,876
|
)
|
|
|
(13,909
|
)
|
|
|
(4,266
|
)
|
|
|
(7,193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
13,060
|
|
|
|
15,589
|
|
|
|
15,610
|
|
|
|
12,867
|
|
|
|
17,274
|
|
|
|
5,654
|
|
|
|
8,923
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,060
|
|
|
$
|
13,769
|
|
|
$
|
15,610
|
|
|
$
|
12,867
|
|
|
$
|
17,274
|
|
|
$
|
5,654
|
|
|
$
|
8,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: 8% non-cumulative dividends on convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(3,218
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
Undistributed earnings allocated to convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(6,240
|
)
|
|
|
(6,591
|
)
|
|
|
(7,690
|
)
|
|
|
(5,925
|
)
|
|
|
(8,599
|
)
|
|
|
(2,468
|
)
|
|
|
(4,454
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders basic
|
|
$
|
3,602
|
|
|
$
|
3,902
|
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
3,666
|
|
|
$
|
5,399
|
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
$
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders basic
|
|
$
|
3,602
|
|
|
$
|
3,902
|
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
3,666
|
|
|
$
|
5,399
|
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
$
|
2,831
|
|
Undistributed earnings re-allocated to common stock
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stockholders diluted
|
|
$
|
4,038
|
|
|
$
|
4,427
|
|
|
$
|
5,166
|
|
|
$
|
4,026
|
|
|
$
|
5,798
|
|
|
$
|
1,672
|
|
|
$
|
3,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic net income per
share
|
|
|
12,069
|
|
|
|
12,411
|
|
|
|
12,789
|
|
|
|
13,104
|
|
|
|
13,294
|
|
|
|
13,282
|
|
|
|
13,463
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net income per
share
|
|
|
14,543
|
|
|
|
15,295
|
|
|
|
15,263
|
|
|
|
15,325
|
|
|
|
14,971
|
|
|
|
15,103
|
|
|
|
16,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income per share:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing pro forma basic net
income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,640
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing pro forma diluted net
income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,346
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,916
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
1,490
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
3,378
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements
included in this prospectus for an explanation of the method
used to calculate basic and diluted net loss per share and pro
forma basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock. |
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
19,418
|
|
|
$
|
30,593
|
|
|
$
|
26,765
|
|
|
$
|
24,953
|
|
|
$
|
25,182
|
|
|
$
|
34,139
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
39,859
|
|
|
|
36,294
|
|
|
|
42,769
|
|
|
|
17,022
|
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
|
|
31,527
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
71,350
|
|
|
|
101,203
|
|
|
|
118,536
|
|
|
|
179,746
|
|
|
|
212,878
|
|
|
|
281,845
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
26,657
|
|
|
|
39,567
|
|
|
|
37,831
|
|
|
|
86,032
|
|
|
|
96,289
|
|
|
|
147,410
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,216
|
|
|
|
10,250
|
|
|
|
51,654
|
|
|
|
57,240
|
|
|
|
105,695
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
4,246
|
|
|
|
18,350
|
|
|
|
37,312
|
|
|
|
50,311
|
|
|
|
73,186
|
|
|
|
91,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
23,200
|
|
|
$
|
21,659
|
|
|
$
|
25,197
|
|
|
$
|
24,751
|
|
|
$
|
32,570
|
|
|
$
|
9,371
|
|
|
$
|
16,077
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,466
|
|
|
|
7,208
|
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
11,727
|
|
|
|
15,978
|
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
|
|
8,603
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
5,671
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
24,290
|
|
|
$
|
32,619
|
|
|
$
|
36,112
|
|
|
$
|
36,279
|
|
|
$
|
56,872
|
|
|
$
|
23,114
|
|
|
$
|
33,139
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income less interest income
plus interest expense, provision for taxes, depreciation
expense, amortization expense, stock-based compensation expense
and foreign-exchange (loss) gain. Please see Summary
Consolidated Financial Data Adjusted EBITDA
for more information and for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
to our net income calculated in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. |
36
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion of our financial
condition and results of operations in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The following discussion contains
forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and
beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those
discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could
cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed
below and elsewhere in this prospectus, particularly in the
sections titled Risk Factors and Special Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
Overview
QuinStreet is a leader in vertical marketing and media on the
Internet. We have built a strong set of capabilities to engage
Internet visitors with targeted media and to connect our
marketing clients with their potential customers online. We
focus on serving clients in large, information-intensive
industry verticals where relevant, targeted media and offerings
help visitors make informed choices, find the products that
match their needs, and thus become qualified customer prospects
for our clients.
We deliver cost-effective marketing results to our clients,
predictably and scalably, most typically in the form of a
qualified lead or click. These leads or clicks can then convert
into a customer or sale for the client at a rate that results in
an acceptable marketing cost to them. We get paid by clients
primarily when we deliver qualified leads or clicks as defined
by our agreements with them. Because we bear the costs of media,
our programs must deliver a value to our clients and a media
yield, or our ability to generate an acceptable margin on our
media costs, that provides a sound financial outcome for us. Our
general process is:
|
|
|
|
|
We own or access targeted media;
|
|
|
|
We run advertisements or other forms of marketing messages and
programs in that media to create visitor responses or clicks
through to client offerings;
|
|
|
|
We match these responses or clicks to client offerings or brands
that meet visitor interests or needs, converting visitors into
qualified leads or clicks; and
|
|
|
|
We optimize client matches and media yield such that we achieve
desired results for clients and a sound financial outcome for us.
|
Our primary financial objective has been and remains creating
revenue growth, from sustainable sources, at target levels of
profitability. Our primary financial objective is not to
maximize profits, but rather to achieve target levels of
profitability while investing in various growth initiatives, as
we believe we are in the early stages of a large, long-term
market. We have been successful in increasing revenue each year
since our inception. We became profitable in 2002 and have
remained so since that time.
Our Direct Marketing Services, or DMS, business accounted for
95%, 98%, 99% and 99% of our net revenue in fiscal years 2007,
2008 and 2009 and the first six months of fiscal year 2010,
respectively. Our DMS business derives substantially all of its
net revenue from fees earned through the delivery of qualified
leads and clicks to our clients. Through a deep vertical focus,
targeted media presence and our technology platform, we are able
to reliably deliver targeted, measurable marketing results to
our clients.
Our two largest client verticals are education and financial
services. Our education vertical has historically been our
largest vertical, representing 78%, 74%, 58% and 49% of net
revenue in fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the first six
months of fiscal year 2010, respectively. DeVry Inc., a
for-profit education company and our largest client, accounted
for 22%, 23%, 19%, and 12% of total net revenue for fiscal years
2007, 2008 and 2009 and the first six months of fiscal year
2010, respectively. Our financial services vertical, which we
have grown both organically and through acquisitions,
represented 7%, 11%, 31% and 41% of net revenue in fiscal years
2007, 2008 and 2009 and the first six months of fiscal year
2010, respectively. Other DMS verticals, consisting primarily of
home services,
business-to-business,
or B2B, and
37
healthcare, represented 10%, 13%, 10% and 9% of net revenue in
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the first six months of
fiscal year 2010, respectively.
In addition, we derived 5%, 2%, 1% and 1% of our net revenue in
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the first six months of
fiscal year 2010, respectively, from the provision of a hosted
solution and related services for clients in the direct selling
industry, also referred to as our Direct Selling Services, or
DSS, business.
We have generated substantially all of our revenue from sales to
clients in the United States.
We are subject to economic or business factors that affect our
client verticals. For instance, presently, clients in particular
verticals such as financial services, particularly mortgage,
credit cards and deposits, small- to medium-sized business
customers and home services are facing very difficult conditions
and their marketing spending has been negatively affected. In
general, we address challenges created by these adverse economic
or business conditions by shifting investment and resources to
other client verticals that might be less challenged or by
focusing on opportunities with specific clients and subsets of
client verticals that might be less affected by those
challenges. However, we also invest in client verticals that may
face near-term challenges but present long-term growth potential.
We face an additional challenge with regard to DeVry, our
largest client, which accounted for approximately 19% and 12% of
our net revenue for fiscal year 2009 and the first six months of
fiscal year 2010, respectively. DeVry has recently retained an
advertising agency and has reduced its purchases of leads from
us. We have been addressing this challenge by working with DeVry
and the agency to understand their evolving needs and strategies
and how we can best serve them going forward. In addition, we
have been expanding our business with other clients in our
education client vertical. We are also expanding our client base
in education to replace visitor matches previously delivered to
DeVry.
Trends
Affecting our Business
Seasonality
Our results from our education client vertical are subject to
significant fluctuation as a result of seasonality. In
particular, our quarters ending December 31 (our second fiscal
quarter) typically demonstrate seasonal weakness. In those
quarters, there is lower availability of lead supply from some
forms of media during the holiday period and our education
clients often request fewer leads due to holiday staffing. In
our quarters ending March 31, this trend generally reverses
with better lead availability and often new budgets at the
beginning of the year for our clients with financial years
ending December 31. For example, in the quarters ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009 net revenue from our
education clients declined 13% and 10%, respectively, from the
previous quarter.
Acquisitions
Beginning in fiscal year 2008, we executed on our strategy to
increase the depth within our existing verticals and diversify
our business among these verticals by substantially increasing
our spending on acquisitions of businesses and technologies. For
example, in February 2008, we acquired ReliableRemodeler.com,
Inc., or ReliableRemodeler, an Oregon-based company specializing
in online home renovation and contractor referrals for
$17.5 million in cash and $8.0 million in
non-interest-bearing, unsecured promissory notes, in an effort
to increase our presence within our home services vertical. In
April 2008, we acquired Cyberspace Communication Corporation, an
Oklahoma-based online marketing company doing business as
SureHits, for $27.5 million in cash and $18.0 million
in potential earn-out payments, in an effort to increase our
presence within the financial services vertical. During fiscal
years 2008 and 2009, in addition to the acquisitions mentioned
above, we acquired an aggregate of 21 and 34 online publishing
businesses, respectively.
In October 2009, we acquired the website business Insure.com
from Life Quote, Inc. for $15.0 million in cash and a
$1.0 million non-interest bearing, unsecured promissory
note. In November 2009, we acquired the website assets of the
Internet.com division of WebMediaBrands, Inc. for $16.0 million
in cash and a $2.0 million non-interest-bearing, unsecured
promissory note.
38
Our acquisition strategy may result in significant fluctuations
in our available working capital from period to period and over
the years. We may use cash, stock or promissory notes to acquire
various businesses or technologies, and we cannot accurately
predict the timing of those acquisitions or the impact on our
cash flows and balance sheet. Large acquisitions or multiple
acquisitions within a particular period may significantly impact
our financial results for that period. We may utilize debt
financing to make acquisitions, which could give rise to higher
interest expense and more restrictive operating covenants. We
may also utilize our stock as consideration, which could result
in substantial dilution.
Client
Verticals
To date, we have generated the majority of our revenue from
clients in our educational vertical. We expect that a majority
of our revenue in fiscal year 2010 will be generated from
clients in our education and financial services client
verticals. A downturn in economic or market conditions adversely
affecting the education industry or the financial services
industry would negatively impact our business and financial
condition. Over the past year, education marketing spending has
remained relatively stable, but we cannot assure you that this
stability will continue. Marketing budgets for clients in our
education vertical are impacted by a number of factors,
including the availability of student financial aid, the
regulation of for-profit financial institutions and economic
conditions. Over the past year, some segments of the financial
services industry, particularly mortgages, credit cards and
deposits, have seen declines in marketing budgets given the
difficult market conditions. These declines may continue or
worsen. In addition, the education and financial services
industries are highly regulated. Changes in regulations or
government actions may negatively impact our clients
marketing practices and budgets and, therefore, adversely affect
our financial results.
Development
and Acquisition of Vertical Media
One of the primary challenges of our business is finding or
creating media that is targeted enough to attract prospects
economically for our clients and at costs that work for our
business model. In order to continue to grow our business, we
must be able to continue to find or develop quality vertical
media on a cost-effective basis. Our inability to find or
develop vertical media could impair our growth or adversely
affect our financial performance.
Basis of
Presentation
General
We operate in two segments: DMS and DSS. For further discussion
or financial information about our reporting segments, see
Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in
this prospectus.
Net
Revenue
DMS. We derive substantially all of our
revenue from fees earned through the delivery of qualified leads
or paid clicks. We deliver targeted and measurable results
through a vertical focus that we classify into the following key
client verticals: education, financial services, home services,
B2B and healthcare.
DSS. We derived approximately 5%, 2%, 1% and
1% of our net revenue in fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and
the first six months of fiscal year 2010, respectively. We
expect DSS to continue to represent an immaterial portion of our
business.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost of revenue consists primarily of media costs, personnel
costs, amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets,
depreciation expense and amortization of internal software
development costs on revenue-producing technologies. Media costs
consist primarily of fees paid to website publishers that are
directly related to a revenue-generating event and PPC ad
purchases from Internet search companies. We pay these Internet
search companies and website publishers on a revenue-share,
cost-per-lead,
or CPL,
cost-per-click,
or CPC, and
cost-per-thousand-impressions,
or CPM, basis. Personnel costs include salaries, bonuses,
stock-based compensation expense and employee benefit costs.
Compensation expense is primarily related to individuals
associated with maintaining our servers and websites, our
editorial staff, client management, creative team, compliance
group and media purchasing analysts. We capitalize costs
associated with software developed or obtained for internal use.
39
Costs incurred in the development phase are capitalized and
amortized in cost of revenue over the products estimated
useful life. We anticipate that our cost of revenue will
increase in absolute dollars.
Operating
Expenses
We classify our operating expenses into three categories:
product development, sales and marketing and general and
administrative. Our operating expenses consist primarily of
personnel costs and, to a lesser extent, professional fees, rent
and allocated costs. Personnel costs for each category of
operating expenses generally include salaries, bonuses and
commissions, stock-based compensation expense and employee
benefit costs.
Product Development. Product development
expenses consist primarily of personnel costs and professional
services fees associated with the development and maintenance of
our technology platforms, development and launching of our
websites, product-based quality assurance and testing. We
believe that continued investment in technology is critical to
attaining our strategic objectives and, as a result, we expect
technology development and enhancement expenses to increase in
absolute dollars in future periods.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing
expenses consist primarily of personnel costs (including
commissions) and, to a lesser extent, allocated overhead,
professional services, advertising, travel and marketing
materials. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in
absolute dollars as we hire additional personnel in sales and
marketing to support our increasing revenue base and product
offerings.
General and Administrative. General and
administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs of
our executive, finance, legal, employee benefits and compliance
and other administrative personnel, as well as accounting and
legal professional services fees and other corporate expenses.
We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in
absolute dollars in future periods as we continue to invest in
corporate infrastructure and incur additional expenses
associated with being a public company, including increased
legal and accounting costs, investor relations costs, higher
insurance premiums and compliance costs associated with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Interest
and Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest and other income (expense), net, consists primarily of
interest income and interest expense. Interest expense is
related to our credit facilities and the promissory notes issued
in connection with our acquisitions. The outstanding balance of
our credit facilities and acquisition-related promissory notes
was $76.8 million and $29.8 million, respectively, as
of December 31, 2009. We expect interest expense to
increase in the near future as we entered into a new credit
facility in January 2010 with a larger borrowing capacity and a
higher rate of interest. Borrowings under our credit facility
could also subsequently increase as we continue to implement our
acquisition strategy. Interest income represents interest
received on our cash and cash equivalents, which we expect will
increase in the near term with the investment of the net
proceeds of this offering.
Income
Tax Expense
We are subject to tax in the United States as well as other tax
jurisdictions or countries in which we conduct business.
Earnings from our limited
non-U.S. activities
are subject to local country income tax and may be subject to
current U.S. income tax.
As of December 31, 2009, we did not have net operating loss
carryforwards for federal income tax purposes and had
approximately $2.8 million in California net operating loss
carryforwards that begin to expire in March 2011, and that we
expect to utilize in an amended return. The California net
operating loss carryforwards will not offset future taxable
income, but may instead result in a refund of historical taxes
paid. As of December 31, 2009, our Japanese subsidiary had
net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $370,000 that
will begin to expire in 2011. These net operating loss
carryforwards were fully reserved as of December 31, 2009.
As of December 31, 2009, we had net deferred tax assets of
$5.5 million. Our net deferred tax assets consist primarily
of accruals, reserves and stock-based compensation expense not
currently deductible for tax
40
purposes. We assess the need for a valuation allowance on the
deferred tax assets by evaluating both positive and negative
evidence that may exist. Any adjustment to the deferred tax
asset valuation allowance would be recorded in the income
statement of the periods that the adjustment is determined to be
required.
On July 1, 2007, we adopted the authoritative accounting
guidance prescribing a threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The
guidance also provides for de-recognition of tax benefits,
classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The
guidance utilizes a two-step approach for evaluating uncertain
tax positions. Step one, Recognition, requires a company to
determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that a
tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit,
including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes,
if any. If a tax position is not considered more likely
than not to be sustained then no benefits of the position
are to be recognized. Step two, Measurement, is based on the
largest amount of benefit, which is more likely than not to be
realized on ultimate settlement.
Effective July 1, 2007, we adopted the accounting guidance
on uncertainties in income tax. The cumulative effect of
adoption to the opening balance of the retained earnings account
was $1,705.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
In presenting our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. generally accepting accounting
principals, or GAAP, we are required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses and related disclosures.
Some of the estimates and assumptions we are required to make
relate to matters that are inherently uncertain as they pertain
to future events. We base these estimates and assumptions on
historical experience or on various other factors that we
believe to be reasonable and appropriate under the
circumstances. On an ongoing basis, we reconsider and evaluate
our estimates and assumptions. Actual results may differ
significantly from these estimates.
We believe that the critical accounting policies listed below
involve our more significant judgments, assumptions and
estimates and, therefore, could have the greatest potential
impact on our consolidated financial statements. In addition, we
believe that a discussion of these policies is necessary to
understand and evaluate the consolidated financial statements
contained in this prospectus.
For further information on our critical and other significant
accounting policies, see Note 2 of our consolidated
financial statements included in this prospectus.
Revenue
Recognition
We derive revenue from two segments: DMS and DSS. DMS revenue,
which constituted 95%, 98% and 99% of our net revenue for fiscal
years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, is derived primarily
from fees that are earned through the delivery of qualified
leads or paid clicks. We recognize revenue when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the
fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably
assured. Delivery is deemed to have occurred at the time a lead
or click is delivered to the client, provided that no
significant obligations remain.
From time to time, we may agree to credit clients for certain
leads or clicks if they fail to meet the contractual or other
guidelines of a particular client. We have established a sales
reserve based on historical experience. To date, our reserve has
been adequate for these credits. The adequacy of this reserve
depends on our ability to estimate the number of credits that we
will grant to our clients. If we were to change any of the
assumptions or judgments made in calculating the amount of the
reserve, it could cause a material change in the net revenue
that we report in a particular period. Our assessment of the
likelihood of collection is also a critical element in
determining the timing of revenue recognition. If we do not
believe that collection is reasonably assured, revenue will be
recognized on the earlier of the date that the collection is
reasonably assured or collection is made.
41
For a portion of our revenue, we have agreements with publishers
of online media used in the generation of leads or clicks. We
receive a fee from our clients and pay a fee to our publishers
either on a revenue-share, CPL, CPC or CPM basis. We are the
primary obligor in the transaction. As a result, the fees paid
by our clients are recognized as revenue and the fees paid to
our publishers are included in cost of revenue.
DSS revenue consists of
(i) set-up
and professional services fees and (ii) usage and hosting
fees. Set-up
and professional service fees that do not provide stand-alone
value to our clients are recognized over the contractual term of
the agreement or the expected client relationship period,
whichever is longer, effective when the application reaches the
go-live date. We define the go-live date
as the date when the application enters into a production
environment or all essential functionalities have been
delivered. We recognize usage and hosting fees on a monthly
basis as earned. Deferred revenue consists of billings or
payments in advance of reaching all the above revenue
recognition criteria, primarily comprising deferred DSS revenue.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Through June 30, 2006, we accounted for our stock-based
employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the
intrinsic value provisions of Accounting Principles Board, or
APB, Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, or APB 25, and related interpretations and complied
with the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock Based Compensation, and SFAS No. 148, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. Under
the intrinsic value method, compensation expense is measured on
the date of the grants as the difference between the fair value
of our common stock and the exercise or purchase price
multiplied by the number of stock options granted.
Effective July 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS 123(R), which
requires non-public companies that used the minimum value method
under SFAS 123 for either recognition or pro forma
disclosures to apply SFAS 123(R) using the
prospective-transition method. As such, we continue to apply the
intrinsic value method to equity awards outstanding at the date
of adoption of SFAS 123(R) that were measured using the
minimum value method. In accordance with SFAS 123(R), we
recognize the compensation cost of employee stock-based awards
granted subsequent to June 30, 2006 in the statement of
operations using the straight-line method over the vesting
period of the award.
The following table sets forth the total stock-based
compensation expense included in the related financial statement
line items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,916
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
1,490
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
3,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,071
|
|
|
$
|
3,222
|
|
|
$
|
6,173
|
|
|
$
|
2,910
|
|
|
$
|
7,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimated the fair value of each option granted using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing method using the following
assumptions for the periods presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Weighted average stock price volatility
|
|
48%
|
|
52%
|
|
62%
|
|
60%
|
|
68%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
4.6 - 6.1
|
|
4.6
|
|
4.6
|
|
4.6
|
|
4.6
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.6% - 4.9%
|
|
2.8% - 4.5%
|
|
1.8% - 3.1%
|
|
2.18% - 3.11%
|
|
2.25% - 2.47%
|
42
As of each stock option grant date, we considered the fair value
of the underlying common stock, determined as described below,
in order to establish the options exercise price.
As there has been no public market for our common stock prior to
this offering, and therefore a lack of company-specific
historical and implied volatility data, we have determined the
share price volatility for options granted based on an analysis
of reported data for a peer group of companies that granted
options with substantially similar terms. The expected
volatility of options granted has been determined using an
average of the historical volatility measures of this peer group
of companies for a period equal to the expected life of the
option. We intend to continue to consistently apply this process
using the same or similar entities until a sufficient amount of
historical information regarding the volatility of our own share
price becomes available, or unless circumstances change such
that the identified entities are no longer similar to us. In
this latter case, more suitable entities whose share prices are
publicly available would be utilized in the calculation.
The expected life of options granted has been determined
utilizing the simplified method as prescribed by the
SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin, or SAB, No. 107,
Share-Based Payment, or SAB 107. The risk-free
interest rate is based on a daily treasury yield curve rate
whose term is consistent with the expected life of the stock
options. We have not paid and do not anticipate paying cash
dividends on our shares of common stock; therefore, the expected
dividend yield is assumed to be zero.
In addition, SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated
at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent
periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates,
whereas SFAS 123 permitted companies to record forfeitures
based on actual forfeitures. We apply an estimated forfeiture
rate based on our historical forfeiture experience.
Since the beginning of fiscal year 2007 through
December 31, 2009, we granted stock options with exercise
prices as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value per Share
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
for Financial
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Options
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Reporting Purposes at
|
|
SFAS 123R
|
Grant Dates
|
|
Granted
|
|
per Share
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
July 20, 2006
|
|
|
88,100
|
|
|
$
|
9.01
|
|
|
$
|
9.01
|
|
|
$
|
428,034
|
|
September 28, 2006
|
|
|
133,794
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
678,175
|
|
December 1, 2006
|
|
|
713,000
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
3,590,525
|
|
January 31, 2007(1)
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
831,617
|
|
January 31, 2007
|
|
|
81,550
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
391,412
|
|
March 23, 2007
|
|
|
35,100
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
176,908
|
|
May 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,161,400
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
5,226,881
|
|
September 27, 2007
|
|
|
116,700
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
560,720
|
|
January 30, 2008
|
|
|
729,200
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
3,330,840
|
|
April 25, 2008
|
|
|
469,500
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
2,365,294
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
|
1,780,600
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
9,554,343
|
|
October 2, 2008
|
|
|
277,900
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
1,385,081
|
|
January 28, 2009
|
|
|
331,800
|
|
|
|
9.01
|
|
|
|
9.01
|
|
|
|
1,686,738
|
|
April 29, 2009
|
|
|
184,800
|
|
|
|
9.01
|
|
|
|
9.01
|
|
|
|
957,467
|
|
August 7, 2009
|
|
|
1,875,050
|
|
|
|
9.01
|
|
|
|
13.93
|
|
|
|
17,716,410
|
|
August 7, 2009(1)
|
|
|
87,705
|
|
|
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
13.93
|
|
|
|
805,939
|
|
October 6, 2009
|
|
|
210,600
|
|
|
|
11.08
|
|
|
|
16.88
|
|
|
|
2,505,529
|
|
November 17, 2009
|
|
|
1,080,500
|
|
|
|
19.00
|
|
|
|
19.00
|
|
|
|
10,159,077
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Options granted with an exercise price per share equal to 110%
of the fair market value of one share of our common stock, as
determined by our board of directors on the date of grant. |
43
We have historically granted stock options at exercise prices
equal to or greater than the fair market value as determined by
our board of directors on the date of grant, with input from
management. Because our common stock is not publicly traded, our
board of directors exercises significant judgment in determining
the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant based on
a number of objective and subjective factors. Factors considered
by our board of directors included:
|
|
|
|
|
company performance, our growth rate and financial condition at
the approximate time of the option grant;
|
|
|
|
the value of companies that we consider peers based on a number
of factors including, but not limited to, similarity to us with
respect to industry, business model, stage of growth, financial
risk or other factors;
|
|
|
|
changes in the company and our prospects since the last time the
board approved option grants and made a determination of fair
value;
|
|
|
|
amounts recently paid by investors for our common stock and
convertible preferred stock in
arms-length
transactions with stockholders;
|
|
|
|
the rights, preferences and privileges of preferred stock
relative to those of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
future financial projections; and
|
|
|
|
valuations completed in conjunction with, and at the time of,
each option grant.
|
We prepared contemporaneous valuations at each of the grant
dates consistent with the method outlined in the AICPA Practice
Guide, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities
Issued as Compensation, for all option grant dates in fiscal
years 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended December 31,
2009. The methodology we used derived equity values utilizing a
probability-weighted expected return method, or PWERM, that
weighs various potential liquidity outcomes with each outcome
assigned a probability to arrive at the weighted equity value.
For each of the possible events, a range of future equity values
is estimated, based on the market, income or cost approaches and
over a range of possible event dates, all plus or minus a
standard deviation for value and timing. The timing of these
events is based on discussion with our management. For each
future equity value scenario, the rights and preferences of each
stockholder class are considered in order to determine the
appropriate allocation of value to common shares. The value of
each common share is then multiplied by a discount factor
derived from the calculated discount rate and the expected
timing of the event (plus or minus a standard deviation of
time). The value per common share is then multiplied by an
estimated probability for each of the possible events based on
discussion with our management. The calculated value per common
share under each scenario is then discounted for a lack of
marketability. A probability-weighted value per share of common
stock is then determined. Under the PWERM, the value of our
common stock is estimated based upon an analysis of values for
our common stock assuming the following various possible future
events for the company:
|
|
|
|
|
initial public offering;
|
|
|
|
strategic merger or sale;
|
|
|
|
dissolution/no value to common stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
remaining a private company.
|
When using the PWERM, a market-comparable approach, an income
approach and a cost approach were used to estimate our aggregate
enterprise value at each valuation date. The market-comparable
approach estimates the fair market value of a company by
applying market multiples of publicly-traded firms in the same
or similar lines of business to the results and projected
results of the company being valued. When choosing the
market-comparable companies to be used for the market-comparable
approach, we focused on companies operating within the online
marketing and lead generation space. The comparable companies
remained largely unchanged during the valuation process. The
income approach involves applying an appropriate risk-adjusted
discount rate to projected debt free cash flows, based on
forecasted revenue and
44
costs. The cost approach involves identifying a companys
significant tangible assets, estimating the individual current
market values of each and then totaling them to derive the value
of the business as a whole. We used the cost approach method
under an assumption of dissolution.
We also prepared financial forecasts for each valuation report
date used in the computation of the enterprise value for both
the market-comparable approach and the income approach. The
financial forecasts were based on assumed revenue growth rates
that took into account our past experience and contemporaneous
future expectations. The risks associated with achieving these
forecasts were assessed in selecting the appropriate cost of
capital, which ranged from 15% to 17%.
We have performed these valuations since December 2003.
As an additional indicator of fair value, we note in the
individual valuation discussions below pricing of all sales of
our common stock for transactions occurring during the quarter
of the respective grant dates. Over the past several years, a
number of investors have purchased, or attempted to purchase,
shares from employees, former employees and other stockholders.
In some instances, we have exercised our right of first refusal
with regard to such proposed purchases and, accordingly,
purchased the shares for the price proposed by the investors,
and in other instances, we have chosen not to exercise our right
of first refusal and have permitted the proposed buyers to
complete the transactions with the sellers on the terms
disclosed to us.
While these transactions were not consummated in a highly liquid
market, we do believe that the transactions provide an
additional indicator of fair value based on the volume and
number of buyers. These transaction prices have indicated, as
additional support to our valuation analyses, that we have not
historically determined fair market values below the indications
of value for transactions in our common stock.
Discussion
of specific valuation inputs from July 2008 through November
2009
July 25, 2008. On July 25, 2008, our
board of directors determined a fair value of our common stock
of $10.28 per share, based on the factors described above as
well as a contemporaneous valuation report dated July 17,
2008. The valuation used a risk-adjusted discount of 16%, a
non-marketability discount of 23.4% and an estimated time to an
initial public offering or a strategic merger or sale of greater
than 12 months. The expected outcomes were weighted 50%
toward an initial public offering, 30% towards a strategic
merger or sale, 18% towards remaining a private company and 2%
towards a liquidation scenario. This valuation indicated a fair
value of $9.42 per share for our common stock. We determined to
set the fair value per share of our common stock at $10.28 per
share as of July 25, 2008, above the $9.42 per share
valuation as of July 17, 2008, since these valuations by
their nature involve estimates and judgments and, in our
opinion, the relatively small difference did not justify
reducing the fair market value determination for our common
stock. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we
exercised our right of first refusal to repurchase
115,275 shares of common stock at an average price of
$8.47, with a low price of $8.00 and a high price of $8.60.
During this same period, we chose not to exercise our right of
first refusal for transactions totaling 30,000 shares of
common stock at an average price of $8.75, with a low price of
$8.50 and a high price of $9.00.
October 2, 2008. On October 2, 2008,
our board of directors determined a fair value of our common
stock of $10.28 per share, based on the factors described above
as well as a contemporaneous valuation report dated
September 24, 2008. The valuation used a risk-adjusted
discount of 16%, a non-marketability discount of 26.8%, an
estimated time to an initial public offering of greater than
12 months and an estimated time to a strategic merger or
sale of less than 12 months. The expected outcomes were
weighted 50% toward an initial public offering, 30% towards a
strategic merger or sale, 18% towards remaining a private
company and 2% towards a liquidation scenario. This valuation
indicated a fair value of $9.94 per share for our common stock.
We determined to set the fair value per share of our common
stock at $10.28 per share as of October 2, 2008, above the
$9.94 per share valuation as of September 24, 2008, since
these valuations by their nature involve estimates and judgments
and, in our opinion, the relatively small difference did not
justify reducing the fair market value determination for our
common stock. During the three months ended December 31,
2009, we exercised our right of first refusal to repurchase
8,000 shares of common stock at a price of $8.50. During
this
45
same period, we chose not to exercise our right of first refusal
for transactions totaling 57,000 shares of common stock at
a price of $8.50.
January 28, 2009. On January 28,
2008, our board of directors determined a fair value of our
common stock of $9.01 per share, based on the factors described
above as well as a contemporaneous valuation report dated
December 31, 2008. The valuation used a risk-adjusted
discount of 15%, a non-marketability discount of 25%, an
estimated time to an initial public offering of 12 months
and an estimated time to a strategic merger or sale of more than
12 months. The expected outcomes were weighted 50% toward
an initial public offering, 30% towards a strategic merger or
sale, 18% towards remaining a private company and 2% towards a
liquidation scenario. This valuation indicated a fair value of
$9.01 per share for our common stock. During the three months
ended March 30, 2009, we exercised our right of first
refusal to repurchase 40,000 shares of common stock at an
average price of $7.31, with a low price of $6.25 and a high
price of $8.00. During this same period, there were no
transactions in our stock in which we chose not to exercise our
right of first refusal.
April 29, 2009. On April 29, 2009,
our board of directors determined a fair value of our common
stock of $9.01 per share, based on the factors described above
as well as a contemporaneous valuation report dated
March 31, 2009. The valuation used a risk-adjusted discount
of 15%, a non-marketability discount of 20%, an estimated time
to an initial public offering of more than 12 months and an
estimated time to a strategic merger or sale of more than
12 months. The expected outcomes were weighted 50% toward
an initial public offering, 30% towards a strategic merger or
sale, 18% towards remaining a private company and 2% towards a
liquidation scenario. This valuation indicated a fair value of
$8.29 per share for our common stock. We determined to set the
fair value per share of our common stock at $9.01 per share as
of April 29, 2009, above the $8.29 per share valuation as
of March 31, 2009, since these valuations by their nature
involve estimates and judgments and, in our opinion, the
relatively small difference did not justify reducing the fair
market value determination for our common stock. During the
three months ended June 30, 2009, we did not exercise our
right of first refusal to repurchase any common stock. During
this same period, we chose not to exercise our right of first
refusal for transactions totaling 30,000 shares of common stock
at a price of $8.00.
August 7, 2009. On August 7, 2009,
our board of directors determined a fair value of our common
stock of $9.01 per share, based on the factors described above
as well as a contemporaneous valuation report dated
June 30, 2009. The valuation used a risk-adjusted discount
of 15%, a non-marketability discount of 20%, an estimated time
to an initial public offering of more than 12 months and an
estimated time to a strategic merger or sale of more than
12 months. The expected outcomes were weighted 50% toward
an initial public offering, 30% towards a strategic merger or
sale, 18% towards remaining a private company and 2% towards a
liquidation scenario. This valuation indicated a fair value of
$9.00 per share for our common stock. During the three months
ended September 30, 2009, we exercised our right of first
refusal to repurchase 71,895 shares of common stock at an
average price of $8.03, with a low price of $7.00 and a high
price of $8.80. During this same period, we chose not to
exercise our right of first refusal for transactions totaling
144,583 shares of common stock at an average price of
$8.09, with a low price of $8.00 and a high price of $8.50.
Prior to the issuance of our financial statements for the three
month period ended September 30, 2009 in connection with
the initial filing of our registration statement on
Form S-1,
we decided to revise our estimate of fair value of our common
stock as of August 7, 2009. In reassessing the estimate of
fair value of our common stock, we considered the preliminary
estimated valuation range communicated by our underwriters as
well as the results of our contemporaneous valuation performed
on November 17, 2009, immediately prior to the initial
filing of our registration statement on
Form S-1.
The revised fair value as of August 7, 2009 was derived
based on a linear increase of our valuation between
April 29, 2008 (date of our last fair value determination
prior to issuance of our audited financial statements) and
November 17, 2009 (date of our initial filing of our
registration statement on
Form S-1).
We also compared the results of the calculation described above
with an estimate of fair value as of August 7, 2009 based
on the estimated fair value at November 17, 2009 adjusted
for the increase of the NASDAQ composite index between these two
dates, and noted no material differences. As a result of
reassessing the fair value of our common stock, we expect to
record additional compensation expense, excluding the effect of
forfeitures, of $8.1 million, of which $0.4 million
was recorded in our financial statements for the three months
ended September 30, 2009.
46
October 6, 2009. On October 6, 2009,
our board of directors determined a fair value of our common
stock of $11.08 per share, based on the factors described above
as well as a contemporaneous valuation report dated
September 15, 2009. The valuation used a risk-adjusted
discount of 15%, a non-marketability discount of 15%, an
estimated time to an initial public offering of less than
9 months and an estimated time to a strategic merger or
sale of more than 12 months. The expected outcomes were
weighted 50% toward an initial public offering, 30% towards a
strategic merger or sale, 18% towards remaining a private
company and 2% towards a liquidation scenario. This valuation
indicated a fair value of $11.08 per share for our common stock.
Consistent with our August 7, 2009 grant, we reassessed the
fair value of our common stock as of October 6, 2009. Given
the relatively immaterial number of shares issued, we derived
the revised estimate of fair value of $16.88 as of
October 6, 2009 assuming a linear increase of our valuation
between April 29, 2009 and November 17, 2009. We
expect to record compensation expense associated with the
October 6, 2009 grants of $997,000 through the end of
fiscal year 2010.
Significant events occurring between the October 6, 2009
and November 17, 2009 grants. Subsequent to
the October 6, 2009 board of directors meeting, we
initiated a process to evaluate underwriters for a potential
initial public offering. On November 2, 2009, our board of
directors approved managements recommendation of an
underwriting group and its recommendation to attempt an initial
public offering on an accelerated time line. On November 5,
2009, management, the underwriters, Qatalyst Partners, our
independent registered public accounting firm and external legal
counsel for the company and the underwriters held an
organizational meeting to formally begin the initial
public offering process and the process of underwriter due
diligence.
November 17, 2009. On November 17,
2009, our board of directors determined a fair value of our
common stock of $19.00 per share, based on a contemporaneous
valuation report dated October 31, 2009 and the preliminary
estimated valuation range communicated by our underwriters. The
valuation used a risk-adjusted discount of 15%, a
non-marketability discount of 5%, an estimated time to an
initial public offering of less than 4 months and an
estimated time to a strategic merger or sale of more than
12 months. The expected outcomes were weighted 80% toward
an initial public offering, 10% towards a strategic merger or
sale and 10% towards remaining a private company. This valuation
indicated a fair value of $17.87 per share for our common stock.
We determined the fair value per share of our common stock to be
$19.00 as of November 17, 2009, which was higher than the
$17.87 per share value indicated by our valuation analysis as of
October 31, 2009, based upon preliminary indications of
potential pricing ranges for our initial public offering. We
expect to record compensation expense associated with the
November 17, 2009 grants of $3.4 million through the
end of fiscal year 2010.
Based on the initial public offering price of $15.00 per share,
the fair value of the options outstanding at December 31,
2009 was $108 million, of which $58 million related to
vested options and $50 million related to unvested options.
Recoverability
of Intangible Assets, Including Goodwill
Intangible assets consist primarily of content, domain names,
customer and publisher relationships, non-compete agreements,
and other intangible assets. Intangible assets acquired in a
business combination are measured at fair value at the date of
acquisition. We amortize all intangible assets on a straight
line basis over their expected lives. As of June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2009, we had $106.7 million and
$139.3 million of goodwill, respectively, and
$34.0 million and $49.2 million of other intangible
assets, respectively, with estimable useful lives on our
consolidated balance sheets.
We review our indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment
at least annually or as indicators of impairment exist based on
comparing the fair value of the asset to the carrying value of
the asset. Goodwill is currently our only indefinite-lived
intangible asset. We perform our annual goodwill impairment test
in the fourth quarter for each of our DMS and DSS reporting
units. Our goodwill impairment test requires the use of
fair-value techniques, which are inherently subjective.
We performed our goodwill impairment test on our DMS reporting
unit by comparing the fair value of the business enterprise as
adjusted for the value of the DSS reporting unit to its carrying
value. The business enterprise value as a whole calculated on
April 20, 2009 for our goodwill impairment test in the
fourth quarter of 2009 differs from the implied market
capitalization based on the fair value of an individual share of
our
47
common stock used for granting stock options as March 31,
2009, as described below under Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Critical Accounting Estimates
Stock-Based Compensation, because the business enterprise
value is the estimated value that would be received for the sale
of the company as a whole in an orderly transaction between
market participants, whereas the estimated value used to
determine the fair value of an individual share of common stock
was determined on the basis of a non-marketable minority share
of a non-public company. The calculation of the non-marketable
minority interest of an individual share takes into
consideration interest bearing debt, the fair value of stock
options issued, shares outstanding and a marketability discount
on common stock that is not freely tradable in a public market.
Fair value of our DSS reporting unit was estimated in April 2009
using the income approach. Under the income approach, we
calculated the fair value of our DSS reporting unit based on the
present value of estimated future cash flows.
The valuation of goodwill could be affected if actual results
differ substantially from our estimates. Circumstances that
could affect the valuation of goodwill include, among other
things, a significant change in our business climate and buying
habits of our subscriber base along with increased costs to
provide systems and technologies required to support our content
and search capabilities. Based on our analysis in the fourth
quarter of 2009, no impairment of goodwill was indicated. We
have determined that a 10% change in our cash flow assumptions
or a marginal change in our discount rate as of the date of our
most recent goodwill impairment test would not have changed the
outcome of the test.
We evaluate the recoverability of our long-lived assets in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-lived Assets, or SFAS 144.
SFAS 144 requires recognition of impairment of long-lived
assets in the event that the net book value of such assets
exceeds the future undiscounted net cash flows attributable to
such assets. In accordance with SFAS 144, we recognize
impairment, if any, in the period of identification to the
extent the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the fair value of
such asset. Based on our analysis, no impairment was recorded in
fiscal year 2009.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth our consolidated statement of
operations for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
167,370
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
192,030
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
260,527
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
122,913
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
155,515
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of revenue(1)
|
|
|
108,945
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
|
|
130,869
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
|
|
181,593
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
|
|
88,250
|
|
|
|
71.8
|
|
|
|
111,604
|
|
|
|
71.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
58,425
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
61,161
|
|
|
|
31.8
|
|
|
|
78,934
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
34,663
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
43,911
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
Operating expenses:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
14,094
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
14,051
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
14,887
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
7,480
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
9,209
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
12,409
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
16,154
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
8,423
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
7,615
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
13,371
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
13,172
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
6,907
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
9,644
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
24,404
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
21,330
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
34,721
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
11,853
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
17,443
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(3,544
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1,870
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1,629
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
25,438
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
21,743
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
31,183
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
9,920
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
16,116
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(9,828
|
)
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
(8,876
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
(13,909
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
(4,266
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
(7,193
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,610
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,867
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,274
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,654
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,923
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,916
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Product development
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
3,378
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Six
Months Ended December 31, 2008 and 2009
Net
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
122,913
|
|
|
$
|
155,515
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
88,250
|
|
|
|
111,604
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Net revenue increased $32.6 million, or 27%, from the six
months ended December 31, 2008 to the six months ended
December 31, 2009. Substantially all of this increase was
attributable to an increase in net revenue from our financial
services client vertical and, to a lesser extent, our education
client vertical. Financial services client vertical net revenue
increased from $33.1 million in the six months ended
December 31, 2008 to $63.5 million in the
corresponding 2009 period, an increase of $30.4 million, or
92%. The increase in financial services client vertical net
revenue was driven by lead and click volume increases at
relatively steady prices. Our education client vertical net
revenue increased from $73.4 million in the six months
ended December 31, 2008 to $76.8 million in the
corresponding 2009 period, an increase of $3.4 million, or
5%, due to lead volume increases. Our other client
verticals net revenue declined from $14.8 million in
the six months ended December 31, 2008 to
$14.1 million in the corresponding 2009 period, a decline
of $703,000, or 5%, due primarily to a decline in our home
services client vertical due to both a challenging economic
environment and lack of available consumer credit. The decline
in our other client verticals net revenue was partially
offset by increases in our healthcare and B2B client
verticals net revenue due to acquisitions of online
publishing businesses within each of our healthcare and B2B
client verticals.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost of revenue increased $23.4 million, or 26%, from the
six months ended December 31, 2008 to the six months ended
December 31, 2009. The increase in cost of revenue was
driven by a $19.2 million increase in media costs due to
lead and click volume increases. Gross margin, which is the
difference between net revenue and cost of revenue as a
percentage of net revenue, remained flat at 28.2% in both the
six months ended December 31, 2008 and the six months ended
December 31, 2009.
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008-2009%
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
$
|
7,480
|
|
|
$
|
9,209
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
8,423
|
|
|
|
7,615
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,907
|
|
|
|
9,644
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
22,810
|
|
|
$
|
26,468
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
Product
Development Expenses
Product development expenses increased $1.7 million, or
23%, from the six months ended December 31, 2008 to the six
months ended December 31, 2009. The increase is
attributable to increased performance bonuses and compensation
expense of $782,000 from the six months ended December 31,
2008 to the corresponding 2009 period, increased stock-based
compensation expense of $566,000 and an increase in professional
services fees of $239,000 associated with the development of our
technology platforms. The increase in performance bonuses and
compensation expense is due to salary increases in the six
months ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the
corresponding 2008 period.
Sales and
Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses declined $808,000, or 10%, from the
six months ended December 31, 2008 to the six months ended
December 31, 2009. The decline is due to a 23% decrease in
our sales and marketing headcount and related compensation
expense of $1.2 million, partially offset by increased
stock-based compensation expense of $444,000. The decline in
headcount and related compensation expense is driven by a
reduction in workforce in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased $2.7 million,
or 40%, from the six months ended December 31, 2008 to the
six months ended December 31, 2009. The increase is driven
by an increase in stock-based compensation expense of
$2.7 million due to the increase in fair value of our
common stock and the grant of fully-vested options to certain
members of our board of directors. Our legal expense declined
$698,000, or 43%, from the six months ended December 31,
2008 to the corresponding 2009 period due to the settlement of
an ongoing legal matter in the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2009. The decline in legal expense was entirely offset by a 6%
increase in general and administrative headcount and related
compensation expense of $296,000, increased direct business
acquisition costs of $256,000 and various smaller increases in
general and administrative expenses.
Interest
and Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008-2009%
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,870
|
)
|
|
|
(1,629
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,327
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net declined $606,000, or
31%, from the six months ended December 31, 2008, to the
six months ended December 31, 2009. Other income (expense),
net increased $525,000, or 219%, from the six months ended
December 31, 2008 to the corresponding 2009 period due to a
legal settlement payment received in the three months ended
December 31, 2009, as well as foreign exchange gains
recorded in connection with the weakening of the
U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar. The decline in
interest expense is attributable to a decline in average
interest rates on our credit facility and the decrease in
interest income is due to a decline in our invested cash
balances.
50
Provision
for Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
$
|
4,266
|
|
|
$
|
7,193
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
43.0
|
%
|
|
|
44.6
|
%
|
The increase in our effective tax rate from the six months ended
December 31, 2008 to the six months ended December 31,
2009 was driven by an increase in non-deductible stock-based
compensation expense and, to a lesser extent, due to the
reinstatement of research and development tax credits and the
corresponding benefit received in the six months ended
December 31, 2008.
Comparison
of Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and
2009
Net
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
2007-2008
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
% Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
167,370
|
|
|
$
|
192,030
|
|
|
$
|
260,527
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
108,945
|
|
|
|
130,869
|
|
|
|
181,593
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
Net revenue increased $68.5 million, or 36%, from fiscal
year 2008 to fiscal year 2009, attributable primarily to an
increase in our financial services and education client
verticals, offset in part by a decline in our DSS business.
Financial services client vertical net revenue increased from
$21.9 million in fiscal year 2008 to $79.7 million in
fiscal year 2009, an increase of $57.8 million, or 264%.
Revenue growth in our financial services client vertical was
driven by lead and click volume increases at relatively steady
prices and the full effect of the acquisition of SureHits in the
fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008. Our education client
vertical net revenue increased from $142.2 million in
fiscal year 2008 to $151.4 million in fiscal year 2009, an
increase of $9.1 million, or 6%, half due to lead volume
increases and half due to pricing increases. Our other client
verticals net revenue increased from $24.3 million in
fiscal year 2008 to $26.3 million in fiscal year 2009, an
increase of $2.0 million, or 8%, due primarily to the full
effect of the acquisition of the assets of Vendorseek L.L.C.,
within our B2B client vertical in the fourth quarter of fiscal
year 2008. The revenue increase in our other client verticals
was partially offset by declines in our home services client
vertical due to both a challenging economic environment and lack
of available consumer credit.
Net revenue increased $24.7 million, or 15%, from fiscal
year 2007 to fiscal year 2008, attributable primarily to
increases in our education, financial services and other client
verticals, partially offset by declines in our DSS business.
Education client vertical net revenue increased from
$131.0 million to $142.2 million, an increase of
$11.2 million, or 9%, due to lead volume increases at
relatively steady prices. Financial services client vertical net
revenue increased from $12.2 million to $21.9 million,
an increase of $9.7 million, or 80%. Revenue growth in our
financial services client vertical was driven by the acquisition
of SureHits in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008. Net
revenue from our other client verticals increased from
$16.6 million in fiscal year 2007 to $24.3 million in
fiscal year 2008, an increase of $7.7 million, or 46%, due
to a $6.0 million increase in our home services client
vertical primarily resulting from the acquisition of
ReliableRemodeler in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 and,
to a lesser extent, organic growth.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost of revenue increased $50.7 million, or 39%, from
fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009, driven by a $43.3 million
increase in media costs due to lead and click volume increases
and, to a lesser extent, increased amortization of
acquisition-related intangible assets of $4.2 million resulting
from acquisitions in fiscal years 2008 and 2009. Our gross
margin declined from 31.8% in fiscal year 2008 to 30.3% in
fiscal year 2009 due primarily to the acquisition of SureHits,
which is characterized by lower gross margins.
51
Cost of revenue increased $21.9 million, or 20%, from
fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008, driven by a
$14.0 million increase in media costs due to lead volume
increases and, to a lesser extent, increased personnel costs of
$2.7 million due to an 11% increase in average headcount
and related compensation expense increases, as well as increased
amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets resulting
from acquisitions in fiscal year 2008. Gross margin declined
from 34.9% in fiscal year 2007 to 31.8% in fiscal year 2008 due
to increases in both the above mentioned headcount and related
compensation expense (including stock-based compensation
expense), as well as increases in fixed costs, and increased
amortization of acquired intangible assets associated with
acquisitions during fiscal year 2008.
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007-2008
|
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
$
|
14,094
|
|
|
$
|
14,051
|
|
|
$
|
14,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
|
|
12,409
|
|
|
|
16,154
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
13,371
|
|
|
|
13,172
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
34,021
|
|
|
$
|
39,831
|
|
|
$
|
44,213
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
Development Expenses
Product development expenses increased $836,000, or 6%, from
fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009, due to increased
management performance bonuses and increased stock-based
compensation expense. The increased management performance
bonuses were paid in connection with our achievement of
specified financial metrics during fiscal year 2009 that were
not achieved in the corresponding prior year period, as well as
an increase in the number of individuals eligible for such
bonuses. The increase in product development expenses was
partially offset by a reduction in workforce in the third
quarter of fiscal year 2009. Product development expenses
remained flat from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008.
Sales and
Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses increased $3.7 million, or
30%, from fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009, due to increased
stock-based compensation expense of $1.2 million, increased
personnel costs of $888,000, increased consulting fees of
$340,000, increased advertising and marketing expenses
associated with marketing campaigns of $331,000 and increased
depreciation and amortization of $193,000. The increase in
personnel costs was due to an 18% increase in average headcount
and related compensation expenses driven by the acquisition of
ReliableRemodeler in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008.
Increased consulting, advertising and marketing expenses was due
to overall increases in sales and marketing activities
associated with the increased volume of business in fiscal year
2009 as compared to the prior year period. The increase was
partially offset by a reduction in workforce in the third
quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Sales and marketing expenses increased $3.9 million, or
46%, from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008, due to increased
personnel costs of $3.9 million driven by a 47% increase in
average headcount and a one-time payout of a management
retention bonus in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, and,
to a lesser extent, increased stock-based compensation expense.
The increase in personnel costs was driven by the acquisition of
ReliableRemodeler in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses remained relatively flat in
fiscal year 2009 compared to fiscal year 2008. The slight
decline consisted of a decrease in legal expenses of $987,000,
partially offset by an increase in stock-based compensation
expense of $741,000. The decline in legal expenses is
attributable to a decrease in expenses related to an ongoing
legal matter which was settled prior to the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2009. In connection with the settlement, we paid a
one-time, non-refundable fee of $850,000. We recognized an
52
intangible asset of $226,000 related to the estimated fair value
of the license and expensed the remaining $624,000 as a
settlement expense.
General and administrative expenses increased $1.9 million,
or 17%, from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008. The increase
was driven by increased legal fees of $973,000 associated with
the legal matter discussed above, increased personnel costs of
$1.2 million due to a 6% increase in average headcount and
a one-time payout of management retention bonuses in the second
quarter of fiscal year 2008.
Interest
and Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007-2008
|
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
1,905
|
|
|
$
|
1,482
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
|
(83
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(3,544
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
192
|
%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)%
|
|
|
(265
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
1,034
|
|
|
$
|
413
|
|
|
$
|
(3,538
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)%
|
|
|
(957
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net declined
$4.0 million from fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009 due
to increased interest expense, lowered interest income and
foreign currency losses. The increase in interest expense is due
to an increase in non-cash imputed interest on
acquisition-related notes payable and a draw down on our credit
facilities. Decreased interest income is due to a decline in our
invested cash balances. The decline in other income (expense),
net was due to foreign currency losses driven by weakening of
the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar.
Interest and other income (expense), net declined $621,000 from
fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008 due to increased non-cash
imputed interest expense associated with an increase in
acquisition-related notes payable and the draw down on our
credit facilities, reduced interest income due to lower average
investment balances and declining average interest rates. The
increase in other income (expense), net relates to a change in
the functional currency of one of our subsidiaries and the
resulting reclassification of an unrealized currency translation
gain from other comprehensive income to other income (expense),
net.
Provision
for Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
$
|
9,828
|
|
|
$
|
8,876
|
|
|
$
|
13,909
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
38.6
|
%
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
|
|
44.6
|
%
|
The increase in our effective tax rate from fiscal year 2008 to
fiscal year 2009 was impacted by increased state income tax
expense in connection with our acquisitions of businesses in
various jurisdictions within the U.S. in which we did not
previously have a presence and, to a lesser extent, increased
foreign income taxes and non-deductible stock-based compensation
expense. The increase in our effective tax rate was partially
offset by increased research and development tax credits
recorded in connection with the Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008, or the Act. On October 3,
2008, the Act, which contains the Tax Extenders and
Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008 was signed into
law. Under the Act, the research credit was retroactively
extended for amounts paid or incurred after December 31,
2007 and before January 1, 2010.
The increase in our effective tax rate from fiscal year 2007 to
fiscal year 2008 was due to increased non-deductible stock-based
compensation expense and a decline in federal research and
development tax credits in fiscal year 2008 due to the
expiration of research and development credit laws in
December 31, 2007.
53
Quarterly
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly
consolidated statements of operations data for fiscal year 2008,
fiscal year 2009 and the first half of fiscal year 2010. We have
prepared the statements of operations for each of these quarters
on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus and, in the
opinion of the management, each statement of operation includes
all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for the fair statement of the results of
operations for these periods. This information should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements
and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. These
quarterly operating results are not necessarily indicative of
our operating results for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
44,383
|
|
|
$
|
40,806
|
|
|
$
|
49,739
|
|
|
$
|
57,102
|
|
|
$
|
63,678
|
|
|
$
|
59,235
|
|
|
$
|
69,813
|
|
|
$
|
67,801
|
|
|
$
|
78,552
|
|
|
$
|
76,963
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
30,551
|
|
|
|
28,623
|
|
|
|
32,840
|
|
|
|
38,855
|
|
|
|
45,281
|
|
|
|
42,969
|
|
|
|
46,780
|
|
|
|
46,563
|
|
|
|
55,047
|
|
|
|
56,557
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
13,832
|
|
|
|
12,183
|
|
|
|
16,899
|
|
|
|
18,247
|
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
|
|
16,266
|
|
|
|
23,033
|
|
|
|
21,238
|
|
|
|
23,505
|
|
|
|
20,406
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
3,524
|
|
|
|
3,355
|
|
|
|
3,476
|
|
|
|
3,757
|
|
|
|
3,723
|
|
|
|
3,512
|
|
|
|
3,895
|
|
|
|
4,470
|
|
|
|
4,739
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
4,122
|
|
|
|
2,948
|
|
|
|
3,387
|
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
|
|
3,594
|
|
|
|
4,137
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
3,990
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,542
|
|
|
|
3,217
|
|
|
|
3,242
|
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
3,736
|
|
|
|
3,171
|
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
3,441
|
|
|
|
6,203
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
4,642
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
7,354
|
|
|
|
8,014
|
|
|
|
6,645
|
|
|
|
5,208
|
|
|
|
13,062
|
|
|
|
9,806
|
|
|
|
11,969
|
|
|
|
5,474
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
(1,107
|
)
|
|
|
(879
|
)
|
|
|
(795
|
)
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
5,011
|
|
|
|
1,676
|
|
|
|
7,468
|
|
|
|
7,588
|
|
|
|
6,023
|
|
|
|
3,897
|
|
|
|
12,211
|
|
|
|
9,052
|
|
|
|
11,350
|
|
|
|
4,766
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
|
(2,123
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(2,799
|
)
|
|
|
(3,204
|
)
|
|
|
(2,719
|
)
|
|
|
(1,547
|
)
|
|
|
(5,818
|
)
|
|
|
(3,825
|
)
|
|
|
(4,837
|
)
|
|
|
(2,356
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,888
|
|
|
$
|
926
|
|
|
$
|
4,669
|
|
|
$
|
4,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,304
|
|
|
$
|
2,350
|
|
|
$
|
6,393
|
|
|
$
|
5,227
|
|
|
$
|
6,513
|
|
|
$
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
8,420
|
|
|
$
|
4,424
|
|
|
$
|
10,335
|
|
|
$
|
13,100
|
|
|
$
|
12,157
|
|
|
$
|
10,956
|
|
|
$
|
18,571
|
|
|
$
|
15,188
|
|
|
$
|
18,150
|
|
|
$
|
14,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly
Revenue Trends
Our quarterly net revenue decreased $3.6 million, or 8%,
from $44.4 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 to $40.8 million for the three
months ended December 31, 2007. For these respective
periods, our education client vertical revenue decreased by
$1.9 million due to seasonality; our financial services
client vertical revenue decreased by $501,000; our other client
verticals revenue decreased by $1.2 million due to a
decrease in revenue from our home services client vertical; and
our DSS business revenue was flat.
Our quarterly net revenue increased $8.9 million, or 22%,
from $40.8 million for the three months ended
December 31, 2007 to $49.7 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008. For these respective periods,
our education client vertical revenue increased by
$4.4 million due to seasonality; our financial services
client vertical revenue increased by $1.1 million due to
organic growth; our other client verticals revenue increased by
$3.5 million due to growth in our home services client
vertical as a result of the acquisition of Reliable Remodeler
and organic growth; and our DSS business revenue was flat.
Our quarterly net revenue increased $7.4 million, or 15%,
from $49.7 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 to $57.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008. For these respective periods, our
education client vertical revenue decreased by $193,000; our
financial services client vertical revenue increased by
$6.4 million due to the acquisition of SureHits and organic
growth; our other client verticals revenue increased by
$1.2 million due to growth in our home services client
vertical as a result of the acquisition of ReliableRemodeler;
and our DSS business revenue was flat.
54
Our quarterly net revenue increased $6.6 million, or 12%,
from $57.1 million for the three months ended June 30,
2008 to $63.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. For these respective periods, our
education client vertical revenue increased by $2.2 million
due to organic growth; our financial services client vertical
revenue increased by $4.5 million due to organic growth;
our other client verticals revenue was flat and our DSS business
revenue decreased by $228,000.
Our quarterly net revenue decreased $4.4 million, or 7%,
from $63.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 to $59.2 million for the three
months ended December 31, 2008. For these respective
periods, our education client vertical revenue decreased by
$5.3 million due to seasonality; our financial services
client vertical revenue increased by $2.8 million due to
organic growth; our other client verticals revenue decreased by
$2.2 million due to a decline in our home services client
vertical as a result of difficult economic conditions; and our
DSS business revenues increase by $262,000.
Our quarterly net revenue increased $10.6 million, or 18%,
from $59.2 million for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 to $69.8 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009. For these respective periods,
our education client vertical revenue increased by
$4.5 million due to seasonality; our financial services
client vertical revenue increased by $6.6 million due to
organic growth; our other client verticals revenue decreased by
$482,000; and our DSS business revenue was flat.
Our quarterly net revenue decreased $2.0 million, or 3%,
from $69.8 million the three months ended March 31,
2009 to $67.8 million the three months ended June 30,
2009. For these respective periods, our education client
vertical revenue increased by $860,000; our financial services
client vertical revenue decreased by $2.6 million due to
decreased marketing spend by one of our clients; our other
client verticals revenue was flat and our DSS business revenue
decreased by $299,000.
Our quarterly net revenue increased $10.8 million, or 16%,
from $67.8 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009 to $78.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009. For these respective periods, our
education client vertical revenue increased by $938,000; our
financial services client vertical revenue increased by
$9.0 million due to organic growth; our other client
verticals revenue increased by $987,000; and our DSS business
revenue decreased by $194,000.
Our quarterly net revenue declined $1.6 million, or 2%,
from $78.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 to $77.0 million for the three
months ended December 31, 2009. For these respective
periods, our education client vertical revenue declined by
$3.9 million due to seasonality and a decline in the
purchase of leads by one of our largest clients; our financial
services client vertical revenue increased by $1.4 million
due to organic growth; our other client verticals revenue
increased by $475,000; and our DSS business revenue increased by
$396,000.
Adjusted
EBITDA
Our use of Adjusted EBITDA. We include
Adjusted EBITDA in this prospectus because (i) we seek to
manage our business to a consistent level of Adjusted EBITDA as
a percentage of net revenue, (ii) it is a key basis upon
which our management assesses our operating performance,
(iii) it is one of the primary metrics investors use in
evaluating Internet marketing companies, (iv) it is a
factor in the evaluation of the performance of our management in
determining compensation, and (v) it is an element of
certain maintenance covenants under our debt agreements. We
define Adjusted EBITDA as net income less interest and other
income plus interest and other expense, provision for taxes,
depreciation expense, amortization expense, stock-based
compensation expense and foreign-exchange (loss) gain.
Restructuring charges have not been expensed and have not been
adjusted for in our Adjusted EBITDA.
We use Adjusted EBITDA as a key performance measure because we
believe it facilitates operating performance comparisons from
period to period by excluding potential differences caused by
variations in capital structures (affecting interest expense),
tax positions (such as the impact on periods or companies of
changes in effective tax rates or fluctuations in permanent
differences or discrete quarterly items) and the impact of
depreciation and amortization expense on definite-lived
intangible assets. Because Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal
comparisons of our historical operating performance on a more
consistent basis,
55
we also use Adjusted EBITDA for business planning purposes, to
incentivize and compensate our management personnel and in
evaluating acquisition opportunities.
In addition, we believe Adjusted EBITDA and similar measures are
widely used by investors, securities analysts, ratings agencies
and other interested parties in our industry as a measure of
financial performance and debt-service capabilities. Our use of
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you
should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for
analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these
limitations are:
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures for
capital equipment or other contractual commitments;
|
|
|
|
although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the
assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced
in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital
expenditure requirements for such replacements;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash
requirements for, our working capital needs;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not consider the potentially dilutive
impact of issuing equity-based compensation to our management
team and employees;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest
expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest
or principal payments on our indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect certain tax payments that may
represent a reduction in cash available to us; and
|
|
|
|
other companies, including companies in our industry, may
calculate Adjusted EBITDA measures differently, which reduces
their usefulness as a comparative measure.
|
Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should not be
considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to
invest in the growth of our business. When evaluating our
performance, you should consider Adjusted EBITDA alongside other
financial performance measures, including various cash flow
metrics, net loss and our other GAAP results.
The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
to net income, the most comparable GAAP measure, for each of the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,888
|
|
|
$
|
926
|
|
|
$
|
4,669
|
|
|
$
|
4,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,304
|
|
|
$
|
2,350
|
|
|
$
|
6,393
|
|
|
$
|
5,227
|
|
|
$
|
6,513
|
|
|
$
|
2,410
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
|
2,719
|
|
|
|
1,547
|
|
|
|
5,818
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
4,837
|
|
|
|
2,356
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,577
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
4,149
|
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
|
|
4,237
|
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
3,592
|
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
|
|
4,651
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
2,229
|
|
|
|
4,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
8,420
|
|
|
$
|
4,424
|
|
|
$
|
10,335
|
|
|
$
|
13,100
|
|
|
$
|
12,157
|
|
|
$
|
10,957
|
|
|
$
|
18,571
|
|
|
$
|
15,188
|
|
|
$
|
18,150
|
|
|
$
|
14,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA quarterly trends. We seek to
manage our business to a consistent level of Adjusted EBITDA as
a percentage of net revenue. We do so on a fiscal year basis by
varying our operations to balance revenue growth and costs
throughout the fiscal year. We do not seek to manage our
business to a consistent level of Adjusted EBITDA on a quarterly
basis. For fiscal years 2003 to 2009, Adjusted EBITDA as a
percentage of revenue was 22%, 20%, 22%, 23%, 22%, 19% and 22%,
respectively.
For quarterly periods from September 30, 2007 to
December 31, 2009, Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of
revenue was 19%, 11%, 21%, 23%, 19%, 18%, 27%, 22%, 23% and 19%,
respectively. In general, Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of
revenue tends to be seasonally weaker in the quarters ending
September 30 and,
56
particularly, December 31 and stronger in quarters ending March
31 and June 30. For the three months ended
December 31, 2007, Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of
revenue was 11%. This was due to typical seasonal weakness and a
one-time management tenure bonus. For the three months ended
March 31, 2009, Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue
was 27%. This was due to a reduction in work force undertaken at
the beginning of that period based on concerns held by our
management team regarding the deteriorating economic climate.
The economic climate did not have a negative effect on us in a
fashion that impacted our revenue growth, and our reduced cost
basis resulting from our work force reduction, combined with our
revenue growth, resulted in an Adjusted EBITDA margin for the
period that exceeded our historical quarterly Adjusted EBITDA
margin performance. We manage our business to a desired Adjusted
EBITDA margin level on a fiscal year basis, not on a quarterly
basis, and investors should expect our Adjusted EBITDA margins
to vary from quarter to quarter.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our primary operating cash requirements include the payment of
media costs, personnel costs, costs of information technology
systems and office facilities.
Since our inception, we have financed our operations and
acquisitions primarily through cash flow from operations,
private placements of our convertible preferred stock and
borrowing under our bank credit facilities and seller notes.
Through December 31, 2009, we have generated approximately
$142.5 million in cash flows from operations and have
received a total of approximately $37.4 million from
private share placements and an additional $6.4 million
from the exercise of stock options to purchase shares of our
common stock. Our principal sources of liquidity as of
December 31, 2009, consisted of cash and cash equivalents
of $34.1 million and our revolving credit facility which
had $50.2 million available for borrowing as of such date.
Net
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $9.4 million
in the six months ended December 31, 2008,
$16.1 million in the six months ended December 31,
2009 and $25.2 million, $24.8 million and
$32.6 million in fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively. Our net cash provided by or used in operating
activities is primarily a result of our net income adjusted by
non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization,
stock-based compensation expense, provision for sales returns
and changes in working capital components, and is influenced by
the timing of cash collections from our clients and cash
payments for purchases of media and other expenses.
Net cash provided by operating activities in the six months
ended December 31, 2009, was the result of net income of
$8.9 million, non-cash depreciation, amortization and
stock-based compensation expense of $15.7 million and an
increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of
$2.7 million, partially offset by an increase in prepaid
expenses and other assets of $4.4 million and an increase
in accounts receivable of $4.1 million. The increase in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities is due to timing of
payments. The increase in prepaid expenses and other assets is
due to timing of payments. The increase in accounts receivable
is attributable to increased revenue, as well as timing of
receipts.
Net cash provided by operating activities in the six months
ended December 31, 2008 was driven by net income of
$5.7 million, non-cash depreciation, amortization and
stock-based compensation expense of $11.3 million and an
increase in our provision for sales returns of
$1.4 million. Net cash provided by operating activities was
partially offset by a decline in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities of $4.9 million and an increase in accounts
receivable of $4.0 million. The increase in our provision
for sales returns is due to a significant increase in net
revenue. The decline in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
is due to timing of payments. The increase in accounts
receivable is attributable to increased revenue and timing of
receipts.
Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2009 was due
to net income of $17.3 million, non-cash depreciation,
amortization and stock-based compensation expense of
$22.2 million, partially offset by an increase in accounts
receivable of $9.0 million and increased deferred tax
assets of $4.1 million. The increase in accounts receivable
is due to increased revenue of 36% associated with the growth of
our business, as well as due to timing of receipts. The increase
in deferred tax assets is due to temporary differences between
the financial statement carrying amount and the tax basis of
existing assets and liabilities.
57
Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2008 was due
to net income of $12.9 million, non-cash depreciation,
amortization and stock-based compensation expense of
$14.9 million and increased accounts payable and accrued
liabilities of $3.0 million, partially offset by an
increase in deferred tax assets of $3.8 million and excess
tax benefits from exercise of stock options of
$1.7 million. The increase in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities is due to timing of payments. The increase in
deferred tax assets is due to temporary differences between the
financial statement carrying amount and the tax basis of
existing assets and liabilities. The increase in excess tax
benefits is attributable to exercises of stock options resulting
in tax deductions in excess of recorded stock-based compensation
expense.
Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2007 was
largely due to net income of $15.6 million and non-cash
depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense
of $11.7 million.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Our investing activities include acquisitions of media websites
and businesses; purchases, sales and maturities of marketable
securities; capital expenditures; and capitalized internal
development costs. Net cash used in investing activities was
$13.0 million and $47.6 million in the six months
ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and was
$26.4 million, $49.2 million and $27.3 million in
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. Capital
expenditures and internal software development costs totaled
$1.5 million and $1.7 million in the six months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and
$3.5 million, $3.6 million and $2.4 million in
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Cash used in investing activities in the six months ended
December 31, 2009 was impacted by our acquisition of
Internet.com, Insure.com and Payler Corp. D/B/A HSH Associates
Financial Publishers, or HSH. We acquired the website business
of the Internet.com division of WebMediaBrands, Inc. for an
initial $16.0 million cash payment. We acquired the website
business of Insure.com from LifeQuotes, Inc., an Illinois-based
online insurance quote service and brokerage business, for an
initial $15.0 million cash payment. We acquired HSH, a New
Jersey-based online company providing comprehensive mortgage
rate information, for an initial $6.0 million cash payment.
Cash used in investing activities in the six months ended
December 31, 2009 was also impacted by purchases of the
operations of 19 other website publishing businesses for an
aggregate of approximately $7.7 million in cash payments.
Cash used in investing activities in the six months ended
December 31, 2008 was impacted by the acquisition of
U.S. Citizens for Fair Credit Card Terms, Inc, or
CardRatings, an Arkansas-based online marketing company, for an
initial cash payment of $10.4 million, as well as purchases
of the operations of 20 other website publishing businesses for
approximately $4.2 million in cash payments.
Cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2009 was
impacted by the acquisition of CardRatings for an initial cash
payment of $10.4 million, as well as purchases of the
operations of 33 other website publishing businesses for an
aggregate of approximately $14.6 million in cash payments.
Cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2008 was driven
by the acquisitions of SureHits, ReliableRemodeler and
Vendorseek amounting to total cash payments of
$54.7 million, as well as purchases of the operations of 20
website publishing businesses for an aggregate of approximately
$9.5 million in cash payments. Cash used in investing
activities in fiscal year 2008 was partially offset by proceeds
from sales and maturities of marketable securities, net of
purchases of marketable securities, of $17.5 million. Cash
used in investing activities in fiscal year 2007 was driven by
purchases of the operations of 32 website publishing businesses
for an aggregate of approximately $11.8 million in cash
payments, as well as purchases of marketable securities, net of
proceeds from sales and maturities or marketable securities, of
$11.0 million.
Net
Cash Provided by or Used in Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $2.0 million and
$40.5 million in the six months ended December 31,
2008 and 2009, respectively. Cash provided by financing
activities in the six months ended December 31, 2009 was
due to proceeds from a draw-down of our revolving credit
facility of $43.3 million, partially offset by
$4.3 million in principal payments on acquisition-related
notes payable and our term loan. Cash provided by financing
activities in the six months ended December 31, 2008 was
due to proceeds from a
58
draw-down of
our revolving credit facility of $8.6 million, partially
offset by $6.1 million in principal payments on
acquisition-related notes payable.
Cash used in financing activities was $5.0 million and
$2.8 million in fiscal years 2009 and 2007, respectively,
and cash provided by financing activities was $22.8 million
in fiscal year 2008. Cash used in financing activities in fiscal
year 2009 was due to principal payments on acquisition-related
notes payable and our term loan of $13.1 million and stock
repurchases of $1.3 million, partially offset by proceeds
from a draw down of our revolving credit facility of
$8.6 million. Cash provided by financing activities in
fiscal year 2008 was driven by proceeds from our term loan of
$29.0 million and proceeds from issuance of common stock as
a result of stock option exercises of $2.6 million,
partially offset by $5.6 million in stock repurchases and
principal payments on acquisition-related notes payable of
$4.9 million. Cash used in financing activities in fiscal
year 2007 was driven by principal payments on
acquisition-related notes payable of $3.9 million,
partially offset by proceeds from issuance of common stock as a
result of stock option exercises of $0.7 million.
Capital
Resources
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, funds generated
from our operations and available amounts under our credit
facilities, together with the net proceeds of this offering,
will be sufficient to meet our working capital and
non-acquisition related capital expenditure requirements for at
least the next 12 months. In order to expand our business
or acquire additional complementary businesses or technologies,
we may need to raise additional funds through equity or debt
financings. If required, additional financing may not be
available on terms that are favorable to us, if at all. If we
raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or
convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our
stockholders will be reduced and these securities might have
rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our
current stockholders. No assurance can be given that additional
financing will be available or that, if available, such
financing can be obtained on terms favorable to our stockholders
and us.
During the last three years, inflation and changing prices have
not had a material effect on our business and we do not expect
that inflation or changing prices will materially affect our
business in the foreseeable future.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
During the periods presented, we did not have any relationships
with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as
entities often referred to as structured finance or special
purpose entities, which would have been established for the
purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purpose.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at
June 30, 2009 and the effect such obligations are expected
to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less Than 1 Year
|
|
|
1 to 3 Years
|
|
|
3 to 5 Years
|
|
|
More Than 5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
$
|
34,757
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,250
|
|
|
$
|
20,507
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
25,069
|
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
|
|
12,005
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
61,194
|
|
|
$
|
14,318
|
|
|
$
|
23,519
|
|
|
$
|
23,357
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition of SureHits, we also may be
required to make certain earn-out payments in the aggregate
amount of $13.5 million, payable in increments in the
amount of $4.5 million annually on January 26 of 2010, 2011
and 2012, contingent upon the achievement of specified financial
targets.
59
In August 2006, we entered into a loan and security agreement
which makes available a $30 million revolving credit
facility from a financial institution. In January 2008, we
signed an amendment to this loan and security agreement,
expanding the revolving credit availability to $60 million.
In September 2008, we replaced our existing revolving credit
facility of $60 million with credit facilities totaling
$100 million and in November 2009, we extended that
capacity to $130 million. As of December 31, 2009, the
facilities consisted of a $30 million five-year term loan,
with principal amortization of 10%, 10%, 20%, 25% and 35%
annually, and a $100 million revolving credit facility.
Borrowings under the credit facilities are collateralized by our
assets and interest is payable quarterly at specified margins
above either LIBOR or the Prime Rate. As of December 31,
2009, the interest rate varied dependent upon the ratio of
funded debt to adjusted EBITDA and ranged from LIBOR
+ 1.875% to 2.625% or Prime + 0.75% to 1.25% for the
revolving credit facility and from LIBOR + 2.25% to 3.0% or
Prime + 0.75% to 1.25% for the term loan. Adjusted EBITDA, as
defined in our bank credit facility, is substantially similar to
our measure of Adjusted EBITDA set forth under Prospectus
Summary Summary Consolidated Financial Data.
As of December 31, 2009, $27.0 million was outstanding
under the term loan and $49.8 million was outstanding under
the revolving credit facility. Under this loan and revolving
credit facility agreement, we are required to maintain certain
minimum financial ratios computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Quick ratio: ratio of (a) the sum of unrestricted cash and
cash equivalents and trade receivables less than 90 days
from invoice date to (b) current liabilities and face
amount of any letters of credit less the current portion of
deferred revenue.
|
|
|
|
Fixed charge coverage: ratio of (a) trailing 12 months
of adjusted EBITDA to (b) the sum of capital expenditures,
net cash interest expense, cash taxes, cash dividends and
trailing 12 months payments of indebtedness. Payment of
unsecured indebtedness is excluded to the degree that sufficient
unused revolving credit facility exists such that the relevant
debt payment could have been made from the credit facility.
|
|
|
|
Funded debt to adjusted EBITDA: ratio of (a) the sum of all
obligations owing to lending institutions, the face amount of
any letters of credit, indebtedness owing in connection with
seller notes and indebtedness owing in connection with capital
lease obligations to (b) trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA.
|
We were in compliance with these minimum financial ratios as of
June 30, 2008 and 2009 and as of December 31, 2009.
In January 2010, we replaced our existing credit facility with a
credit facility with a total borrowing capacity of
$175.0 million. The new facility consists of a
$35.0 million four-year term loan, with principal
amortization of 10%, 15%, 35% and 40% annually, and a
$140.0 million four-year revolving credit facility.
Interest on borrowings under the new credit facility is payable
quarterly at specified margins above either LIBOR or the Prime
Rate. The interest rate varies dependent upon the ratio of
funded debt to adjusted EBITDA and ranges from LIBOR + 2.125% to
2.875% or Prime + 1.00% to 1.50% for the revolving credit
facility and from LIBOR + 2.50% to 3.25% or Prime + 1.00% to
1.50% for the term loan. We are not required to repay any
portion of this new facility from the proceeds of this offering;
however, we may choose to do so at a future date. The minimum
financial ratios have not changed under the new facility. The
new credit facility expires in January 2014.
The operating lease obligations reflected in the table above
primarily include our corporate office leases.
The notes payable reflected in the table above consist of
non-interest-bearing, unsecured promissory notes issued in
connection with acquisitions.
Guarantees
We have agreements whereby we indemnify our officers and
directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or
director is, or was serving, at our request in such capacity.
The term of the indemnification period is for the officer or
directors lifetime. The maximum potential amount of future
payments we could be
60
required to make under these indemnification agreements is
unlimited; however, we have a director and officer insurance
policy that limits our exposure and enables us to recover a
portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of our insurance
policy coverage, we believe the estimated fair value of these
indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, we have not
recorded any liabilities for these agreements.
In the ordinary course of our business, we enter into standard
indemnification provisions in our agreements with our clients.
Pursuant to these provisions, we indemnify our clients for
losses suffered or incurred in connection with certain
third-party claims that our product infringed any United States
patent, copyright or other intellectual property rights. With
respect to our DSS products, we also indemnify our clients for
losses incurred in connection with third-party claims that the
items and content we provide infringe upon the intellectual
property rights of any third party. In some cases we are also
obligated to either secure the rights to use, replace or modify
the items and content, and, in the event that we are unable to
achieve the foregoing, the client is entitled to terminate the
agreement and receive a refund of certain payments made to us.
Each of these agreements contain general limitations on our
liability.
The potential amount of future payments to defend lawsuits or
settle indemnified claims under these indemnification provisions
may be unlimited; however, we believe the estimated fair value
of these indemnity provisions is minimal, and accordingly, we
have not recorded any liabilities for these agreements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
FASB, issued a new accounting standard that changes the
accounting for business combinations, including the measurement
of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business
combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the
accounting for pre-acquisition gain and loss contingencies, the
recognition of capitalized in-process research and development,
the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost
accruals, the treatment of acquisition-related transaction costs
and the recognition of changes in the acquirers income tax
valuation allowance. The new standard applies prospectively to
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and to changes in
valuation allowances for deferred tax assets and acquired income
tax uncertainties arising from past business combinations. The
adoption of the new standard on July 1, 2009 did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure
of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued. In particular, the new standard
sets forth (1) the period after the balance sheet date
during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate
events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition
or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the
circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or
transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its
financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an
entity should make about events or transactions that occurred
after the balance sheet date. We applied the requirement of this
standard effective June 30, 2009 and included additional
disclosures in the notes to our consolidated financial
statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
provides for a codification of accounting standards to be the
authoritative source of generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC
under federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative
GAAP for SEC registrants. We adopted the provisions of the
authoritative accounting guidance for the interim reporting
period ended September 30, 2009. The adoption did not have
a material effect on our consolidated results of operations or
financial condition.
In October 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
changes the accounting for arrangements with multiple
deliverables. Specifically, the new standard requires an entity
to allocate arrangement consideration at the inception of an
arrangement to all of its deliverables based on their relative
selling prices. In addition, the new standard eliminates the use
of the residual method of allocation and requires the
relative-selling-price method in all circumstances in which an
entity recognizes revenue for an arrangement with multiple
deliverables. In October 2009, the FASB also issued a new
accounting standard that changes revenue recognition for
tangible products
61
containing software and hardware elements. Specifically, if
certain requirements are met, revenue arrangements that contain
tangible products with software elements that are essential to
the functionality of the products are scoped out of the existing
software revenue recognition accounting guidance and will be
accounted for under the multiple-element arrangements revenue
recognition guidance discussed above. Both standards will be
effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. Early
adoption is permitted. We do not anticipate the adoption of
these standards to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risk
To date, our international client agreements have been
denominated solely in U.S. dollars, and accordingly, we
have not been exposed to foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations related to client agreements, and do not currently
engage in foreign currency hedging transactions. However, as the
local accounts for our India and Canada operations are
maintained in the local currency of India and Canada, we are
subject to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations
associated with remeasurement to U.S. dollars. A
hypothetical change of 10% in foreign currency exchange rates
would not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
Interest
Rate Risk
We had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
totaling $34.1 million, $25.2 million and
$27.3 million at December 31, 2009, June 30, 2009
and June 30, 2008, respectively. These amounts were
invested primarily in money market funds, short-term deposits
and marketable securities with original maturities of less than
three months. The unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments are held for working capital purposes and
short-term acquisitions financing. We do not enter into
investments for trading or speculative purposes. We believe that
we do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair
value as a result of changes in interest rates due to the
short-term nature of our cash equivalents and short-term
investments. Declines in interest rates, however, would reduce
future investment income.
As of December 31, 2009, we had outstanding a credit
facility consisting of a term loan, with principal amortization
of 10%, 10%, 20%, 25% and 35% annually, and a $100 million
revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2009, we had
$27.0 million outstanding on our term loan and
$49.8 million outstanding on our revolving credit facility.
Interest on the credit facility is payable quarterly at
specified margins above either LIBOR or the Prime Rate. The
interest rate varies dependent upon the ratio of funded debt to
adjusted EBITDA and ranges from LIBOR + 1.875% to 2.625% or
Prime + 0.75% to 1.25% for the revolving credit facility and
from LIBOR + 2.25% to 3.0% or Prime + 0.75% to 1.25% for the
term loan. A hypothetical change of 1% in the interest rate on
our credit facility would lead to higher interest expense, but
we do not believe it would materially affect our overall
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In January 2010, we replaced our existing credit facility with a
credit facility with a total borrowing capacity of
$175.0 million. The new facility consists of a
$35.0 million four-year term loan, with principal
amortization of 10%, 15%, 35% and 40% annually, and a
$140.0 million four-year revolving credit facility.
Interest on borrowings under the new credit facility is payable
quarterly at specified margins above either LIBOR or the Prime
Rate. The interest rate varies dependent upon the ratio of
funded debt to adjusted EBITDA and ranges from LIBOR + 2.125% to
2.875% or Prime + 1.00% to 1.50% for the revolving credit
facility and from LIBOR + 2.50% to 3.25% or Prime + 1.00% to
1.50% for the term loan. The interest rates on the new credit
facility are higher than on the previous credit facility. Our
exposure to interest rate risk under the new credit facility
will depend on the extent to which we utilize such facility. If
our borrowings under the new facility are comparable to our
borrowings under the previous credit facility, we do not believe
our exposure to interest rate risk will be materially different.
62
BUSINESS
Our
Company
QuinStreet is a leader in vertical marketing and media on the
Internet. We have built a strong set of capabilities to engage
Internet visitors with targeted media and to connect our
marketing clients with their potential customers online. We
focus on serving clients in large, information-intensive
industry verticals where relevant, targeted media and offerings
help visitors make informed choices, find the products that
match their needs, and thus become qualified customer prospects
for our clients. Our current primary client verticals are the
education and financial services industries. We also have a
presence in the home services,
business-to-business,
or B2B, and healthcare industries.
We generate revenue by delivering measurable online marketing
results to our clients. These results are typically in the form
of qualified leads or clicks, the outcomes of customer prospects
submitting requests for information on, or to be contacted
regarding, client products, or their clicking on or through to
specific client offers. These qualified leads or clicks are
generated from our marketing activities on our websites or on
third-party websites with whom we have relationships. Clients
primarily pay us for leads that they can convert into customers,
typically in a call center or through other offline customer
acquisition processes, or for clicks from our websites that they
can convert into applications or customers on their websites. We
are predominantly paid on a negotiated or market-driven
per lead or per click basis. Media costs
to generate qualified leads or clicks are borne by us as a cost
of providing our services.
Founded in 1999, we have been a pioneer in the development and
application of measurable marketing on the Internet. Clients pay
us for the actual opt-in actions by prospects or customers that
result from our marketing activities on their behalf, versus
traditional impression-based advertising and marketing models in
which an advertiser pays for more general exposure to an
advertisement. We have been particularly focused on developing
and delivering measurable marketing results in the search engine
ecosystem, the entry point of the Internet for most
of the visitors we convert into qualified leads or clicks for
our clients. We own or partner with vertical content websites
that attract Internet visitors from organic search engine
rankings due to the quality and relevancy of their content to
search engine users. We also acquire targeted visitors for our
websites through the purchase of
pay-per-click,
or PPC, advertisements on search engines. We complement search
engine companies by building websites with content and offerings
that are relevant and responsive to their searchers, and by
increasing the value of the PPC search advertising they sell by
matching visitors with offerings and converting them into
customer prospects for our clients.
Market
Opportunity
Our clients are shifting more of their marketing budgets from
traditional media channels such as direct mail, television,
radio, and newspapers to the Internet because of increasing
usage of the Internet by their potential customers. We believe
that direct marketing is the most applicable and relevant
marketing segment to us because it is targeted and measurable.
According to the July 2009 research report, Consumer
Behavior Online: A 2009 Deep Dive, by Forrester Research,
Americans spend 33% of their time with media on the Internet,
but online direct marketing was forecasted to represent only 16%
of the $149 billion in total annual U.S. direct
marketing spending in 2009, as reported by the Direct Marketing
Association. The Internet is an effective direct marketing
medium due to its targeting and measurability characteristics.
If direct marketing budgets shift to the Internet in proportion
to Americans share of time spent with media on the
Internet from 16% to 33% of the $149 billion in
total spending that could represent an increased
market opportunity of $25 billion. In addition, as
traditional media categories such as television and radio shift
from analog to digital formats, they can become channels for the
targeted and measurable marketing techniques and capabilities we
have developed for the Internet, thus expanding our addressable
market opportunity. Further future market potential will also
come from international markets.
63
Change
in marketing strategy and approach
We believe that marketing approaches are changing as budgets
shift from offline, analog advertising media to digital
advertising media such as Internet marketing. These changing
approaches are fundamental, and require a shift to fundamentally
new competencies, including:
From
qualitative, impression-driven marketing to analytic,
data-driven marketing
We believe that the growth in Internet marketing is enabling a
more data-driven approach to advertising. The measurability of
online marketing allows marketers to collect a significant
amount of detailed data on the performance of their marketing
campaigns, including the effectiveness of ad format and
placement and user responses. This data can then be analyzed and
used to improve marketing campaign performance and
cost-effectiveness on substantially shorter cycle times than
with traditional offline media.
From
account management-based client relationships to results-based
client relationships
We believe that marketers are becoming increasingly focused on
strategies that deliver specific, measurable results. For
example, marketers are attempting to better understand how their
marketing spending produces measurable objectives such as
meeting their target marketing cost per new customer. As
marketers adopt more results-based approaches, the basis of
client relationships with their marketing services providers is
shifting from being more account management-based to being more
results-oriented.
From
marketing messages pushed on audiences to marketing messages
pulled by self-directed audiences
Traditional marketing messages such as television and radio
advertisements are broadcast to a broad audience. The Internet
is enabling more self-directed and targeted marketing. For
example, when Internet visitors click on PPC search
advertisements, they are expressing an interest in and
proactively engaging with information about a product or service
related to that advertisement. The growth of self-directed
marketing, primarily through online channels, allows marketers
to present more targeted and potentially more relevant marketing
messages to potential customers who have taken the first step in
the buying process, which can in turn increase the effectiveness
of marketers spending.
From
marketing spending focused on large media buys to marketing
spending optimized for fragmented media
We believe that media is becoming increasingly fragmented and
that marketing strategies are changing to adapt to this trend.
There are millions of Internet websites, tens of thousands of
which have significant numbers of visitors. While this
fragmentation can create challenges for marketers, it also
allows for improved audience segmentation and the delivery of
highly targeted marketing messages, but new technologies and
approaches are necessary to effectively manage marketing given
the increasing complexity resulting from more media
fragmentation.
Increasing
complexity of online marketing
Online marketing is a dynamic and increasingly complex
advertising medium. There are numerous online channels for
marketers to reach potential customers, including search
engines, Internet portals, vertical content websites, affiliate
networks, display and contextual ad networks, email, video
advertising, and social media. We refer to these and other
marketing channels as media. Each of these channels may involve
multiple ad formats and different pricing models, amplifying the
complexity of online marketing. We believe that this complexity
increases the demand for our vertical marketing and media
services due to our capabilities and to our experience managing
and optimizing online marketing programs across multiple
channels. Also marketers and agencies often lack our ability to
aggregate offerings from multiple clients in the same industry
vertical, an approach that allows us to cover a wide selection
of visitor segments and provide more potential matches to
Internet visitor needs. This approach can allow us to convert
more Internet visitors into qualified leads or clicks from
targeted media sources, giving us an advantage when buying or
monetizing that media.
64
Our
Business Model
We deliver cost-effective marketing results to our clients,
predictably and scalably, most typically in the form of a
qualified lead or click. These leads or clicks can then convert
into a customer or sale for the client at a rate that results in
an acceptable marketing cost to them. We get paid by clients
primarily when we deliver qualified leads or clicks as defined
in our agreements. Because we bear the costs of media, our
programs must deliver a value to our clients and a media yield,
or our ability to generate an acceptable margin on our media
costs, that provides a sound financial outcome for us. Our
general process is:
|
|
|
|
|
We own or access targeted media.
|
|
|
|
We run advertisements or other forms of marketing messages and
programs in that media to create visitor responses or clicks
through to client offerings.
|
|
|
|
We match these responses or clicks to client offerings or brands
that meet visitor interests or needs, converting visitors into
qualified leads or clicks.
|
|
|
|
We optimize client matches and media yield such that we achieve
desired results for clients and a sound financial outcome for us.
|
Media cost, or the cost to attract targeted Internet visitors,
is the largest cost input to producing the measurable marketing
results we deliver to clients. Balancing our clients cost
and conversion objectives, or the rate at which the leads or
clicks that we deliver to them convert into customers, with our
media costs and yield objectives, represents the primary
challenge in our business model. We have been able to
effectively balance these competing demands by focusing on our
media sources and capabilities, conversion optimization, and our
mix of offerings and client coverage. We also seek to mitigate
media cost risk by working with third-party website publishers
predominantly on a revenue-share basis; media purchased on a
non-revenue-share basis has represented a small minority of our
media costs and of the Internet visitors we convert into
qualified leads or clicks for clients.
Media
and Internet visitor mix
We are a client-driven organization. We seek to be one of the
largest providers of measurable marketing results on the
Internet in the client industry verticals we serve by meeting
the needs of clients for results, reliability and volume.
Meeting those client needs requires that we maintain a
diversified and flexible mix of Internet visitor sources due to
the dynamic nature of online media. Our media mix changes with
changes in Internet visitor usage patterns. We adapt to those
changes on an ongoing basis, and also proactively adjust our mix
of vertical media sources to respond to client or
vertical-specific circumstances and to achieve our financial
objectives. Our financial objectives are to achieve consistent,
sustainable financial performance, but can differ by client or
industry vertical, depending on factors such as our need to
invest in the development of media sources, marketing programs,
or client relationships. Generally, our Internet visitor sources
include:
|
|
|
|
|
websites owned and operated by us, with content and offerings
that are relevant to our clients target customers;
|
|
|
|
visitors acquired from PPC advertisements purchased on major
search engines and sent to our websites;
|
|
|
|
revenue sharing agreements with third-party websites with whom
we have a relationship and whose content is relevant to our
clients target customers;
|
|
|
|
email lists owned by third parties and warranted to us by their
owners to comply with the CAN-SPAM Act;
|
|
|
|
email lists owned by us, and generated on an
opt-in basis
from Internet visitors to our websites; and
|
|
|
|
display ads run through online advertising networks or directly
with major websites or portals.
|
65
Conversion
optimization
Once we acquire targeted Internet visitors from any of our
numerous online media sources, we seek to convert that media
into qualified leads or clicks at a rate that balances client
results with our media costs or yield objectives. We start by
defining the segments and interests of Internet visitors in our
verticals, and by providing them with the information and
product offerings on our websites and in our marketing programs
that best meet their needs. Achieving acceptable client results
and media yield then requires ongoing testing, measuring,
analysis, feedback, and adaptation of the key components of our
Internet marketing programs. These components include the
marketing or advertising messaging, content mix, visitor
navigation path, mix and coverage of client offerings presented,
and point-of-sale conversion messaging the content
that is presented to an Internet visitor immediately prior to
converting that individual into a lead or click for our clients.
This data complexity is managed by us with technology, data
reporting, marketing processes, and personnel. We believe that
our scale and ten-year track record give us an advantage, as
managing this complexity often implies a steep experience-based
learning curve.
Offerings
and client coverage
The Internet is a self-directed medium. Internet visitors choose
the websites they visit and their online navigation paths, and
always have the option of clicking away to a different website
or web page. Having offerings or clients that match the
interests or needs of website visitors is key to providing
results and adequate media yield. Our vertical focus allows us
to continuously revise and improve this matching process, to
better understand the various segments of visitors and client
offerings available to be matched, and to ensure that we enable
Internet visitors to find what they seek.
Our
Competitive Advantages
Vertical
focus and expertise
We focus our efforts on large, attractive market verticals, and
on building our depth of media and coverage of clients and
client offerings within them. We have been a pioneer in
developing vertical marketing and media on the Internet, and in
providing measureable marketing results to clients. We focus on
clients who are moving their marketing spending to measurable
online formats and on information-intensive verticals with large
underlying market opportunities and high product or customer
lifetime values. This focus allows us to utilize targeted media,
in-depth industry and client knowledge, and customer
segmentation and breadth of client offerings, or coverage, to
deliver results for our clients and greater media yield.
Measurable
marketing experience and expertise
We have substantial experience at designing and deploying
marketing programs that allow Internet visitors to find the
information or product offerings they seek, and that can deliver
economically attractive, measurable results to our clients,
cost-effectively for us. Such results require frequent testing
and balancing of numerous variables, including Internet visitor
sources, mix of content and of client and product offerings,
visitor navigation paths, prospect qualification, and
advertising creative design, among others. The complexity of
executing these marketing campaigns is challenging. Due to our
scale and ten-year track record, we have successfully executed
thousands of Internet marketing programs, and we have gained
significant experience managing and optimizing this complexity
to meet our clients volume, quality and cost objectives.
Targeted
media
Targeted media attracts Internet visitors who are relatively
narrowly focused demographically or in their interests. Targeted
media can deliver better measurable marketing results for our
clients, at lower media costs for us, due to higher rates of
conversion of Internet visitors into leads or clicks for
targeted offerings and, often, due to less competition from
display advertisers. We have significant experience at creating,
identifying, monetizing, and managing targeted media on the
Internet. Many of the targeted media sources for our marketing
programs are proprietary or more defensible because of our
direct ownership of websites in our verticals, our acquisition
of targeted Internet visitors directly from search engines to
our websites, and our exclusive or long-term relationships
66
with media properties or sources owned by others. Examples of
websites that we own and operate include WorldWideLearn.com,
ArmyStudyGuide.com and Chef2Chef.com in our education client
vertical; CardRatings.com, MoneyRates.com and Insure.com in our
financial services client vertical; AllAboutLawns.com and
OldHouseWeb.com in our home services client vertical; and
ElderCarelink.com in our healthcare client vertical.
Proprietary
technology
We have developed a core technology platform and a common set of
applications for managing and optimizing measurable marketing
programs across multiple verticals at scale. The primary
objectives and effects of our technologies are to achieve higher
media yield, deliver better results for our clients, and more
efficiently and effectively manage our scale and complexity. We
continuously strive to develop technologies that allow us to
better match Internet visitors in our verticals to the
information, clients or product offerings they seek at scale. In
so doing, our technologies can allow us to simultaneously
improve visitor satisfaction, increase our media yield, and
achieve higher rates of conversions of leads or clicks for our
clients a virtuous cycle of increased value for
Internet visitors and our clients and competitive advantage for
us. Some of the key applications in our technology platform are:
|
|
|
|
|
an ad server for tracking the placement and performance of
content, creative messaging, and offerings on our websites and
on those of publishers with whom we work;
|
|
|
|
database-driven applications for dynamically matching content,
offers or brands to Internet visitors expressed needs or
interests;
|
|
|
|
a platform for measuring and managing the performance of tens of
thousands of PPC search engine advertising campaigns;
|
|
|
|
dashboards or reporting tools for displaying operating and
financial metrics for thousands of ongoing marketing campaigns;
and,
|
|
|
|
a compliance tool capable of cataloging and filtering content
from the thousands of websites on which our marketing programs
appear to ensure adherence to client branding guidelines and to
regulatory requirements.
|
Approximately one-third of our employees are engineers, focused
on building, maintaining and operating our technology platform.
Client
relationships
We believe we are a reliable source of measurably effective
marketing results for our clients. We endeavor to work
collaboratively and in a data-driven way with clients to improve
our results for them. Our client retention rate is high. We
experienced no attrition among clients that individually
accounted for over $100,000 in monthly revenue to us for the
one-year period ended December 31, 2009. Those clients
represented 75% of our revenue over that time period. In
addition, most of our revenue growth comes from existing
clients; 66% of our
year-over-year
revenue growth in the quarter ended December 31, 2009 came
from incremental revenue from existing clients, defined as
clients we had worked with for at least one year. We believe our
high client retention and per client growth rates are due to:
|
|
|
|
|
our close, often direct, relationships with most of our large
clients;
|
|
|
|
our ability to deliver measurable and attractive return on
investment, or ROI, on clients marketing spending;
|
|
|
|
our ownership of, or exclusive access to large amounts of,
targeted media inventory and associated Internet visitors in the
industry verticals on which we focus; and,
|
|
|
|
our ability to consistently and reliably deliver large
quantities of qualified leads or clicks.
|
67
We believe that our high client retention rates, combined with
our depth and breadth of online media in our primary client
verticals, indicate that we are becoming an important marketing
channel partner for our clients to reach their prospective
customers.
Client-driven
online marketing approach
We focus on providing measurable Internet marketing and media
services to our clients in a way that protects and enhances
their brands and their relationships with prospective customers.
The Internet marketing programs we execute are designed to
adhere to strict client branding and regulatory guidelines, and
are designed to match our clients brands and offers with
expressed customer interest. We have contractual arrangements
with third-party website publishers to ensure that they follow
our clients brand guidelines, and we utilize our
proprietary technologies and trained personnel to help ensure
compliance. In addition, we believe that providing relevant,
helpful content and client offers that match an Internet
visitors self-selected interest in a product or service,
such as requesting information about an education program or
financial product, makes that visitor more likely to convert
into a customer for our clients.
We do not engage in online marketing practices such as spyware
or deceptive promotions that do not provide value to Internet
visitors and that can undermine our clients brands. A
small minority of our Internet visitors reach our websites or
client offerings through advertisements in emails. We employ
practices to ensure that we comply with the CAN-SPAM Act
governing unsolicited commercial email.
Acquisition
strategy and success
We have successfully acquired vertical marketing and media
companies on the Internet, including vertical website
businesses, marketing services companies, and technologies. We
believe we can integrate and generate value from acquisitions
due to our scale, breadth of capabilities, and common technology
platform.
|
|
|
|
|
Our ability to monetize Internet media, coupled with client
demand for our services, provides us with a particular advantage
in acquiring targeted online media properties in the verticals
on which we focus.
|
|
|
|
Our capabilities in online media can allow us to generate a
greater volume of leads or clicks, and therefore create more
value, than other owners of marketing services companies that
have aggregated client budgets or relationships.
|
|
|
|
We can often apply technologies across our business volume to
create more value than previous owners of the technology.
|
Scale
We are one of the largest Internet vertical marketing and media
companies in the world. Our scale allows us to better meet the
needs of large clients for reliability, volume and quality of
service. It allows us to invest more in technologies that
improve media yield, client results and our operating
efficiency. We are also able to invest more in other forms of
research and development, including determining and developing
new types of vertical media, new approaches to engaging website
visitors, and new segments of Internet visitors and client
budgets, all of which can lead to advantages in media costs,
effectiveness in delivering client results, and then to more
growth and greater scale.
Our
Strategy
Our goal is to be one of the largest and most successful
marketing and media companies on the Internet, and eventually in
other digitized media forms. We believe that we are in the early
stages of a very large and long-term business opportunity. Our
strategy for pursuing this opportunity includes the following
key components:
|
|
|
|
|
Focus on generating sustainable revenues by providing
measurable value to our clients.
|
|
|
|
Build QuinStreet and our industry sustainably by behaving
ethically in all we do and by providing quality content and
website experiences to Internet visitors.
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
Remain vertically focused, choosing to grow through depth,
expertise and coverage in our current industry verticals; enter
new verticals selectively over time, organically and through
acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
Build a world class organization, with
best-in-class
capabilities for delivering measurable marketing results to
clients and high yields or returns on media costs.
|
|
|
|
Develop and evolve the best technologies and platform for
managing vertical marketing and media on the Internet; focus on
technologies that enhance media yield, improve client results
and achieve scale efficiencies.
|
|
|
|
Build, buy and partner with vertical content websites that
provide the most relevant and highest quality visitor
experiences in the client and media verticals we serve.
|
|
|
|
Be a client-driven organization; develop a broad set of media
sources and capabilities to reliably meet client needs.
|
Our
Culture
Our values are the foundation of our successful business
culture. They represent the standards we strive to achieve and
the organization we continuously seek to become. These have been
our guiding principles since our founding in 1999. Our values
are:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Performance. We understand our business
objectives and apply a whatever it takes approach to
meeting them. We are driven to achieve. We are committed to our
own personal and professional development and to that of our
colleagues.
|
|
|
2.
|
High Standards. We hold each other and
ourselves to the highest standards of performance,
professionalism and personal behavior. We act with the highest
of ethical standards. We tolerate and forgive mistakes, but not
patterns.
|
|
|
3.
|
Teamwork. We deal with one another
openly, honestly and non-hierarchically in an atmosphere of
mutual trust and respect and in pursuit of common stretch goals.
We have an obligation to dissent in an effort to reach the best
answers. We smooth the way for effective, dynamic team
discussions by demonstrating care and concern for each
individual in all of our interactions. We support decisions,
once made.
|
|
|
4.
|
Customer Empathy. We strive every day
to better understand and anticipate the needs of our customers,
including our website visitors, clients and publishers. We
leverage our unique insights into higher customer loyalty and
competitive advantage.
|
|
|
5.
|
Prioritization. We always work on what
is most important to achieving Company objectives first. If we
do not know, we ask or discuss competing demands.
|
|
|
6.
|
Urgency. We know our goals and measure
our progress toward them daily.
|
|
|
7.
|
Progress. We are pioneers. We make
decisions based on facts and analysis, as well as intuition, but
we expect to make mistakes in the pursuit of rapid progress. We
learn from mistakes on short cycle times and iterate our way to
success.
|
|
|
8.
|
Innovation and Flexibility. We prize
creativity. We embrace new ideas and approaches as opportunities
to improve our performance or work environment. We resist pride
of authorship; it limits progress. We actively benchmark and
work to understand and employ best practices.
|
|
|
9.
|
Recognition. We are a meritocracy.
Advancement and recognition are earned through contribution and
performance. We celebrate each others victories and
efforts.
|
|
|
10.
|
Fun. We believe that work, done well,
can and should be fun. We strive to create an upbeat, supportive
environment and try not to take ourselves too seriously. We do
not tolerate negativism, pessimism or nay saying...we dont
have time.
|
69
Clients
In fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended
December 31, 2009, our top 20 clients accounted for 76%,
70%, 68% and 67% of net revenue, respectively. Our largest
client, DeVry Inc., accounted for 22%, 23%, 19% and 12% of net
revenue in these periods, respectively. Since our service was
first offered in 2001, we have developed a broad client base
with many multi-year relationships. We enter into Internet
marketing contracts with our clients, most of which are
cancelable with little or no prior notice. In addition, these
contracts do not contain penalty provisions for cancellation
before the end of the contract term.
Sales and
Marketing
We have an internal sales team that consists of employees
focused on signing new clients and account managers who maintain
and seek to increase our business with existing clients. Our
sales people and account managers are each focused on a
particular client business vertical so that they develop an
expertise in the marketing needs of our clients in that
particular vertical.
Our marketing programs include attendance at trade shows and
conferences and limited advertising.
Technology
and Infrastructure
We have developed a suite of technologies to manage, improve and
measure the results of the marketing programs we offer our
clients. We use a combination of proprietary and third-party
software as well as hardware from established technology
vendors. We use specialized software for client management,
building and managing websites, acquiring and managing media,
managing our third-party publishers, and the matching of
Internet visitors to our marketing clients. We have invested
significantly in these technologies and plan to continue to do
so to meet the demands of our clients and Internet visitors, to
increase the scalability of our operations, and enhance
management information systems and analytics in our operations.
Our development teams work closely with our marketing and
operating teams to develop applications and systems that can be
used across our business. For the fiscal years 2007, 2008 and
2009 and the six months ended December 31, 2009, we spent
$14.1 million, $14.1 million, $14.9 million and
$9.2 million, respectively, on product development.
Our primary data center is at a third-party co-location center
in San Francisco, California. All of the critical
components of the system are redundant and we have a backup data
center in Las Vegas, Nevada. We have implemented these backup
systems and redundancies to minimize the risk associated with
earthquakes, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure, and
other events beyond our control.
Intellectual
Property
We rely on a combination of trade secret, trademark, copyright
and patent laws in the United States and other jurisdictions
together with confidentiality agreements and technical measures
to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary rights. We
currently have one patent application pending in the United
States and no issued patents. We rely much more heavily on trade
secret protection than patent protection. To protect our trade
secrets, we control access to our proprietary systems and
technology and enter into confidentiality and invention
assignment agreements with our employees and consultants and
confidentiality agreements with other third parties. QuinStreet
is a registered trademark in the United States and other
jurisdictions. We also have registered and unregistered
trademarks for the names of many of our websites and we own the
domain registrations for our many website domains.
We cannot guarantee that our intellectual property rights will
provide competitive advantages to us; our ability to assert our
intellectual property rights against potential competitors or to
settle current or future disputes will not be limited by our
agreements with third parties; our intellectual property rights
will be enforced in jurisdictions where competition may be
intense or where legal protection may be weak; any of the trade
secrets, trademarks, copyrights, patents or other intellectual
property rights that we presently employ in our business will
not lapse or be invalidated, circumvented, challenged, or
abandoned; competitors will not
70
design around our protected systems and technology; or that we
will not lose the ability to assert our intellectual property
rights against others.
Our
Competitors
Our primary competition falls into two categories: advertising
and direct marketing services agencies and online marketing and
media companies. We compete for business on the basis of a
number of factors including return on marketing expenditures,
price, access to targeted media, ability to deliver large
volumes or precise types of customer prospects, and reliability.
Advertising
and direct marketing services agencies
Online and offline advertising and direct marketing services
agencies control the majority of the large client marketing
spending for which we primarily compete. So, while they are
sometimes our competitors, agencies are also often our clients.
We compete with agencies to attract marketing budget or spending
from offline forms to the Internet or, once designated to be
spent online, to be spent with us versus the agency or by the
agency with others. When spending online, agencies spend with
QuinStreet and with portals, other websites and ad networks.
Online
marketing and media companies
We compete with other Internet marketing and media companies, in
many forms, for online marketing budgets. Most of these
competitors compete with us in one vertical. Examples include
BankRate in the financial services vertical and Monster
Worldwide in the education vertical. Some of our competition
also comes from agencies or clients spending directly with
larger websites or portals, including Google, Yahoo!, MSN, and
AOL.
Government
Regulation
Advertising and promotional information presented to visitors on
our websites and our other marketing activities are subject to
federal and state consumer protection laws that regulate unfair
and deceptive practices. There are a variety of state and
federal restrictions on the marketing activities conducted by
telephone, the mail or by email, or over the internet, including
the Telemarketing Sales Rule, state telemarketing laws, federal
and state privacy laws, the CAN-SPAM Act, and the Federal Trade
Commission Act and its accompanying regulations and guidelines.
In addition, some of our clients operate in regulated
industries, particularly in our financial services, education
and medical verticals. For example, the U.S. Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act, or RESPA, regulates the payments that
may be made to mortgage brokers. While we do not engage in the
activities of a traditional mortgage broker, we are licensed as
a mortgage broker in 25 states for our online marketing
activities. In our education vertical, our clients are subject
to the U.S. Higher Education Act, which, among other
things, prohibits incentive compensation in recruiting students.
The U.S. Department of Education is currently engaged in a
negotiated rulemaking process in which it has suggested
repealing all existing safe harbors regarding incentive
compensation in recruiting, including the Internet safe harbor.
While we believe that our fee per lead model does not constitute
incentive compensation for purposes of the Higher Education Act,
the results of the negotiated rulemaking could impact how we are
paid for leads by clients in our education vertical and could
also impact our education clients and their marketing practices.
In our medical vertical, our medical device and supplies clients
are subject to state and federal anti-kickback statutes that
prohibit payment for referrals. While we believe our matching of
prospective customers with our clients and the manner in which
we are paid for these activities complies with these and other
applicable regulations, these rules and regulations in many
cases were not developed with online marketing in mind and their
applicability is not always clear. The rules and regulations are
complex and may be subject to different interpretations by
courts or other governmental authorities. We might
unintentionally violate such laws, such laws may be modified and
new laws may be enacted in the future. Any such developments (or
developments stemming from enactment or modification of other
laws) or the failure to anticipate accurately the application or
interpretation of these laws could create liability to us,
result in adverse publicity and negatively affect our businesses.
71
Employees
As of December 31, 2009, we had 568 employees, which
included 162 employees in product development and
engineering, 80 in sales and marketing, 52 in general and
administration and 274 in operations. None of our employees is
represented by a labor union.
Facilities
Our principal executive offices are located in a leased facility
in Foster City, California, consisting of approximately
53,877 square feet of office space under a lease that
expires in October 2010. This facility accommodates our
principal engineering, sales, marketing, operations and finance
and administrative activities. As of December 31, 2009, we
also lease buildings in Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut,
Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina,
Oklahoma, Oregon, India and the United Kingdom. These facilities
total approximately 54,587 square feet. We believe that our
current facilities are sufficient for our current needs. We
intend to add new facilities and expand our existing facilities
as we add employees and expand our markets, and we believe that
suitable additional or substitute space will be available as
needed to accommodate any such expansion of our operations.
Legal
Proceedings
From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings
and claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. We
are not currently a party to any material litigation.
72
MANAGEMENT
Officers
and Directors
Our officers and directors and their respective ages and
positions as of December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Douglas Valenti
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|
Bronwyn Syiek
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Kenneth Hahn
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Tom Cheli
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
Scott Mackley
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
Nina Bhanap
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Chief Technology Officer
|
Daniel Caul
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
General Counsel
|
Christopher Mancini
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
Patrick Quigley
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
Timothy Stevens
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
William Bradley(1)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Director
|
John G. McDonald(2)
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
Director
|
Gregory Sands(1)(2)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Director
|
James Simons(1)(3)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Director
|
Glenn Solomon(3)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Director
|
Dana Stalder(2)(3)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Member of the nominating and corporate governance committee. |
|
(2) |
|
Member of the compensation committee. |
|
(3) |
|
Member of the audit committee. |
Officers
Douglas Valenti has served as our Chief Executive Officer
since July 1999 and as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
since March 2004. Prior to QuinStreet, Mr. Valenti served
as a partner at Rosewood Capital, a venture capital firm, for
five years; at McKinsey & Company as a strategy
consultant and engagement manager for three years; at
Procter & Gamble in various management roles for three
years; and for the U.S. Navy as a nuclear submarine officer
for five years. He holds a Bachelors degree in Industrial
Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, where he
graduated with highest honors and was named the Georgia Tech
Outstanding Senior in 1982, and an M.B.A. from the Stanford
Graduate School of Business, where he was an Arjay Miller
Scholar.
Bronwyn Syiek has served as our President and Chief
Operating Officer since February 2007, as our Chief Operating
Officer from April 2004 to February 2007, as Senior Vice
President from September 2000 to April 2004, as Vice President
from her start date in March 2000 to September 2000 and as a
consultant to us from July 1999 to March 2000. Prior to joining
us, Ms. Syiek served as Director of Business Development
and member of the Executive Committee at De La Rue Plc, a
banknote printing and security product company, for three years.
She previously served as a strategy consultant and engagement
manager at McKinsey & Company for four years and held
various investment management and banking positions with Lloyds
Bank and Charterhouse Bank. She holds an M.A. in Natural
Sciences from Cambridge University in the United Kingdom.
Kenneth Hahn has served as our Chief Financial Officer
since September 2006. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hahn served
as Chief Financial Officer of Borland Software Corporation, a
public software company,
73
from September 2002 to July 2006. Previously, Mr. Hahn
served in various roles, including Chief Financial Officer, of
Extensity, Inc., a public software company, for five years; as a
strategy consultant at the Boston Consulting Group for three
years; and as an audit manager at Price Waterhouse, a public
accounting firm, for five years. He holds a B.A. in Business
from California State University Fullerton, summa cum laude, and
an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business, where
he was an Arjay Miller Scholar. Mr. Hahn is also a
Certified Public Accountant (inactive), licensed in the state of
California.
Tom Cheli has served as our Executive Vice President
since February 2007, as Senior Vice President from December 2004
to February 2007, as Vice President of Sales from January 2001
to December 2004 and as Director of Sales from February 2000 to
January 2001. Prior to joining us, Mr. Cheli served as
Director of Inside Sales and Sales Operations at Collagen
Aesthetics Corporation, an aesthetic biomedical device company,
and as Regional Sales Manager at Akorn Ophthalmics, Inc., a
specialty pharmaceutical company. He holds a B.A. in Sports
Medicine from the University of the Pacific.
Scott Mackley has served as our Executive Vice President
since February 2007, as Senior Vice President from December 2004
to February 2007, as Vice President from June 2003 to December
2004, as Senior Director from February 2002 to June 2003, as
Director from October 2000 to February 2002 and as Senior
Manager, Network Management from May 2000 to October 2000. Prior
to joining us, Mr. Mackley served at Salomon Brothers and
Salomon Smith Barney, in various roles in their Equity Trading
unit and Investment Banking and Equity Capital Markets divisions
over four years. He holds a B.A. in Economics from Washington
and Lee University.
Nina Bhanap has served as our Chief Technology Officer
since July 2009, as our Senior Vice President of Engineering
from November 2006 to July 2009, as Vice President of Product
Development from January 2004 to November 2006, as Senior
Director from January 2003 to January 2004 and as Director of
Product Management from October 2001 to January 2003. Prior to
joining us, Ms. Bhanap served as Head of Fixed Income Sales
Technology for Europe at Morgan Stanley for five years and as a
senior associate at Booz Allen Hamilton for one year. She holds
a B.S. in Computer Science with Honors from Imperial College,
University of London, and an M.B.A. from the London Business
School.
Daniel Caul has served as our General Counsel since
January 2008. Prior to joining us, Mr. Caul served as
General Counsel for the Search and Media division of
IAC/InterActiveCorp, an Internet search and advertising company,
from September 2006 to January 2008, and prior to the
acquisition by IAC/InterActiveCorp, he was Assistant General
Counsel of Ask Jeeves, Inc. from February 2003 to September
2006. Previously, Mr. Caul was an attorney with Howard,
Rice, Nemerovsky, Canady, Falk and Rabkin, a corporate law firm,
for four years and served as a U.S. District Court clerk. He
holds a B.A. in Political Science from Vanderbilt University,
summa cum laude, and a J.D. from the Harvard Law School, magna
cum laude. Mr. Caul was also a Fulbright Scholar.
Christopher Mancini has served as our Senior Vice
President since October 2007, as Vice President from January
2006 to October 2007, as Senior Director from July 2004 to
January 2006, as Director from December 2003 to July 2004 and as
Senior Sales Manager from November 2000 to February 2003. Prior
to joining us, Mr. Mancini served in various sales and
operational roles at Eli Lilly & Company, NeuroScience
Division, for six years. He holds a B.S. from the Duquesne
University School of Pharmacy.
Patrick Quigley has served as our Senior Vice President
since November 2007. Prior to rejoining us, Mr. Quigley
served at BEA Systems, a software company, from June 2002 to
November 2007, as Vice President of Strategic Sales and
Operations from February 2007 to November 2007, Vice President
of Sales Operations from February 2005 to February 2007, and
Director of Solutions Marketing from October 2003 to February of
2005. Mr. Quigley initially joined QuinStreet in July 1999
and served in various positions for two years; previously, he
served as a consultant at McKinsey & Company for two
years. He holds a B.S. in Engineering, summa cum laude, from
Duke University. He holds an M.B.A. with Honors from The Wharton
School at the University of Pennsylvania.
Timothy Stevens has served as our Senior Vice President
since October 2008. Prior to joining us, Mr. Stevens served
as President and CEO of Doppelganger, Inc., an online social
entertainment studio, from
74
January 2007 to October 2008. Prior to Doppelganger,
Mr. Stevens served as General Counsel for Borland Software
Corporation, a software company, from October 2003 to June 2006.
Previously, he served in various executive management roles,
including most recently as Senior Vice President of Corporate
Development, at Inktomi Corporation, an Internet infrastructure
company, during his six year tenure. Previously,
Mr. Stevens was an attorney with Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich & Rosati, a corporate law firm, for six
years. He holds a B.S. in both Finance and Management from the
University of Oregon, summa cum laude, and a J.D. from the
University of California at Davis, Order of the Coif.
Board
of Directors
William Bradley has served as a member of our board of
directors since August 2004. Former Senator Bradley is a
Managing Director of Allen & Company LLC, an
investment bank, which he joined in November 2000. From
April 2001 to June 2004, Former Senator Bradley also served as
chief outside advisor to the nonprofit practice of
McKinsey & Company. Former Senator Bradley served in
the U.S. Senate from 1979 to 1997, representing the state
of New Jersey, and previously was a professional basketball
player with the New York Knicks from 1967 to 1977. Former
Senator Bradley also serves on the boards of directors of
Seagate Technology, Starbucks Coffee Company and Willis Group
Holdings. Former Senator Bradley received a B.A. in American
History from Princeton University and an M.A. in American
History from Oxford University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar.
John G. (Jack) McDonald has served as a member of our
board of directors since September 2004. Professor McDonald is
the Stanford Investors Professor in the Stanford Graduate School
of Business, where he has been a faculty member since 1968,
specializing in investment management, entrepreneurial finance,
principal investing, venture capital, and private equity
investing. Professor McDonald also serves on the boards of
directors of Varian, Inc., Plum Creek Timber Company, Scholastic
Corporation, iStar Financial, Inc., and nine mutual funds
managed by Capital Research and Management Company. He holds a
B.A. in Engineering, an M.B.A., and a Ph.D. in Business and
Finance from Stanford University. He is a retired officer in the
U.S. Army and was a Fulbright Scholar.
Gregory Sands has served as a member of our board of
directors since July 1999. Since September 1998, Mr. Sands
has been a Managing Director at Sutter Hill Ventures, a venture
capital firm. Previously, Mr. Sands held various
operational roles at Netscape Communications Corporation and was
a management consultant with Mercer Management Consulting.
Mr. Sands also serves on the boards of several
privately-held companies. He holds a B.A. in Government from
Harvard College and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School
of Business.
James Simons has served as a member of our board of
directors since July 1999. Mr. Simons is a Managing
Director of Split Rock Partners, a venture capital firm, which
he founded in June 2004. Prior to founding Split Rock Partners,
Mr. Simons served as General Partner of St. Paul Venture
Capital, a venture capital firm, from November 1996 to June
2004. Previously, Mr. Simons was a partner at Marquette
Venture Partners and held banking positions at Trammell Crow
Company and First Boston Corporation. Mr. Simons also
serves on the boards of several privately-held companies. He
holds a B.A. in Economics and History from Stanford University
and an M.S. in Management from the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School
of Management, Northwestern University.
Glenn Solomon has served as a member of our board of
directors since May 2007. Since March 2006, Mr. Solomon has
been a Managing Director of GGV Capital (formerly Granite Global
Ventures), a venture capital firm. Prior to joining GGV Capital,
Mr. Solomon served as a General Partner at Partech
International, a venture capital firm, from September 1997.
Previously, Mr. Solomon served in various financial roles
at Goldman Sachs and at SPO Partners. Mr. Solomon also
serves on the board of a privately-held company. He earned a
B.A. in Public Policy from Stanford University, where he
graduated with Distinction, and an M.B.A. from the Stanford
Graduate School of Business, where he was an Arjay Miller
Scholar.
Dana Stalder has served as a member of our board of
directors since May 2003. Since August 2008, Mr. Stalder
has been a General Partner of Matrix Partners, a venture capital
firm. Prior to joining Matrix Partners, Mr. Stalder served
in various executive roles, including Senior Vice President at
eBay, Inc., an online
75
marketplace company, from December 2001 to August 2008.
Previously, he was the Chief Financial Officer and Vice
President of Business Development of Respond.com, Vice President
of Finance and Operations at Netscape Communication Corporation
and an associate and manager at Ernst & Young LLP.
Mr. Stalder also serves on the boards of several
privately-held companies. He holds a B.A. in Commerce from
Santa Clara University.
Board
Composition
Independent
Directors
Upon the completion of this offering, our board of directors
will consist of seven members. In November 2009, our board of
directors undertook a review of the independence of each
director and considered whether any director has a material
relationship with us that could compromise his ability to
exercise independent judgment in carrying out his
responsibilities. As a result of this review, our board of
directors determined that all of our directors, other than
Mr. Valenti, qualify as independent directors
in accordance with the listing requirements and rules and
regulations of The NASDAQ Global Market, constituting a majority
of independent directors of our board of directors.
Mr. Valenti is not considered independent because he is an
employee of QuinStreet.
Classified
Board
Immediately after this offering, our board of directors will be
divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At
each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors
whose terms then expire will be elected to serve from the time
of election and qualification until the third annual meeting
following election. Our directors will be divided among the
three classes as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Class I directors will be Messrs. Simons and Stalder,
and their terms will expire at the annual general meeting of
stockholders to be held in 2011;
|
|
|
|
Class II directors will be Professor McDonald and
Mr. Sands, and their terms will expire at the annual
general meeting of stockholders to be held in 2012; and
|
|
|
|
Class III directors will be Former Senator Bradley and
Messrs. Solomon and Valenti, and their terms will expire at
the annual general meeting of stockholders to be held in 2013.
|
The authorized number of directors may be changed only by
resolution of the board of directors. This classification of the
board of directors into three classes with staggered three-year
terms may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in
our control or management.
Board
Committees
Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a
compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance
committee. Our board of directors may establish other committees
to facilitate the management of our business. The composition
and functions of each committee are described below.
Audit
Committee
Our audit committee currently consists of Messrs. Simons,
Solomon and Stalder. Messrs. Solomon and Stalder each
satisfy the independence requirements under the NASDAQ listing
standards and
Rule 10A-3(b)(1)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. We
anticipate that, following the completion of this offering,
Mr. Simons will resign from our audit committee and
Professor McDonald will replace Mr. Simons on the
committee. The chair of our audit committee is Mr. Stalder,
whom our board of directors has determined is an audit
committee financial expert within the meaning of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, regulations. Each
member of our audit committee can read and understand
fundamental financial statements in accordance with audit
committee requirements. In arriving at this determination, the
76
board has examined each audit committee members scope of
experience and the nature of their employment in the corporate
finance sector. The functions of this committee include:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing and pre-approving the engagement of our independent
registered public accounting firm to perform audit services and
any permissible non-audit services;
|
|
|
|
evaluating the performance of our independent registered public
accounting firm and deciding whether to retain their services;
|
|
|
|
reviewing our annual and quarterly financial statements and
reports and discussing the statements and reports with our
independent registered public accounting firm and management,
including a review of disclosures under Management
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations;
|
|
|
|
providing oversight with respect to related party transactions;
|
|
|
|
reviewing, with our independent registered public accounting
firm and management, significant issues that may arise regarding
accounting principles and financial statement presentation, as
well as matters concerning the scope, adequacy and effectiveness
of our financial controls;
|
|
|
|
reviewing reports from management and auditors regarding our
procedures to monitor and ensure compliance with our legal and
regulatory responsibilities, our code of business conduct and
ethics and our compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements; and
|
|
|
|
establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment
of complaints received by us regarding financial controls,
accounting or auditing matters.
|
Compensation
Committee
Our compensation committee consists of Professor McDonald and
Messrs. Sands and Stalder, each of whom our board of
directors has determined to be independent under the NASDAQ
listing standards, to be a non-employee director as
defined in
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act and to be an outside
director as that term is defined in Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or
Section 162(m). The chair of our compensation committee is
Professor McDonald. The functions of this committee include:
|
|
|
|
|
determining the compensation and other terms of employment of
our chief executive officer and our other executive officers and
reviewing and approving corporate performance goals and
objectives relevant to such compensation;
|
|
|
|
reviewing and approving the compensation of our directors;
|
|
|
|
evaluating and recommending to our board of directors the equity
incentive plans, compensation plans and similar programs
advisable for us, as well as modification or termination of
existing plans and programs;
|
|
|
|
establishing policies with respect to equity compensation
arrangements; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing with management our disclosures under the caption
Compensation Discussion and Analysis and
recommending to the full board its inclusion in our periodic
reports to be filed with the SEC.
|
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee
Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of
Former Senator Bradley and Messrs. Sands and Simons, each
of whom our board of directors has determined is independent
under the
77
NASDAQ listing standards. The chair of our nominating and
corporate governance committee is Former Senator Bradley. The
functions of this committee include:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing periodically director performance on our board of
directors and its committees and performance of management, and
recommending to our board of directors and management areas of
improvement;
|
|
|
|
interviewing, evaluating, nominating and recommending
individuals for membership on our board of directors;
|
|
|
|
evaluating nominations by stockholders of candidates for
election to our board of directors and establishing policies and
procedures for such nominations;
|
|
|
|
reviewing with our chief executive officer plans for succession
to the offices of chief executive officer or any other executive
officer, as it sees fit; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing and recommending to our board of directors changes
with respect to corporate governance practices and policies.
|
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics
Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to
all of our employees, officers (including our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar
functions), agents and representatives, including directors and
consultants. Upon the effectiveness of the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part, the full text
of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will be posted on our
website at www.quinstreet.com. We intend to disclose future
amendments to certain provisions of our Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics, or waivers of such provisions, applicable to any
principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller, or persons
performing similar functions or our directors on our website
identified above. The inclusion of our website address in this
prospectus does not include or incorporate by reference the
information on our website into this prospectus.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of the compensation committee is currently
or has been at any time one of our officers or employees. None
of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during
the last completed fiscal year, as a member of the board of
directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one
or more executive officers serving as a member of our board of
directors or compensation committee.
Summary
of Non-Employee Director Compensation
In January 2010, our compensation committee adopted a
compensation policy that, effective upon the closing of this
offering, will be applicable to all of our non-employee
directors. This compensation policy provides that each such
non-employee director will receive the following compensation
for board services:
|
|
|
|
|
$25,000 per year for service as a board member;
|
|
|
|
$15,000 per year for service as a chairperson of the audit
committee, compensation committee or nominating and corporate
governance committee;
|
|
|
|
$2,000 for each in-person board meeting and $1,000 for each
telephonic board meeting;
|
|
|
|
$1,500 for each in-person committee meeting; and
|
|
|
|
$1,000 for each telephonic committee meeting.
|
In addition, the non-employee director compensation plan
provides that non-employee directors will be granted an option
to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock under the
Non-Employee Directors Stock Award Plan in connection with
their initial election or appointment to our board of directors.
These initial
78
grants will vest monthly over a period of four years. The plan
also provides that non-employee directors will receive an annual
grant of an option to purchase 20,000 shares of our common
stock. These grants will vest monthly over a period of one year.
We have reimbursed and will continue to reimburse our
non-employee directors for their travel, lodging and other
reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of our board
of directors and committees of the board of directors.
Additionally, certain of our non-employee directors were granted
an option to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock
under our stock option plans in connection with their initial
election to serve on our board of directors. We have also
awarded certain existing non-employee directors an option to
purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock annually.
The following table sets forth information regarding
compensation earned by or paid to certain of our non-employee
directors during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
Messrs. Sands, Simons and Solomon were not compensated for
their services as directors in the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
Awards
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
Cash
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)
|
|
William Bradley
|
|
$
|
58,000
|
|
|
$
|
129,528
|
|
|
$
|
187,528
|
|
John G. McDonald
|
|
$
|
58,000
|
|
|
$
|
129,528
|
|
|
$
|
187,528
|
|
Dana Stalder
|
|
$
|
58,000
|
|
|
$
|
129,528
|
|
|
$
|
187,528
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount reflects the total compensation expense for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2009 calculated in accordance with
stock-based compensation expense guidance. The valuation
assumptions used in determining such amounts are described in
Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included
in this prospectus. |
79
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
This section discusses the policies and decisions with respect
to the compensation of our executive officers who are named in
the Fiscal Year 2009 Summary Compensation Table and
the most important factors relevant to an analysis of these
policies and decisions. These named executive
officers for fiscal year 2009 are:
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas Valenti, Chief Executive Officer, or CEO;
|
|
|
|
Bronwyn Syiek, President and Chief Operating Officer;
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Hahn, Chief Financial Officer, or CFO;
|
|
|
|
Tom Cheli, Executive Vice President; and
|
|
|
|
Scott Mackley, Executive Vice President.
|
Overview
of Program Objectives
We recognize that our success is in large part dependent on our
ability to attract and retain talented employees. We endeavor to
create and maintain compensation programs based on performance,
teamwork and rapid progress and to align the interests of our
executives and stockholders. The principles and objectives of
our compensation and benefits programs for our employees
generally, and for our executive officers specifically, are to:
|
|
|
|
|
attract, motivate and retain highly-talented individuals who are
incented to achieve our strategic goals;
|
|
|
|
closely align compensation with our business and financial
objectives and the long-term interests of our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
motivate and reward individuals whose skills and performance
promote our continued success; and
|
|
|
|
offer total compensation that is competitive and fair.
|
The compensation of our executives consists of the following
principal components:
|
|
|
|
|
base salary;
|
|
|
|
performance-based cash bonuses;
|
|
|
|
equity incentive awards;
|
|
|
|
employee benefits and perquisites; and
|
|
|
|
change in control benefits.
|
Each component has a role in meeting the above objectives. While
we offer competitive base salaries and performance-based cash
bonuses, we believe that equity incentive awards are a critical
compensation component for Internet and other emerging
companies. We believe that stock options and other stock-based
compensation provide long-term incentives that align the
interests of employees and executives alike with the long-term
interests of stockholders.
We strive to achieve an appropriate mix between cash
compensation and equity incentive awards to meet our objectives.
We do not apply any formal or informal policies or guidelines
for allocating compensation between current and long-term
compensation, between cash and equity compensation or among
different forms of equity compensation. As a result, the
allocation between cash and equity varies between executive
officers and does not control compensation decisions. The mix of
compensation components is designed to reward short-term results
and motivate long-term performance through a combination of cash
and awards. We believe the most important indicator of whether
our compensation objectives are being met is our ability to
motivate
80
our executive officers to deliver superior performance and
retain them to continue their careers with us on a
cost-effective basis.
The compensation levels of the executive officers reflect to a
significant degree the varying roles and responsibilities of
such executives, as well as the length of time those executives
have been with us.
Our compensation committee determines the appropriate level for
overall executive officer compensation and the separate
components based on (i) a review of publicly available
compensation data at a limited number of publicly-traded
companies in the Internet marketing and media sector,
(ii) compensation survey data for Internet companies with
comparable revenues, (iii) our understanding of the market
based on the experience of our executives and members of our
compensation committee and (iv) internal equity, length of
service, skill level and other factors we may deem appropriate.
Our compensation-setting process and each of the principal
components of our executive compensation program is discussed in
more detail below.
Compensation-Setting
Process
Historically, the compensation of our executive officers was
largely determined on an individual basis, as the result of
arms-length negotiations between the company and an
individual upon joining us and has been based on a variety of
factors including, in addition to the factors described above,
our financial condition and available resources, our need for
that particular position to be filled, our CEOs and the
compensation committees evaluation of the competitive
market based on the experience of the members of our
compensation committee with other companies, the length of
service of an individual and the compensation levels of our
other executive officers, each as of the time of the applicable
compensation decision. In subsequent years, our CEO, and, with
respect to our CEO, our compensation committee, reviewed the
performance of each executive officer, on an annual basis, and
based on this review and the factors described above, set the
executive compensation package for him or her for the coming
year. This review has generally occurred near the end of each of
our fiscal years.
Role
of Compensation Committee and CEO
The compensation committee of our board of directors is
responsible for the executive compensation programs for our
executive officers and reports to the full board of directors on
its discussions, decisions and other actions. Our CEO makes
recommendations to the compensation committee, attends committee
meetings (except for sessions discussing his compensation) and
has been and will continue to be heavily involved in the
determination of compensation for our executive officers.
Typically, our CEO makes recommendations to the compensation
committee regarding short- and long-term compensation for our
executives based on company results, an individual
executives contribution toward these results, performance
toward goal achievement, a review of market data as described
below and input from our Employee Benefits and Compliance
department. Our CEO does not make a recommendation as to his
short- and long-term compensation.
The compensation committee then reviews the CEOs
recommendations and other data and approves each executive
officers total compensation, as well as each individual
compensation component. The compensation committees
decisions regarding executive compensation are based on the
compensation committees assessment of the performance of
our company and each individual executive, a review of market
data as described below and other factors, such as prevailing
industry trends.
Competitive
Positioning
We believe it is important when making compensation-related
decisions to be informed as to current practices of similarly
situated companies. Our CEO, with assistance from our CFO, has
historically selected a group of companies that provide Internet
media and marketing services that are broadly similar to our
company, or peer group, as a reference point for market practice
with respect to executive base salary and bonuses in formulating
his recommendation and to assist the compensation committee in
its consideration of
81
executive compensation. The companies included in this reference
group for fiscal year 2009 were TechTarget, Bankrate, Internet
Brands, TheStreet.com, ValueClick and Marchex.
In addition, in fiscal year 2009 the CEO and the compensation
committee reviewed summary cash compensation data from
Salary.com for positions comparable to those of the executive
officers at Internet companies with revenues between
$200,000,000 and $500,000,000 in the San Francisco Bay Area
because such companies are in our industry, in our geographic
location and have comparable revenues.
While the compensation committee does not believe that
compensation peer group benchmarking is appropriate as a
stand-alone tool for setting compensation due to the unique
aspects of our business, the compensation committee finds that
evaluating this information is an important part of its
decision-making process and exercises its discretion in
determining the nature and extent of its use.
Compensation
Advisors
In November 2009, we engaged Compensia, a national consulting
firm providing executive compensation advisory services, as a
compensation consultant to help evaluate our compensation
philosophy and provide guidance in administering our executive
compensation program in the future. We expect that Compensia
will assist our compensation committee in developing a revised
peer group to reference for compensation purposes, though it has
not yet done so. Our compensation committee plans to direct
Compensia to provide market data on a peer group of companies in
the Internet marketing and media sector and other sectors, as
appropriate, on an annual basis, and management and the
compensation committee intends to review this information and
other information obtained by the members of our compensation
committee in light of the compensation we offer to help ensure
that our compensation program is competitive and fair. The
compensation committee will conduct an annual review process of
all compensation components to ensure consistency with
compensation philosophy and as part of its responsibilities in
administering our executive compensation program.
The compensation committee is authorized to retain the services
of third-party executive compensation specialists from time to
time, as the committee sees fit, in connection with the
establishment of cash and equity compensation and related
policies.
Compensation
Components
Base
Salaries
In general, base salaries for our executive officers are
initially established through arms-length negotiation at
the time of hire, taking into account such executives
qualifications, experience and prior salary and prevailing
market compensation for similar roles in comparable companies.
The initial base salaries of our executive officers have then
been reviewed annually by our compensation committee, with
significant input from our CEO, to determine whether any
adjustment is warranted. Base salaries are also reviewed in the
case of promotions or other significant changes in
responsibility.
In considering a base salary adjustment, the compensation
committee considers the companys overall performance, the
scope of an executives sustained performance, individual
contribution, responsibilities and prior experience. The
compensation committee may also take into account the executive
officers current salary, equity ownership and the amounts
paid to an executive officers peers inside our company. In
the past, we have also drawn upon the experience of members of
our compensation committee with other companies and a review of
the competitive market.
In May 2008, the compensation committee reviewed the base
salaries of our executives, including our named executive
officers, for fiscal year 2009. Consistent with its prior
practice, the committee reviewed salary data for a reference
group of publicly-traded vertical Internet marketing and media
companies. The reference group consisted of TechTarget,
Bankrate, Internet Brands, TheStreet.com, ValueClick, CNET and
Marchex. In addition, the compensation committee reviewed
summary cash compensation data from Salary.com for positions
comparable to those of the executive officers at Internet
companies with revenues between $200,000,000 and $500,000,000 in
the San Francisco Bay Area. The committee determined, based
upon our CEOs recommendation, that although the analysis
supported an average increase of eight percent in
82
base salaries that base salaries for our named executive
officers be increased by five percent (with the exception of Mr.
Hahn, whose base salary increased by 4.8%) in an effort to shift
more cash compensation to bonus, and that base salaries for our
other executive officers be increased by five percent, on
average.
In May 2009, the compensation committee reviewed the base
salaries of our executive officers, including our named
executive officers, for fiscal year 2010. Consistent with its
prior practice, the committee reviewed salary data for a
reference group of publicly-traded vertical Internet marketing
and media companies. The reference group consisted of
TechTarget, eHealth, Bankrate, Omniture, WebMD, ValueClick and
comScore. In addition, the compensation committee reviewed
summary cash compensation data from Salary.com for positions
comparable to those of the executive officers at Internet
companies with revenues between $200,000,000 and $500,000,000 in
the San Francisco Bay Area. The committee determined, based
upon our CEOs recommendation, that although the analysis
supported an average increase of eight percent in base salaries
that base salaries for our named executive officers be increased
by five percent in a continued effort to shift a larger
percentage of cash compensation to bonus, and that base salaries
for our other executive officers be increased by five percent,
on average.
The actual base salaries paid to our named executive officers in
fiscal year 2009 are set forth in the Fiscal Year 2009
Summary Compensation Table.
Performance-Based
Cash Bonuses
Annual performance-based cash bonuses are intended to motivate
our executives, including our named executive officers, to
achieve short-term goals while making rapid progress towards our
longer-term objectives. These bonuses are designed to reward
both company and individual performance. In July 2008, the
compensation committee approved our 2009 Bonus Plan, including
target bonus opportunities, performance criteria and target
goals. The compensation committee determined the actual bonus
awards for fiscal year 2009 performance in July 2009.
Each executive officers target bonus opportunity under the
2009 Bonus Plan was expressed as a percentage of his or her base
salary, with individual target award opportunities ranging from
29% to 67% of base salary. The revenue targets for payout under
the 2009 Bonus Plan were 21% higher than fiscal year 2008 and
were set at an amount the compensation committee reasonably
believed to be attainable. An actual bonus award could be less
than or greater than the target bonus opportunity, depending on
an individual executive officers actual performance, as
determined through performance reviews and approved by the
compensation committee.
To determine actual bonus awards under the 2009 Bonus Plan, the
compensation committee first reviewed overall company financial
results for fiscal year 2009 and our CEOs recommendations
for bonuses based on both company and individual performance. In
the case of the CEOs bonus award, the compensation
committee evaluated CEO performance and determined his bonus.
Payout of the bonuses was dependent on achievement against our
plan for revenue growth and Adjusted EBITDA, which we define as
net income less interest income plus interest expense, provision
for taxes, depreciation expense, amortization expense,
stock-based compensation expense and foreign-exchange (loss)
gain, and, where applicable, the individual executives
achievement against that plan for revenue growth and Adjusted
EBITDA and against strategic objectives. Those strategic
objectives were (i) revenue growth, (ii) Adjusted
EBIDTA margin, (iii) the assessed sustainability of the
revenue growth, and (iv) developing future growth potential
and diversification of our revenue streams. Our named executive
officers were paid the following amounts pursuant to the 2009
Bonus Plan: Mr. Valenti, $248,340; Ms. Syiek, $181,840; Mr.
Cheli, $131,040; Mr. Mackley, $187,200; and Mr. Hahn, $113,000.
In addition to the 2009 Bonus Plan, in July 2008 the
compensation committee also approved the 2009 Incremental Bonus
Plan for our executive officers, including our named executive
officers. According to the 2009 Incremental Bonus Plan, the
target is a dollar amount based on 20% Adjusted EBITDA based on
our revenue projections. The 2009 Incremental Bonus Plan paid
out to the senior management team 15% of any Adjusted EBITDA in
excess of our target, which represented 20% Adjusted EBITDA
margin for the year based on projections reviewed by our board
of directors in July 2008. The 2009 Incremental Bonus Plan
allocated the following amounts to executive officers based on
their role and tenure at the company: Mr.
83
Valenti: 2.25%; Ms. Syiek: 2.25%; Mr. Cheli: 1.75%; Mr. Mackley:
1.75%; and Mr. Hahn: 1.00%. As we exceeded our Adjusted EBITDA
margin target, the compensation committee approved the payout of
incremental bonuses for fiscal year 2009 consistent with these
criteria. The total bonus payout under the 2009 Incremental
Bonus Plan was $888,740. Our named executive officers were paid
the following amounts pursuant to the 2009 Incremental Bonus
Plan: Mr. Valenti, $137,903; Ms. Syiek, $137,903;
Mr. Cheli, $107,258; Mr. Mackley, $107,258; and
Mr. Hahn, $61,290.
The actual cash bonuses paid to our named executive officers in
fiscal year 2009 are set forth in the Fiscal Year 2009
Summary Compensation Table.
In July 2009, the compensation committee approved the 2010 Bonus
Plan. Under the plan, each executive officers target bonus
for 2010 is expressed as a percentage of his or her base salary,
with individual target award opportunities ranging from 32% to
72% of base salary. Payout of regular bonuses for 2010 will be
dependent on achievement against our plan for revenue growth and
Adjusted EBITDA and, where applicable, the individual
executives achievement against that plan for revenue
growth and Adjusted EBITDA and against strategic objectives.
Those strategic objectives are (i) revenue growth,
(ii) Adjusted EBIDTA margin, (iii) the assessed
sustainability of the revenue growth, and (iv) developing
future growth potential and diversification of our revenue
streams.
In July 2009, the compensation committee also approved the 2010
Incremental Bonus Plan with modifications from prior years. The
2010 Incremental Bonus Plan will pay out to the senior
management team 15% of any Adjusted EBITDA in excess of our
target, which represents 20% Adjusted EBITDA margin performance
for fiscal year 2010 on 20% revenue growth over fiscal year
2009 net revenue. The incremental bonus plan allocates
differing amounts to executives based on their role and tenure
at the company and range between 1% of any Adjusted EBITDA over
the 20% margin target and 2.15% of such excess. In the event we
achieve the targeted Adjusted EBITDA in actual dollar amount but
such amount is less than 20% of net revenue, the compensation
committee retains the discretion to award a bonus to our CEO,
and our CEO retains the discretion to award bonuses to other
officers, based on the amount by which Adjusted EBITDA exceeded
the target in absolute dollars.
In January 2010, the compensation committee approved our Annual
Incentive Plan, which will first become effective for fiscal
year 2011. Under the Annual Incentive Plan, the compensation
committee may award bonuses to our employees, including our
executive offices, according to bonus targets and criteria set
by the compensation committee in accordance with the Annual
Incentive Plan. No bonus targets or criteria for bonuses for
fiscal year 2011 have been set. The Annual Incentive Plan is
designed to provide incentive compensation that is not subject
to the deductibility limitation of Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Long-Term
Equity Incentive Awards
The objective of our long-term, equity-based incentive awards is
to align the interests of our executives, including our named
executive officers, with the interests of our stockholders.
Because vesting is based on continued employment, our
equity-based incentive awards also encourage the retention of
our executive officers through the vesting period of the awards.
To reward and retain our executive officers in a manner that
best aligns employees interests with stockholders
interests, we use stock options as the primary incentive
vehicles for long-term compensation. We believe that stock
options are an effective tool for meeting our compensation goal
of increasing long-term stockholder value because the value of
stock options is closely tied to our future performance. Because
our executive officers are able to profit from stock options
only if our stock price increases relative to the stock
options exercise price, we believe stock options provide
meaningful incentives to them to achieve increases in the value
of our stock over time. Following the completion of this
offering, we expect our compensation committee to continue to
oversee our long-term equity incentive program.
We grant stock options both at the time of initial hire and then
through annual additional or refresher grants for
key employees and employees approaching full vesting of prior
grants. To date, there has been no set program for the award of
refresher grants, and our board of directors retains discretion
to make stock
84
option awards to employees at any time, including in connection
with the promotion of an employee, to reward an employee, for
retention purposes or for other circumstances recommended by
management. Refresher grants have generally been made shortly
after the end of the fiscal year.
In determining the size of the long-term equity incentive awards
to be granted to our executive officers, management and our
board of directors take into account a number of factors, such
as an executive officers relative job scope, the value of
existing long-term equity incentive awards, individual
performance history, prior contributions to us and the size of
prior awards. Based upon these factors, our board of directors
determines the size of the long-term equity incentive awards at
levels it considers appropriate to create a meaningful
opportunity for reward predicated on the creation of long-term
stockholder value.
The exercise price of each stock option grant is the fair market
value of our common stock on the grant date. For fiscal year
2009, the determination of the appropriate fair market value was
made by the board of directors. Our board of directors approves
option grants at its regular quarterly meetings and determines
the fair market value of our common stock at each of these
meetings. In the absence of a public trading market, the board
considered numerous objective and subjective factors to
determine its best estimate of the fair market value of our
common stock as of the date of each option grant, including but,
not limited to, the following: (i) our performance our
growth rate and financial condition at the approximate time of
the option grant; (ii) the stock price performance of a
peer group; (iii) future financial projections;
(iv) third party valuations of our common stock; and
(v) the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event for the
shares of common stock underlying these stock options, such as
an initial public offering or sale of our company, given
prevailing market conditions. We do not have any security
ownership requirements for our executive officers. We believe
these vesting schedules appropriately encourage long-term
employment with our company while allowing our executives to
realize compensation in line with the value they have created
for our stockholders.
As a privately-held company, there has been no market for our
common stock. Accordingly, in fiscal year 2009, we had no
program, plan or practice pertaining to the timing of stock
option grants to executive officers coinciding with the release
of material non-public information. The compensation committee
intends to adopt a formal policy regarding the timing of grants
in connection with this offering.
Consistent with the above criteria, in July 2008, our board
approved the grants of equity incentive awards to our executive
officers for our fiscal year 2009. With the exception of the
award to our CEO, these awards were recommended to the
compensation committee by our CEO. In the case of our CEO, the
equity incentive award was determined by the compensation
committee. In all cases, our CEO and compensation committee
considered each executive officers relative job scope, the
value of existing long-term equity incentive awards, individual
performance history, prior contributions to us and the size of
prior grants in determining the size of the award. The awards
were approved by the board of directors in July 2008.
For fiscal year 2010, the same procedure was followed. With the
exception of the award to our CEO, executive officers
equity incentive awards were recommended to the compensation
committee by our CEO. In the case of our CEO, the equity
incentive award was determined by the compensation committee. In
all cases, our CEO and compensation committee considered the
executives relative job scope, the value of existing
long-term equity incentive awards, individual performance
history, prior contributions to us and the size of prior grants
in determining the size of the award. The awards were approved
by the compensation committee and the board of directors at
their respective July 2009 meetings.
The actual equity awards granted to our named executive officers
in fiscal year 2009 are set forth in the Fiscal Year 2009
Summary Compensation Table.
Change in
Control Benefits
Our equity incentive plan typically provides for full
acceleration of vesting of outstanding stock options in the
event of a change in control of our company, if the options are
not assumed or substituted for by a successor. In the event
stock options are assumed or substituted for, then 25% of the
unvested shares subject to each option vest if the executive
officer is terminated under circumstances described under
Potential Payments Upon Termination Following
Change in Control following the change in control.
85
Perquisites
and Other Personal Benefits
We do not view perquisites as a significant element of our
executive compensation program currently, but do believe that
they can be useful in attracting, motivating and retaining the
executive talent for which we compete, and we may consider
providing additional perquisites in the future. All future
practices regarding perquisites will be approved and subject to
periodic review by our compensation committee.
We provide the following benefits to our executive officers,
generally on the same basis provided to all of our salaried
employees:
|
|
|
|
|
health, dental insurance and vision coverage;
|
|
|
|
life insurance;
|
|
|
|
a medical and dependent care flexible spending account;
|
|
|
|
short- and long-term disability, accidental death and
dismemberment insurance; and
|
|
|
|
a Section 401(k) plan.
|
We believe these benefits are consistent with those of companies
with which we compete for executive talent.
Tax
Considerations
We anticipate that our compensation committee will consider the
potential future effects of Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code on the compensation paid to our executive officers.
Section 162(m) disallows a tax deduction for any publicly
held corporation for individual compensation exceeding
$1.0 million in any taxable year for our CEO and each of
the other named executive officers (other than our chief
financial officer), unless compensation is performance based. As
our common stock is not currently publicly-traded, our
compensation committee has not previously taken the
deductibility limit imposed by Section 162(m) into
consideration in setting compensation. However, we expect that
our compensation committee will adopt a policy that, where
reasonably practicable, would qualify the variable compensation
paid to our executive officers for an exemption from the
deductibility limitations of Section 162(m). For example,
our Annual Incentive Plan, which will first take effect for
fiscal year 2011, is designed to provide incentive compensation
that is not subject to the limits of Section 162(m). In
approving the amount and form of compensation for our executive
officers in the future, our compensation committee will consider
all elements of the cost to our company of providing such
compensation, including the potential impact of
Section 162(m). However, our compensation committee may, in
its judgment, authorize compensation payments that do not comply
with the exemptions in Section 162(m) when it believes that
such payments are appropriate to attract and retain executive
talent.
86
Fiscal
Year 2009 Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes information regarding the
compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our chief
executive officer, our chief financial officer and our other
three most highly compensated executive officers during the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. We refer to these
individuals as our named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and Principal
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
($)
|
|
Douglas Valenti
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
451,500
|
|
|
$
|
304,321
|
|
|
$
|
386,243
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
1,142,307
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bronwyn Syiek
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
394,000
|
|
|
$
|
268,883
|
|
|
$
|
319,743
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
$
|
982,865
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Cheli
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
315,000
|
|
|
$
|
150,059
|
|
|
$
|
238,298
|
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
703,553
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Mackley
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
315,000
|
|
|
$
|
150,059
|
|
|
$
|
294,458
|
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
759,713
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Hahn
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
330,000
|
|
|
$
|
62,478
|
|
|
$
|
174,290
|
|
|
$
|
204
|
|
|
$
|
566,972
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts shown in this column do not reflect dollar amounts
actually received by our named executive officers. Instead,
these amounts reflect the dollar amount recognized for financial
statement reporting purposes for the referenced fiscal year, in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R).
Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are
included in Note 10 to our consolidated financial
statements included in this prospectus. As required by SEC
rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated
forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Our
named executive officers will only realize compensation to the
extent the trading price of our common stock is greater than the
exercise price of such stock options. |
|
(2) |
|
All other compensation represents amounts we pay towards
employee life insurance. |
Grant of
Plan-Based Awards
The following table provides information regarding all grants of
plan-based awards that were made to or earned by our named
executive officers during fiscal year 2009. Disclosure on a
separate line item is provided for each grant of an award made
to a named executive officer. The information in this table
supplements the dollar value of stock options and other awards
set forth in the Fiscal Year 2009 Summary Compensation
Table by providing additional details about the awards.
The option grants to purchase our common stock set forth in the
following table were made under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.
The exercise price of options granted under the 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan is equal to the fair market value of one share of
our common stock on the date of grant, except that certain
grants made to our CEO were granted with an exercise price equal
to 110% of the fair market value of one share of our common
stock on the date of grant. Under the 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan, the exercise price may be paid in cash or, after the
completion of this offering, in our common stock valued at fair
market value on the exercise date or through a cashless exercise
procedure involving a
same-day
sale of the purchased shares.
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payouts
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Number of
|
|
Base Price of
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Securities
|
|
Option
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Awards
|
|
Option
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Target ($)
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
($/Sh)
|
|
Awards ($)(1)
|
|
Douglas Valenti
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
$
|
393,658
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
304,500
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bronwyn Syiek
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
$
|
578,163
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
238,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Cheli
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
$
|
346,898
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
187,200
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Mackley
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
$
|
346,898
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
187,200
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Hahn
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
$
|
231,563
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
113,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts represent the total fair value of stock options granted
in fiscal year 2009, calculated in accordance with stock-based
compensation expense guidance. See Note 10 to our
consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus
for a discussion of assumptions made in determining the grant
date fair value and compensation expense of our stock options. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the executives target bonus under our 2009
Bonus Plan as of the date of grant. The plan provides for
individual bonus targets ranging from 29% of base salary to 67%
of base salary. Payout of the bonuses was dependent on
achievement against our plan for revenue growth and Adjusted
EBITDA and, where applicable, the individual executives
business units achievement against that units plan
for revenue growth and Adjusted EBITDA, as further described in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Actual
payments for fiscal year 2009 are set forth in the Fiscal
Year 2009 Summary Compensation Table above. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the executives target bonus under our 2009
Incremental Bonus Plan as of the date of grant. The 2009
Incremental Bonus Plan paid out to the senior management team
15% of any Adjusted EBITDA in excess of our target of 20%
Adjusted EBITDA margin for the year. The incremental bonus plan
allocated differing amounts to executives based on their role
and tenure at the company and ranged between 1% of any Adjusted
EBITDA over the 20% margin target and 2.25% of such excess. |
88
Outstanding
Equity Awards at June 30, 2009
The following table presents information regarding outstanding
equity awards held by our named executive officers as of
June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Option Expiration
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
(#)
|
|
Unexercisable (#)(1)
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
Date(2)
|
|
Douglas Valenti
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
July 24, 2015
|
|
|
January 31, 2007
|
|
|
99,687
|
|
|
|
65,313
|
|
|
$
|
10.34
|
|
|
January 30, 2017
|
Bronwyn Syiek
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
July 24, 2015
|
|
|
May 31, 2007
|
|
|
52,083
|
|
|
|
47,917
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
May 30, 2014
|
|
|
May 17, 2006
|
|
|
77,083
|
|
|
|
22,917
|
|
|
$
|
9.01
|
|
|
May 16, 2016
|
|
|
September 23, 2005
|
|
|
93,750
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
$
|
7.74
|
|
|
September 22, 2015
|
|
|
May 20, 2005
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.38
|
|
|
May 19, 2015
|
|
|
July 28, 2004
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.60
|
|
|
July 27, 2014
|
|
|
November 19, 2003
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.60
|
|
|
November 18, 2013
|
|
|
September 11, 2001
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
September 10, 2011
|
|
|
June 28, 2000
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
June 27, 2010
|
Tom Cheli
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
July 24, 2015
|
|
|
May 31, 2007
|
|
|
26,041
|
|
|
|
23,959
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
May 30, 2014
|
|
|
May 17, 2006
|
|
|
38,540
|
|
|
|
11,460
|
|
|
$
|
9.01
|
|
|
May 16, 2016
|
|
|
September 23, 2005
|
|
|
93,750
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
$
|
7.74
|
|
|
September 22, 2015
|
|
|
May 20, 2005
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.38
|
|
|
May 19, 2015
|
|
|
July 28, 2004
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.60
|
|
|
July 27, 2014
|
|
|
September 26, 2002
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
September 25, 2012
|
|
|
September 19, 2000
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
September 18, 2010
|
Scott Mackley
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
July 24, 2015
|
|
|
May 31, 2007
|
|
|
26,041
|
|
|
|
23,959
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
May 30, 2014
|
|
|
May 17, 2006
|
|
|
38,540
|
|
|
|
11,460
|
|
|
$
|
9.01
|
|
|
May 16, 2016
|
|
|
September 23, 2005
|
|
|
93,750
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
$
|
7.74
|
|
|
September 22, 2015
|
|
|
May 20, 2005
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.38
|
|
|
May 19, 2015
|
|
|
July 28, 2004
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.60
|
|
|
July 27, 2014
|
|
|
July 22, 2003
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
July 21, 2013
|
|
|
April 4, 2002
|
|
|
42,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
April 3, 2012
|
|
|
March 15, 2001
|
|
|
6,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
March 14, 2011
|
|
|
June 28, 2000
|
|
|
8,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
June 27, 2010
|
Kenneth Hahn
|
|
July 25, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
July 24, 2015
|
|
|
May 17, 2006
|
|
|
289,062
|
|
|
|
85,938
|
|
|
$
|
9.01
|
|
|
May 16, 2016
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Each stock option to our executive officers vests over a
four-year period as follows: 25% of the shares underlying the
option vest on the first anniversary of the date of the vesting
commencement date, which is the date of grant, and the remainder
of the shares underlying the option vest in equal monthly
installments over the remaining 36 months thereafter. Each
option also provides that 25% of the unvested shares subject to
such option will vest if the executive is terminated without
cause following a change in control. |
|
(2) |
|
In fiscal year 2007, our board of directors changed the default
term of option grants to seven years. |
89
Stock
Option Exercises During Fiscal Year 2009
The following table shows information regarding option exercises
by our named executive officers during fiscal year 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Realized on
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
Exercise
|
Name
|
|
Exercise (#)
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
Tom Cheli
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
$
|
29,991
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate dollar value realized upon exercise of an option
represents the difference between the aggregate fair market
value of our common stock underlying the option on the date of
exercise, which was determined by our board of directors to be
approximately $10.28 per share, and the aggregate exercise price
of the option. |
Pension
Benefits
We do not maintain any defined benefit pension plans.
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
We do not maintain any nonqualified deferred compensation plans.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination Following Change in Control
The following table sets forth quantitative estimates of the
option acceleration benefits (25% of the unvested portion) that
would have been received by the named executive officers
pursuant to their option agreements if, within six months
following a change in control, their employment had been
terminated by us without cause or resigns for good reason (which
includes actions by us to materially reduce the officers
duties, salary or benefits, or relocate the officers
business office to more than 50 miles away). These
estimates assume the change in control transaction and
termination both occurred on June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Awards ($)
|
Name
|
|
(1)
|
|
Douglas Valenti
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bronwyn Syiek
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
Tom Cheli
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
Scott Mackley
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
Kenneth Hahn
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate dollar value realized in connection the
acceleration of the equity awards represents the difference
between the aggregate fair market value of our common stock
underlying the accelerated options as of June 30, 2009,
which was determined by our board of directors to be
approximately $9.01 per share, and the aggregate exercise price
of the accelerated options. |
Offer
Letter Agreements
We have also entered into offer letter agreements with each of
our named executive officers, other than our CEO, in connection
with their commencement of employment with us. These offer
letter agreements typically include the executive officers
initial base salary and stock option grant along with vesting
provisions with respect to that initial stock option grant. The
offer letters do not provide for severance. The offer letters
require arbitration of certain disputes between the executive
and us. With the exception of the arbitration provisions, we
have no outstanding obligations under these agreements.
90
Proprietary
Information and Inventions Agreements
Each of our named executive officers has entered into a standard
form agreement with respect to proprietary information and
inventions. Among other things, this agreement obligates each
named executive officer to refrain from disclosing any of our
proprietary information received during the course of employment
and, with some exceptions, to assign to us any inventions
conceived or developed during the course of employment.
Employee
Benefit Plans
2008
Equity Incentive Plan
Our board of directors adopted and our stockholders approved the
2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, or 2008 Plan, in January
2008, as a restatement and replacement of our prior 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan originally adopted on July 1, 1999. The 2008
Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options,
nonstatutory stock options and restricted stock purchase awards.
As of December 31, 2009, 3,382,316 shares of common
stock had been issued upon the exercise of options granted under
the 2008 Plan, options to purchase 11,504,767 shares of
common stock were outstanding at a weighted average exercise
price of $9.3429 per share and 587,717 shares remained
available for future grant under the 2008 Plan. Upon the
execution and delivery of the underwriting agreement for this
offering, no further option or other stock award grants will be
made under the 2008 Plan.
Administration. Our board of directors
administers the 2008 Plan. Our board of directors, however, may
delegate this authority to a committee of two or more board
members. The board of directors or a committee of the board of
directors has the authority to construe, interpret, amend and
modify the 2008 Plan, as well as to determine the terms of an
option and a restricted stock purchase award. Our board of
directors may amend or modify the 2008 Plan at any time.
However, no amendment or modification shall adversely affect the
rights and obligations with respect to outstanding stock awards
unless the holder consents to that amendment or modification.
Eligibility. The 2008 Plan permits us to grant
stock options and restricted stock purchase awards to our
employees, directors and consultants. A stock option may be an
incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of
the Code or a nonstatutory stock option.
Stock Option Provisions Generally. In general,
the duration of a stock option granted under the 2008 Plan
cannot exceed 10 years. The exercise price of an incentive
stock option cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value
of the common stock on the date of grant. The exercise price of
a nonstatutory stock option cannot be less than 85% of the fair
market value of the common stock on the date of grant. An
incentive stock option may be transferred only on death, but a
nonstatutory stock option may be transferred as permitted in an
individual stock option agreement. Stock option agreements may
provide that the stock options may be early exercised subject to
our right of repurchase of unvested shares. In addition, our
board of directors may reprice any outstanding option or, with
the permission of the optionholder, may cancel any outstanding
option and grant a substitute option.
Incentive stock options may be granted only to our employees.
The aggregate fair market value, determined at the time of
grant, of shares of our common stock with respect to which
incentive stock options are exercisable for the first time by an
optionholder during any calendar year under all of our stock
plans may not exceed $100,000. An incentive stock option granted
to a person who at the time of grant owns or is deemed to own
more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes
of our outstanding stock or any of our affiliates must have a
term of no more than five years and an exercise price that is at
least 110% of fair market value at the time of grant.
Restricted Stock Purchase Awards
Generally. Restricted stock purchase awards may
be granted in consideration for cash, check or past or future
services actually rendered to us or our affiliates. Common stock
acquired under such awards may, but need not, be subject to
forfeiture in accordance with a vesting schedule. The purchase
price for restricted stock purchase awards may not be less than
110% of the fair market value in the case of awards granted to
any person who, at the time of the grant, owns or is deemed to
own stock
91
possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of
all classes of our outstanding stock or any of our affiliates.
Effect on Stock Awards of Certain Corporate
Transactions. If we dissolve or liquidate, then
outstanding stock options and restricted stock purchase awards
under the 2008 Plan will terminate immediately prior to such
dissolution or liquidation. In the event of an asset sale or
merger, the surviving or acquiring corporation may assume
outstanding stock awards, or may substitute substantially
equivalent awards that preserve the spread existing at the time
of the transaction for outstanding stock options. If the
surviving or acquiring corporation elects not to assume or
substitute for outstanding stock awards, then the stock awards
will terminate upon the consummation of the transaction. The
plan administrator may provide for additional vesting of
outstanding awards, either at the time of grant or at any time
while the award remains outstanding.
Other Provisions. If there is a transaction or
event which changes our stock that does not involve our receipt
of consideration, such as a merger, consolidation,
reorganization, stock dividend or stock split, our board of
directors will appropriately adjust the class and the maximum
number of shares subject to the 2008 Plan and to outstanding
stock awards to prevent the dilution or endangerment of benefits
thereunder.
2010
Equity Incentive Plan
Our board of directors adopted the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan,
or 2010 Incentive Plan, in November 2009 and our stockholders
approved the 2010 Incentive Plan in January 2010. The 2010
Incentive Plan will become effective immediately upon the
execution and delivery of the underwriting agreement for this
offering. The 2010 Incentive Plan will terminate on
November 16, 2019, unless sooner terminated by our board of
directors.
Stock Awards. The 2010 Incentive Plan provides
for the grant of incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock
options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards,
stock appreciation rights, performance-based stock awards, and
other forms of equity compensation, or collectively, stock
awards, all of which may be granted to employees, including
officers, non-employee directors and consultants. In addition,
the 2010 Incentive Plan provides for the grant of performance
cash awards. Incentive stock options may be granted only to
employees. All other awards may be granted to employees,
including officers, non-employee directors and consultants.
Share Reserve. Following this offering, the
aggregate number of shares of our common stock that may be
issued initially pursuant to stock awards under the 2010
Incentive Plan is the number of shares reserved for future
issuance under the 2008 Plan at the time of the execution and
delivery of the underwriting agreement for this offering, plus
any shares subject to outstanding stock awards granted under the
2008 Plan that expire or terminate for any reason prior to their
exercise or settlement. The number of shares of our common stock
reserved for issuance will automatically increase on
July 1st of each year, from July 1, 2010 through
July 1, 2019, by five percent of the total number of shares
of our common stock outstanding on the last day of the preceding
fiscal year, unless our board of directors determines that the
share increase shall be a lesser number. The maximum number of
shares that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of incentive
stock options under the 2010 Incentive Plan is 30,000,000.
If a stock award granted under the 2010 Incentive Plan expires
or otherwise terminates without being exercised in full, or is
settled in cash, the shares of our common stock not acquired
pursuant to the stock award again become available for
subsequent issuance under the 2010 Incentive Plan. In addition,
the following types of shares under the 2010 Incentive Plan may
become available for the grant of new stock awards under the
2010 Incentive Plan (a) shares that are forfeited to or
repurchased by us prior to becoming fully vested,
(b) shares withheld to satisfy income or employment
withholding taxes, (c) shares used to pay the exercise
price of an option in a net exercise arrangement and
(d) shares tendered to us to pay the exercise price of an
option. Shares issued under the 2010 Incentive Plan may be
previously unissued shares or reacquired shares bought on the
open market. As of the date hereof, none of our common stock
have been issued under the 2010 Incentive Plan.
92
Administration. Our board of directors has
delegated its authority to administer the 2010 Incentive Plan to
our compensation committee. Subject to the terms of the 2010
Incentive Plan, our board of directors or an authorized
committee, referred to as the plan administrator, determines
recipients, dates of grant, the numbers and types of stock
awards to be granted and the terms and conditions of the stock
awards, including the period of their exercisability and vesting
and the fair market value applicable to a stock award. Subject
to the limitations set forth below, the plan administrator will
also determine the exercise price of options granted, the
consideration to be paid for restricted stock awards and the
strike price of stock appreciation rights.
The compensation committee has the authority to reprice any
outstanding stock award under the 2010 Incentive Plan. The
compensation committee may also cancel and re-grant any
outstanding stock award with the consent of any affected
participant.
Stock Options. Incentive and nonstatutory
stock options are granted pursuant to incentive and nonstatutory
stock option agreements adopted by the plan administrator. The
plan administrator determines the exercise price for a stock
option, within the terms and conditions of the 2010 Incentive
Plan, provided that the exercise price of a stock option
generally cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of
our common stock on the date of grant. Options granted under the
2010 Incentive Plan vest at the rate specified by the plan
administrator.
The plan administrator determines the term of stock options
granted under the 2010 Incentive Plan, up to a maximum of
10 years, except in the case of certain incentive stock
options, as described below. Unless the terms of an
optionees stock option agreement provide otherwise, if an
optionees relationship with us, or any of our affiliates,
ceases for any reason other than disability or death, the
optionee may exercise any vested options for a period of three
months following the cessation of service. If an optionees
service relationship with us, or any of our affiliates, ceases
due to disability or death, or an optionee dies within a certain
period following cessation of service, the optionee or a
beneficiary may generally exercise any vested options for a
period of 12 months in the event of disability and
18 months in the event of death. The option term may be
extended in the event that exercise of the option following
termination of service is prohibited by applicable securities
laws. In no event, however, may an option be exercised beyond
the expiration of its term.
Acceptable consideration for the purchase of common stock issued
upon the exercise of a stock option will be determined by the
plan administrator and may include (a) cash, check, bank
draft or money order, (b) a broker-assisted cashless
exercise, (c) the tender of shares of common stock
previously owned by the optionee, (d) a net exercise of the
option and (e) other legal consideration approved by the
plan administrator.
Unless the plan administrator provides otherwise, options
generally are not transferable except by will, the laws of
descent and distribution, or pursuant to a domestic relations
order. An optionee may designate a beneficiary, however, who may
exercise the option following the optionees death.
Tax Limitations on Incentive Stock
Options. Incentive stock options may be granted
only to our employees. The aggregate fair market value,
determined at the time of grant, of our common stock with
respect to incentive stock options that are exercisable for the
first time by an optionee during any calendar year under all of
our stock plans may not exceed $100,000. No incentive stock
option may be granted to any person who, at the time of the
grant, owns or is deemed to own stock possessing more than 10%
of our total combined voting power or that of any of our
affiliates unless (a) the option exercise price is at least
110% of the fair market value of the stock subject to the option
on the date of grant, and (b) the term of the incentive
stock option does not exceed five years from the date of grant.
Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted stock
awards are granted pursuant to restricted stock award agreements
adopted by the plan administrator. Restricted stock awards may
be granted in consideration for (a) cash, check, bank draft
or money order, (b) past or future services rendered to us
or our affiliates, or (c) any other form of legal
consideration. Common stock acquired under a restricted stock
award may, but need not, be subject to a share repurchase option
in our favor in accordance with a vesting schedule to be
determined by the plan administrator. Rights to acquire shares
under a restricted stock award may be transferred only upon such
terms and conditions as set by the plan administrator.
93
Restricted Stock Unit Awards. Restricted stock
unit awards are granted pursuant to restricted stock unit award
agreements adopted by the plan administrator. Restricted stock
unit awards may be granted in consideration for any form of
legal consideration. A restricted stock unit award may be
settled by cash, delivery of stock, a combination of cash and
stock as deemed appropriate by the plan administrator, or in any
other form of consideration set forth in the restricted stock
unit award agreement. Additionally, dividend equivalents may be
credited in respect of shares covered by a restricted stock unit
award. Except as otherwise provided in the applicable award
agreement, restricted stock units that have not vested will be
forfeited upon the participants cessation of continuous
service for any reason.
Stock Appreciation Rights. Stock appreciation
rights are granted pursuant to stock appreciation rights
agreements adopted by the plan administrator. The plan
administrator determines the strike price for a stock
appreciation right which generally cannot be less than 100% of
the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right, we will pay the
participant an amount equal to the product of (a) the
excess of the per share fair market value of our common stock on
the date of exercise over the strike price, multiplied by
(b) the number of common stock with respect to which the
stock appreciation right is exercised. A stock appreciation
right granted under the 2010 Incentive Plan vests at the rate
specified in the stock appreciation right agreement as
determined by the plan administrator.
The plan administrator determines the term of stock appreciation
rights granted under the 2010 Incentive Plan, up to a maximum of
10 years. If a participants service relationship
ceases with us, or any of our affiliates, then the participant,
or the participants beneficiary, may exercise any vested
stock appreciation right for three months (or such longer or
shorter period specified in the stock appreciation right
agreement) after the date such service relationship ends or the
expiration of the term set forth in the award agreement. In no
event, however, may a stock appreciation right be exercised
beyond the expiration of its term.
Performance Awards. The 2010 Incentive Plan
permits the grant of performance-based stock and cash awards
that may qualify as performance-based compensation that is not
subject to the $1,000,000 limitation on the income tax
deductibility of compensation paid per covered executive officer
imposed by Section 162(m). To assure that the compensation
attributable to performance-based stock awards will so qualify,
our compensation committee can structure such awards so that
stock will be issued or paid pursuant to such award only upon
the achievement of certain pre-established performance goals
during a designated performance period.
Other Stock Awards. The plan administrator may
grant other awards based in whole or in part by reference to our
common stock. The plan administrator will set the number of
shares under the award and all other terms and conditions of
such awards.
Grants to Non-Employee Directors. Under the
2010 Incentive Plan, our compensation committee may grant
nonstatutory stock options to non-employee members of our board
of directors over their period of service on our board of
directors.
Changes to Capital Structure. In the event
that there is a specified type of change in our capital
structure, such as a stock split, appropriate adjustments will
be made to (a) the number of shares reserved under the 2010
Incentive Plan, (b) the maximum number of shares by which
the share reserve may increase automatically each year,
(c) the class and maximum number of shares that may be
issued upon the exercise of incentive stock options and
(d) the number of shares and exercise price or strike
price, if applicable, of all outstanding stock awards.
Corporate Transactions. In the event of
certain significant corporate transactions, then our board of
directors has the discretion to take any of the following
actions with respect to stock awards:
|
|
|
|
|
arrange for the assumption, continuation, or substitution of a
stock award by a surviving or acquiring entity or parent company;
|
|
|
|
arrange for the assignment of any reacquisition right held by us
to the surviving or acquiring entity;
|
|
|
|
accelerate the vesting of a stock award and provide for its
termination prior to the effective time of the corporate
transaction;
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
arrange for the lapse of any reacquisition or repurchase rights
held by us;
|
|
|
|
cancel or arrange for the cancellation of the stock award in
exchange for such cash consideration, if any, as our board may
deem appropriate; or
|
|
|
|
provide for the surrender of a stock award in exchange for a
payment equal to the excess of (a) the value of the
property that the optionee would have received upon exercise of
the stock award over (b) the exercise price otherwise
payable in connection with the stock award.
|
Our board of directors is not obligated to treat all stock
awards, even those that are of the same type, in the same manner.
Changes in Control. Our board of directors has
the discretion to provide that a stock award under the 2010
Incentive Plan will immediately vest as to all or any portion of
the shares subject to the stock award (a) immediately upon
the occurrence of certain specified change in control
transactions, whether or not such stock award is assumed,
continued or substituted by a surviving or acquiring entity in
the transaction or (b) in the event a participants
service with us or a successor entity is terminated actually or
constructively within a designated period following the
occurrence of certain specified change in control transactions.
Stock awards held by participants under the 2010 Incentive Plan
will not vest automatically on such an accelerated basis unless
specifically provided by the participants applicable award
agreement.
2010
Non-Employee Directors Stock Award Plan
Our board of directors adopted the Non-Employee Directors
Stock Award Plan, or Directors Plan, in November 2009 and
our stockholders approved the Directors Plan in January
2010. The Directors Plan will become effective immediately
upon the execution and delivery of the underwriting agreement
for this offering. The Directors Plan will terminate at
the discretion of our board of directors. The Directors
Plan provides for the automatic grant of nonstatutory stock
options to purchase shares of our common stock to our
non-employee directors. The Directors Plan also provides
for the discretionary grant of restricted stock units.
Share Reserve. An aggregate of
300,000 shares of our common stock are reserved for
issuance under the Directors Plan. This amount will be
increased annually on July 1, from 2010 until 2019, by the
sum of 200,000 shares and the aggregate number of shares of our
common stock subject to awards granted under the Directors
Plan during the immediately preceding fiscal year. However, our
board of directors will have the authority to designate a lesser
number of shares by which the share reserve will be increased.
Shares of our common stock subject to stock awards that have
expired or otherwise terminated under the Directors Plan
without having been exercised in full shall again become
available for grant under the Directors Plan. Shares of
our common stock issued under the Directors Plan may be
previously unissued shares or reacquired shares bought on the
market or otherwise. If the exercise of any stock option granted
under the Directors Plan is satisfied by tendering shares
of our common stock held by the participant, then the number of
shares tendered shall again become available for the grant of
awards under the Directors Plan. In addition, any shares
reacquired to satisfy income or employment withholding taxes
shall again become available for the grant of awards under the
Directors Plan.
Administration. Our board of directors has
delegated its authority to administer the Directors Plan
to our compensation committee.
Stock Options. Stock options will be granted
pursuant to stock option agreements. The exercise price of the
options granted under the Directors Plan will be equal to
100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of
grant. Initial grants vest in equal monthly installments over
three years after the date of grant and annual grants vest in
equal monthly installments over 12 months after the date of
grant.
In general, the term of stock options granted under the
Directors Plan may not exceed seven years. Unless the
terms of an option holders stock option agreement provides
otherwise, if an optionholders service relationship with
us, or any affiliate of ours, ceases due to death or disability,
then the optionholder or his or her beneficiary may exercise any
vested options for a period of 12 months in the event of
disability and
95
18 months in the event of death. If an optionholders
service with us, or any affiliate, ceases for any other reason,
the optionholder may exercise the vested options for up to six
months following cessation of service.
Acceptable consideration for the purchase of our common stock
issued under the Directors Plan may include cash, a
net exercise, common stock previously owned by the
optionholder or a program developed under Regulation T as
promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board.
Generally, an optionholder may not transfer a stock option other
than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. However,
an optionholder may transfer an option under certain
circumstances with our written consent if a
Form S-8
registration statement is available for the exercise of the
option and the subsequent resale of the shares. In addition, an
optionholder may designate a beneficiary who may exercise the
option following the optionholders death.
Non-discretionary
Grants
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Grant. Any person who becomes a
non-employee director after the completion of this offering will
automatically receive an initial grant of an option to purchase
20,000 shares of our common stock upon his or her election
or appointment, subject to adjustment by our board of directors
from time to time. These options will vest in equal monthly
installments over four years. These initial grants may also
be issued in the form of restricted stock awards if so
determined by our board of directors.
|
|
|
|
Annual Grant. In addition, any person who is a
non-employee director on the date of each annual meeting of our
stockholders automatically will be granted, on the annual
meeting date, beginning with our 2010 annual meeting, an option
to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock, or the
annual grant, subject to adjustment by our board of directors
from time to time. These options will vest in equal monthly
installments over 12 months. These annual grants may also
be issued in the form of restricted stock unit awards if so
determined by our board of directors.
|
Discretionary
Grants
In addition to the non-discretionary grants noted above, our
board of directors may grant stock awards to one or more
non-employee directors in such numbers and subject to such other
provisions as it shall determine. These awards may be in the
form of stock options or restricted stock awards and shall vest
pursuant to vesting schedules to be determined by our board of
directors in its sole discretion.
Changes to Capital Structure. In the event
there is a specified type of change in our capital structure not
involving the receipt of consideration by us, such as a stock
split or stock dividend, the number of shares reserved under the
Directors Plan, the maximum number of shares by which the
share reserve may increase automatically each year, the number
of shares subject to the initial and annual grants and the
number of shares and exercise price of all outstanding stock
options will be appropriately adjusted.
Change in Control Transactions. In the event
of certain change in control transactions, the vesting of
options held by non-employee directors whose service is
terminated generally will be accelerated in full.
Plan Amendments. Our board of directors will
have the authority to amend or terminate the Directors
Plan. However, no amendment or termination of the
directors plan will adversely affect any rights under
awards already granted to a participant unless agreed to by the
affected participant. We will obtain stockholder approval of any
amendment to the Directors Plan that is required by
applicable law.
401(k)
Plan
We maintain a defined contribution employee retirement plan, or
401(k) plan, for our employees. Our executive officers are also
eligible to participate in the 401(k) plan on the same basis as
our other employees. The 401(k) plan is intended to qualify as a
tax-qualified plan under Section 401(k) of the Code. The
plan provides that each participant may contribute up to the
statutory limit, which is $16,500 for calendar year 2009.
Participants that are 50 years or older can also make
catch-up
contributions, which in calendar year 2009 may be up to an
additional $5,500 above the statutory limit. The plan permits us
to make discretionary contributions and matching contributions,
subject to established limits and a vesting schedule. In fiscal
year 2009, we did not make any discretionary or matching
contributions on behalf of our named executive officers.
96
Limitation
of Liability and Indemnification
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, which
will be in effect upon the completion of this offering, contains
provisions that limit the liability of our directors for
monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware
General Corporation Law. Consequently, our directors will not be
personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages
for any breach of fiduciary duties as directors, except
liability for:
|
|
|
|
|
any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to us or our
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
any act or omission not in good faith or that involves
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
|
unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or
redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law; or
|
|
|
|
any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
Our amended and restated bylaws to be in effect upon completion
of this offering require us to indemnify our directors and
executive officers to the maximum extent not prohibited by the
Delaware General Corporation Law or any other applicable law and
allow us to indemnify other officers, employees and other agents
as set forth in the Delaware General Corporation Law or any
other applicable law.
We have entered, and intend to continue to enter, into separate
indemnification agreements with our directors and executive
officers, in addition to the indemnification provided for in our
amended and restated bylaws. These agreements, among other
things, require us to indemnify our directors and executive
officers for certain expenses, including attorneys fees,
judgments, penalties fines and settlement amounts actually and
reasonably incurred by a director or executive officer in any
action or proceeding arising out of their services as one of our
directors or executive officers, or any of our subsidiaries or
any other company or enterprise to which the person provides
services at our request, including liability arising out of
negligence or active or passive wrongdoing by the officer or
director. We believe that these charter provisions and
indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain
qualified persons as directors and officers. We also maintain
directors and officers liability insurance.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in
our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws may discourage stockholders from
bringing a lawsuit against our directors and officers for breach
of their fiduciary duty. They may also reduce the likelihood of
derivative litigation against our directors and officers, even
though an action, if successful, might benefit us and other
stockholders. Further, a stockholders investment may be
adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of
settlement and damage awards against directors and officers as
required by these indemnification provisions.
At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding
involving any of our directors or executive officers as to which
indemnification is required or permitted, and we are not aware
of any threatened litigation or proceeding that may result in a
claim for indemnification.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, executive officers
or persons controlling us, we have been informed that in the
opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy
as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore
unenforceable.
97
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following is a summary of transactions, during our last
three fiscal years, to which we have been a party in which the
amount involved exceeded $120,000 and in which any of our
executive officers, directors or beneficial holders of more than
5% of our capital stock had or will have a direct or indirect
material interest, other than compensation arrangements which
are described under the section of this prospectus entitled
Management Compensation Discussion and
Analysis.
Repurchases
of Securities
The following table summarizes shares of our common stock we
repurchased from certain of our executive officers since
July 1, 2006. We have not repurchased shares of common
stock from any of our directors or holders of more than 5% of
our capital stock since July 1, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
Shares Repurchased
|
|
Bronwyn Syiek
|
|
|
198,480
|
|
Tom Cheli
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Scott Mackley
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Price per share
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
Date of repurchase
|
|
|
10/18/07
|
|
We believe the terms obtained or consideration that we paid or
received, as applicable, in connection with the transactions
were comparable to terms available or the amounts that would be
paid or received, as applicable, in arms-length
transactions.
Second
Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement
We have entered into an investor rights agreement with the
purchasers of our outstanding convertible preferred stock,
including entities with which certain of our directors are
affiliated. As of December 31, 2009, the holders of
21,176,533 shares of our common stock, including the common
stock issuable upon the conversion of our preferred stock, are
entitled to rights with respect to the registration of their
shares following this offering under the Securities Act. For a
description of these registration rights, see Description
of Capital Stock Registration Rights.
In addition, the election of the members of our board of
directors is governed by certain provisions contained in our
investor rights agreement. The holders of a majority of our
Series A preferred stock, voting as a separate series, have
designated Gregory Sands and James Simons for election to our
board of directors. The holders of a majority of our
Series B preferred stock, voting as a separate series, have
designated Glenn Solomon for election to our board of directors.
The holders of a majority of our common stock and preferred
stock, voting together as a class on as-converted basis, have
designated Douglas Valenti, William Bradley, John McDonald and
Dana Stalder. Upon the closing of this offering, the board
election voting provisions contained in the investor rights
agreement will terminate and none of our stockholders will have
any special rights regarding the election or designation of
members of our board of directors.
Offer
Letters and Proprietary Information and Inventions
Agreements
We have entered into at-will offer letters and proprietary
information and inventions agreements with our executive
officers. For more information regarding these agreements, see
Executive Compensation Offer Letter
Agreements and Executive Compensation
Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreements.
Other
Transactions
Katrina Boydon serves as our Vice President of Content and
Compliance and is the sister of Bronwyn Syiek, our President and
Chief Operating Officer. Ms. Boydons fiscal year 2010
base salary is $192,938 per year, and she has a fiscal year 2010
target bonus of $67,170. In fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009,
Ms. Boydon received a base salary of $140,000 (later
increased to $158,000), $165,000 (later increased to $175,000)
and
98
$183,750 per year, respectively, and a bonus payout of $46,000,
$45,000 and $51,381, respectively. In fiscal years 2007, 2008,
2009 and 2010, Ms. Boydon was granted options to purchase
an aggregate of 64,000, 20,000, 30,000 and 45,000 shares of
our common stock, respectively.
Rian Valenti serves as a client sales and development associate
and is the son of Douglas Valenti, our Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman. Mr. Rian Valentis fiscal year 2010 base
salary is $54,000 per year, and he has a fiscal year 2010
commission opportunity of $45,000. Mr. Rian Valenti joined
us in fiscal year 2009 with a base salary of $52,000. In fiscal
year 2009, Mr. Rian Valenti received an aggregate of $2,000
in commissions. In fiscal year 2009, Mr. Rian Valenti was
granted an option to purchase an aggregate of 1,500 shares
of our common stock.
We had a preferred publisher agreement with Remilon LLC, an
online publishing entity, one of whose primary owners is Ben
Wilson, the
brother-in-law
of Tom Cheli, our Executive Vice President. We have been advised
that Mr. Wilson owns one third of the equity interests of
Remilon. Under the preferred publisher agreement, we paid
commissions for qualified leads generated from links on
Remilons website. We paid commissions to Remilon for
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009 of $3,109,000, $3,070,000,
$4,204,000, $1,946,000 and $2,226,000, respectively. Based
solely on our understanding of Mr. Wilsons ownership
interest in Remilon, and without regard to the amount of profit
or loss and any contractual arrangements among the owners of
Remilon, Mr. Wilsons interest in the commissions paid to
Remilon for fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the six months
ended December 31, 2009 was approximately $1,036,333,
$1,023,333, $1,401,333 and $742,000, respectively. We believe
these commissions were comparable to those that would be payable
in arms-length dealings with an unrelated third party. This
contract expired in October 2009.
We have granted stock options to our executive officers and
certain of our directors. For a description of these options,
see Executive Compensation Outstanding Equity
Awards at June 30, 2009. Each stock option issued to
our executive officers provides that 25% of the unvested shares
subject to such option will vest if the executive is terminated
without cause following a change in control.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our
directors and executive officers. These indemnification
agreements require us to indemnify each of our directors and
executive officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware
law. See Management Limitation of Liability
and Indemnification.
Policies
and Procedures for Transactions with Related Persons
Our board of directors has adopted a written related person
transaction policy, which sets forth the policies and procedures
for the review and approval or ratification of related person
transactions. This policy covers any transaction, arrangement or
relationship, or any series of similar transactions,
arrangements or relationships, in which we were or are to be a
participant, the amount involved exceeds $60,000 and a related
person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
While the policy covers related party transactions in which the
amount involved exceeds $60,000, only related party transactions
in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 will be required
to be disclosed in applicable filings as required by the
Securities Act, Exchange Act and related rules. Our board of
directors intends to set the $60,000 threshold for approval of
related party transactions in the policy at an amount lower than
that which is required to be disclosed under the Securities Act,
Exchange Act and related rules because we believe it is
appropriate for our audit committee to review transactions or
potential transactions in which the amount involved exceeds
$60,000, as opposed to $120,000. Pursuant to this policy, our
audit committee will (i) review the relevant facts and
circumstances of each related party transaction, including if
the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be
obtained in arms-length dealings with an unrelated
third-party and the extent of the related partys interest
in the transaction and (ii) take into account the conflicts
of interest and corporate opportunity provisions of our code of
business conduct and ethics. Management will present to our
audit committee each proposed related party transaction,
including all relevant facts and circumstances relating thereto,
and will update the audit committee as to any material changes
to any related party transaction.
99
All related party transactions may only be consummated if our
audit committee has approved or ratified such transaction in
accordance with the guidelines set forth in the policy. Certain
types of transactions are not subject to the policy, including:
(i) compensation arrangements approved by our Compensation
Committee; (ii) transactions in the ordinary course of
business where the related partys interest arises only
(a) from his or her position as an employee (other than a
position as an executive officer, partner, principal or similar
control position) of another entity that is party to the
transaction or (b) from an equity interest of less than 5%
in another entity that is party to the transaction; and
(iii) transactions in the ordinary course of business where
the interest of the related party arises solely from the
ownership of a class of equity securities in our company where
all holders of such class of equity securities will receive the
same benefit on a pro rata basis. No director may participate in
the approval of a related party transaction for which he or she
is a related party.
100
PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of December 31,
2009, and as adjusted to reflect the sale of
10,000,000 shares of common stock in this offering, for:
|
|
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers;
|
|
|
|
each of our directors;
|
|
|
|
all of our current officers and directors as a group; and
|
|
|
|
each person, or group of affiliated persons, known by us to
beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock.
|
The percentage ownership information shown in the table is based
upon 34,912,597 shares of common stock outstanding as of
December 31, 2009 and assuming the conversion of all
outstanding shares of our preferred stock as of
December 31, 2009. The table shows the percentage
ownership following the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of
common stock in this offering. The percentage ownership
information assumes no exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option.
We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These rules
generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities to
persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment
power with respect to those securities. In addition, the rules
include common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock
options that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable
on or before March 1, 2010, which is 60 days after
December 31, 2009. These shares are deemed to be
outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding those
options for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of
that person, but they are not treated as outstanding for the
purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other
person. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons or entities
identified in this table have sole voting and investment power
with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them,
subject to applicable community property laws.
101
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner
listed in the table below is
c/o QuinStreet,
Inc., 1051 East Hillsdale Blvd., Foster City, California 94404.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Before the
|
|
|
After the
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
5% Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas Valenti(1)
|
|
|
6,393,475
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
Entities affiliated with Split Rock Partners(2)
|
|
|
5,682,951
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
10400 Viking Drive. Suite 550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minneapolis, MN 55344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Sutter Hill Ventures(3)
|
|
|
3,655,681
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
755 Page Mill Road,
Suite A-200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palo Alto, CA
94304-1005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with GGV Capital(4)
|
|
|
2,666,975
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
2494 Sand Hill Road, Suite 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Menlo Park, CA 94025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W Capital Partners II, L.P.(5).
|
|
|
2,376,228
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
One East 52nd Street, 5th Floor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Catterton Partners(6)
|
|
|
2,033,899
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
599 West Putnam Avenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenwich, CT 06830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Partech International(7)
|
|
|
1,913,620
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
50 California Street, #3200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas Valenti(1)
|
|
|
6,393,475
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
Bronwyn Syiek(8)
|
|
|
858,502
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Kenneth Hahn(9)
|
|
|
321,353
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Tom Cheli(10)
|
|
|
479,269
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Scott Mackley(11)
|
|
|
610,935
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
William Bradley(12)
|
|
|
204,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John McDonald(13)
|
|
|
214,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gregory Sands(14)
|
|
|
3,779,990
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
James Simons(15)
|
|
|
5,707,951
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
Glenn Solomon(16)
|
|
|
2,691,975
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Dana Stalder(17)
|
|
|
228,900
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All officers and directors as a group
(16 persons)(18)
|
|
|
22,279,444
|
|
|
|
57.6
|
%
|
|
|
45.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent (1%) of
the outstanding common stock. |
|
(1) |
|
Includes 3,985,738 shares held by The Valenti Living Trust
of which Mr. Valenti and his wife, Terri Valenti, are
co-trustees, 2,240,000 shares held by DJ & TL
Valenti Investments, LP, of which The Valenti Living Trust is
the general partner, and 6,905 shares held by
Mr. Valenti and his immediate family members. Each of Mr.
Valenti and Terri Valenti have voting and investment power with
respect to the shares held by The Valenti Living Trust and share
beneficial ownership in such shares. Each of Mr. Valenti and
Terri Valenti also have voting and investment power with respect
to the shares held by DJ and TL Valenti Investments, LP, through
their control as co-trustees of the general partner, The Valenti
Living Trust. Also includes stock options exercisable for
160,832 shares of our common stock within 60 days of
December 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Consists of 5,561,627 shares held by SPVC V, LLC and
121,324 shares held by SPVC Affiliates Fund I, LLC.
Split Rock Partners, LLC, together with Vestbridge Partners,
LLC, is the manager of SPVC V, LLC and SPVC Affiliates
Fund I, LLC, however, voting and investment power are
delegated solely to Split Rock Partners, LLC. Michael Gorman,
James Simons, David Stassen and Allan Will, as managing
directors of Split Rock Partners, LLC, share voting and
investment power with respect to the shares held |
102
|
|
|
|
|
by SPVC V, LLC and SPVC Affiliates Fund I, LLC and
disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares except to the
extent of any pecuniary interest therein. |
|
(3) |
|
Consists of 3,509,543 shares held by Sutter Hill Ventures,
LP, 104,764 shares held by Sutter Hill Entrepreneurs Fund
(QP), LP and 41,374 shares held by Sutter Hill
Entrepreneurs Fund (AI), LP. Gregory Sands, David L. Anderson,
G. Leonard Baker, Jr., Jeffrey W. Bird, Tench Coxe,
James C. Gaither, Andrew T. Sheehan, Michael L. Speiser, David
E. Sweet, James N. White and William H. Younger, Jr. share
voting and investment power over these shares and disclaim
beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of any
pecuniary interest therein. |
|
(4) |
|
Consists of 1,493,068 shares held by Granite Global
Ventures III L.P., 1,114,187 shares held by Granite
Global Ventures II L.P., 36,401 shares held by
GGV III Entrepreneurs Fund L.P. and 23,319 shares held
by GGV II Entrepreneurs Fund L.P. Granite Global
Ventures III L.L.C. is the General Partner of Granite
Global Ventures III L.P. and GGV III Entrepreneurs
Fund L.P. Mr. Solomon, Mr. Ng, Mr. Nada,
Mr. Bonham, Mr. Foo, Ms. Lee, Mr. Zhan and
Ms. Jin share voting and investment authority over the
shares held by Granite Global Ventures III L.P. and GGV III
Entrepreneurs Fund L.P., and disclaim beneficial ownership
of such shares except to the extent of any pecuniary interest
therein. Granite Global Ventures II L.L.C. is the General
Partner of Granite Global Ventures II L.P. and GGV II
Entrepreneurs Fund L.P. Mr. Solomon, Mr. Ng, Mr.
Nada, Mr. Bonham, Mr. Foo and Ms. Lee share
voting and investement power over the shares held by Granite
Global Ventures II L.P. and GGV Entrepreneurs
Fund L.P., and disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares
except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
The sole general partner of W Capital Partners II, L.P. is WCP
GP II, L.P. and the sole general partner of WCP GP II, L.P. is
WCP GP II, LLC. The managing members of WCP GP II, LLC exercise
voting and investment power over securities held by W Capital
Partners II, L.P. The managing members of WCP GP II, LLC are
Stephen Wertheimer, David Wachter and Robert Migliorino, each of
whom disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities held by W
Capital Partners II, L.P., except to the extent of any pecuniary
interest therein. |
|
(6) |
|
Consists of 904,937 shares held by Catterton Partners IV,
L.P., 762,885 shares held by Catterton Partners IV
Offshore, L.P., 317,263 shares held by Catterton Partners
IV-A, L.P., 26,695 shares held by Catterton
Partners IV Special Purpose, L.P. and 22,119 shares
held by Catterton Partners IV-B, L.P. Catterton Managing Partner
IV, L.L.C. is the general partner of Catterton Partners IV,
L.P., Catterton Partners IV-A, L.P. and Catterton Partners IV-B,
L.P. and the managing general partner of Catterton Partners IV
Special Purpose, L.P. and Catterton Partners IV Offshore, L.P.
CP4 Principals, L.L.C. is the Managing Member of Catterton
Managing Partner IV, L.L.C. CP4 Principals is managed by a
managing board. The members of the managing board are J. Michael
Chu and Scott A. Dahnke. These individuals disclaim beneficial
ownership of such shares except to the extent of any pecuniary
interest therein. |
|
(7) |
|
Consists of 642,226 shares held by Partech International
Growth II LLC, 513,783 shares held by Partech
International Growth III LLC, 385,866 shares held by
Partech U.S. Partners IV LLC, 128,446 shares held by
Partech International Growth I LLC, 205,513 shares
held by AXA Growth Capital II L.P., 25,689 shares held
by Double Black Diamond II LLC and 12,097 shares held
by PAR SF II LLC. Vincent Worms has sole voting and
investment authority over all such shares. Mr. Worms
disclaims beneficial ownership of all such shares except to the
extent of any pecuniary interest therein. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 4,760 shares held in a trust for the benefit of
Ms. Syieks stepdaughter for which Ms. Syiek is
the custodian. Also includes stock options exercisable for
817,976 shares of our common stock within 60 days of
December 31, 2009. |
|
(9) |
|
Represents stock options exercisable for shares of our common
stock within 60 days of December 31, 2009. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes stock options exercisable for 472,279 shares of
our common stock within 60 days of December 31, 2009. |
|
(11) |
|
Includes stock options exercisable for 568,228 shares of
our common stock within 60 days of December 31, 2009. |
103
|
|
|
(12) |
|
Includes stock options exercisable for 200,000 shares of
our common stock within 60 days of December 31, 2009. |
|
(13) |
|
Includes 14,000 shares held in a family trust of which
Mr. McDonald is a trustee. Also, includes stock options
exercisable for 200,000 shares of our common stock within
60 days of December 31, 2009. |
|
(14) |
|
Includes 77,612 shares held in family trusts for which
Mr. Sands and his spouse are trustees, 6,785 shares
held in a charitable remainder unitrust for which Mr. Sands
is the trustee and 14,912 shares held in irrevocable trusts for
the benefit of Mr. Sands minor children. Also
includes 3,509,543 shares held by Sutter Hill Ventures, LP,
104,764 shares held by Sutter Hill Entrepreneurs Fund (QP),
LP and 41,374 shares held by Sutter Hill Entrepreneurs Fund
(AI), LP. Mr. Sands is a Managing Director of Sutter Hill
Ventures. Mr. Sands disclaims beneficial ownership of the
shares held by Sutter Hill Ventures except to the extent of his
proportionate pecuniary interest therein. Also includes stock
options exercisable for 25,000 shares of our common stock
within 60 days of December 31, 2009. |
|
(15) |
|
Includes 5,561,627 shares held by SPVC V, LLC and
121,324 shares held by SPVC Affiliates Fund I, LLC.
Mr. Simons is a Managing Director of Split Rock Partners
LLC, the manager of SPVC V, LLC and SPVC Affiliates
Fund I, LLC. Mr. Simons, together with
Mr. Gorman, Mr. Stassen and Mr. Will share voting
and investment power with respect to the shares held by
SPVC V, LLC and SPVC Affiliates Fund I, LLC.
Mr. Simons disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares
except to the extent of his proportionate pecuniary interest
therein. Also includes stock options exercisable for
25,000 shares of our common stock within 60 days of
December 31, 2009. |
|
(16) |
|
Includes 1,493,068 shares held by Granite Global
Ventures III L.P., 1,114,187 shares held by Granite
Global Ventures II L.P., 36,401 shares held by
GGV III Entrepreneurs Fund L.P. and 23,319 shares held
by GGV II Entrepreneurs Fund L.P. Mr. Solomon is a
Managing Director of Granite Global Ventures III L.L.C., the
General Partner of Granite Global Ventures III L.P. and GGV
III Entrepreneurs Fund L.P. He is also a Managing Director of
Granite Global Ventures II, L.L.C., the General Partner of
Granite Global Ventures II L.P. and GGV II Entrepreneurs Fund
L.P. Mr. Solomon, Mr. Ng, Mr. Nada,
Mr. Bonham, Mr. Foo, Ms. Lee, Mr. Zhuo and
Ms. Jin share voting and investment authority over the
shares held by Granite Global Ventures III L.P. and GGV III
Entrepreneurs Fund L.P. Mr. Solomon, Mr. Ng,
Mr. Nada, Mr. Bonham, Mr. Foo and Ms. Lee
share voting and investment authority over the shares held by
Granite Global Ventures II L.P. and GGV II Entrepreneurs Fund
L.P. Mr. Solomon disclaims beneficial ownership of these
shares except to the extent of his proportionate pecuniary
interest therein. Does not include a maximum of 34,257 shares
held by entities affiliated with Partech International.
Mr. Solomon was associated with Partech International prior
to joining GGV Capital. These shares represent Mr.
Solomons maximum pecuniary interest in the shares held by
entities affiliated with Partech International. Mr. Solomon
has no voting or investment authority over these shares. Also
includes stock options exercisable for 25,000 shares of our
common stock within 60 days of December 31, 2009. |
|
(17) |
|
Includes 3,900 shares held in a family trust for which
Mr. Stalder is the trustee. Also includes stock options
exercisable for 225,000 shares of our common stock within
60 days of December 31, 2009. |
|
(18) |
|
Includes stock options exercisable for an aggregate of 3,753,768
shares of our common stock within 60 days of
December 31, 2009 that are held by our directors and
officers as a group. |
104
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
General
Upon the completion of this offering, our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation will authorize us to issue up to
100,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value
per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock,
$0.001 par value per share. The following information
reflects the filing of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and the conversion of all outstanding shares of
our preferred stock into shares of common stock immediately
prior to the completion of this offering.
As of December 31, 2009, there were outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
34,912,597 shares of common stock held by approximately 304
stockholders of record; and
|
|
|
|
11,504,767 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding stock options pursuant to our 2008
Equity Incentive Plan and having a weighted average exercise
price of $9.3429 per share.
|
All of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock and
convertible preferred stock are duly authorized, validly issued,
fully paid and non-assessable. Our shares of common stock are
not redeemable and, following the closing of this offering, will
not have preemptive rights.
The following description of our capital stock and provisions of
our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws are summaries and are qualified by
reference to the amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and the amended and restated bylaws that will be
in effect upon the completion of this offering. Copies of these
documents will be filed with the SEC as exhibits to our
registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.
The descriptions of the common stock and preferred stock reflect
changes to our capital structure that will occur upon the
closing of this offering.
Common
Stock
Dividend Rights. Subject to preferences that
may be applicable to any then outstanding preferred stock,
holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends,
if any, as may be declared from time to time by our board of
directors out of legally available funds.
Voting Rights. Each holder of our common stock
is entitled to one vote for each share on all matters submitted
to a vote of the stockholders, including the election of
directors. Our stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights
in the election of directors. Accordingly, holders of a majority
of the voting shares are able to elect all of the directors.
Liquidation. In the event of our liquidation,
dissolution or winding up, holders of our common stock will be
entitled to share ratably in the net assets legally available
for distribution to stockholders after the payment of all of our
debts and other liabilities and the satisfaction of any
liquidation preference granted to the holders of any then
outstanding shares of preferred stock.
Rights and Preferences. Holders of our common
stock have no preemptive, conversion, subscription or other
rights, and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions
applicable to our common stock. The rights, preferences and
privileges of the holders of our common stock are subject to and
may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of
shares of any series of our preferred stock that we may
designate in the future.
Preferred
Stock
Upon the completion of this offering, our board of directors
will have the authority, without further action by our
stockholders, to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred
stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences,
privileges and restrictions thereof. These rights, preferences
and privileges could include dividend rights, conversion rights,
voting rights, terms of redemption, liquidation preferences,
sinking fund terms and the number of shares constituting any
series or the designation of such series, any or all of which
may be greater than the rights of common stock. The issuance of
our preferred stock could adversely affect
105
the voting power of holders of common stock and the likelihood
that such holders will receive dividend payments and payments
upon liquidation. In addition, the issuance of preferred stock
could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a
change of control of our company or other corporate action. Upon
the completion of this offering, no shares of preferred stock
will be outstanding, and we have no present plan to issue any
shares of preferred stock.
Registration
Rights
Demand Registration Rights. After
180 days following the completion of this offering (subject
to extension under certain circumstances), the holders of
approximately 21,176,533 shares of our common stock will be
entitled to certain demand registration rights. At any time, the
holders of a majority of such shares can, on not more than one
occasion in any
12-month
period, request that we register all or a portion of their
shares. If we are eligible to register such demand registration
on
Form S-3,
the request for registration must cover that at least that
number of shares with an anticipated gross aggregate offering
price of at least $1,000,000. If we are able to register the
sale of shares pursuant to these demand rights on
Form S-1
but not
Form S-3,
the request for registration must either cover at least 20% of
the unregistered common shares issued upon conversion of or
otherwise in exchange for former preferred shares or cover at
least that number of shares with an anticipated gross aggregate
offering price of at least $5,000,000. If we determine that it
would be seriously detrimental to our stockholders to effect
such a demand registration and it is essential to defer such
registration, we have the right to defer such registration, not
more than once in any one-year period, for a period of up to
120 days.
Piggyback Registration Rights. After the
completion of this offering, in the event that we propose to
register any of our securities under the Securities Act, either
for our own account or for the account of other security
holders, the holders of approximately 21,176,533 shares of
our common stock will be entitled to certain
piggyback registration rights allowing the holder to
include their shares in such registration, subject to certain
marketing and other limitations. As a result, whenever we
propose to file a registration statement under the Securities
Act, other than with respect to a registration related to
employee benefit plans or corporate reorganizations, the holders
of these shares are entitled to notice of the registration and
have the right, subject to limitations that the underwriters may
impose on the number of shares included in the registration, to
include their shares in the registration.
Other Terms. We will pay the registration
expenses of the holders of the shares registered pursuant to the
demand and piggyback registrations described above. In an
underwritten offering, the managing underwriter, if any, has the
right, subject to specified conditions, to limit the number of
shares such holders may include.
The demand and piggyback registration rights described above
will expire, with respect to any particular stockholder, the
earlier of three years after our initial public offering or when
that stockholder can sell all of its shares under Rule 144
of the Securities Act during any three-month period and such
stockholder owns less than two percent of our outstanding stock.
None of the demand or piggyback registration rights described
above are applicable to this offering.
Anti-Takeover
Provisions
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to be in Effect Upon
the Completion of this Offering. Our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation to be in effect upon the
completion of this offering will provide for our board of
directors to be divided into three classes with staggered
three-year terms. Only one class of directors will be elected at
each annual meeting of our stockholders, with the other classes
continuing for the remainder of their respective three-year
terms. Because our stockholders do not have cumulative voting
rights, stockholders holding a majority of the shares of common
stock outstanding will be able to elect all of our directors.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws to be effective upon the completion
of this offering will also provide that all stockholder actions
must be effected at a duly called meeting of stockholders and
not by a consent in writing, and that only our board of
directors,
106
chairman of the board, chief executive officer or the board of
directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the
total number of authorized directors may call a special meeting
of stockholders.
The foregoing provisions will make it more difficult for our
existing stockholders to replace our board of directors, as well
as for another party to obtain control of us by replacing our
board of directors. Since our board of directors has the power
to retain and discharge our officers, these provisions could
also make it more difficult for existing stockholders or another
party to effect a change in management. In addition, the
authorization of undesignated preferred stock makes it possible
for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting
or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of
any attempt to change our control.
These provisions are intended to enhance the likelihood of
continued stability in the composition of our board of directors
and its policies and to discourage certain types of transactions
that may involve an actual or threatened acquisition of us.
These provisions are also designed to reduce our vulnerability
to an unsolicited acquisition proposal and to discourage certain
tactics that may be used in proxy fights. However, such
provisions could have the effect of discouraging others from
making tender offers for our shares and may have the effect of
deterring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in our control
or management. As a consequence, these provisions also may
inhibit fluctuations in the market price of our stock that could
result from actual or rumored takeover attempts.
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law. Upon the completion of this offering, we
will be subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, which prohibits a Delaware corporation from
engaging in any business combination with any interested
stockholder for a period of three years after the date that such
stockholder became an interested stockholder, with the following
exceptions:
|
|
|
|
|
before such date, the board of directors of the corporation
approved either the business combination or the transaction that
resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;
|
|
|
|
upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the
corporation outstanding at the time the transaction began,
excluding for purposes of determining the voting stock
outstanding (but not the outstanding voting stock owned by the
interested stockholder) those shares owned (i) by persons
who are directors and also officers and (ii) employee stock
plans in which employee participants do not have the right to
determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan
will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or
|
|
|
|
on or after such date, the business combination is approved by
the board of directors and authorized at an annual or special
meeting of the stockholders, and not by written consent, by the
affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
In general, Section 203 defines business combination to
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
any merger or consolidation involving the corporation and the
interested stockholder;
|
|
|
|
any sale, transfer, pledge or other disposition of 10% or more
of the assets of the corporation involving the interested
stockholder;
|
|
|
|
subject to certain exceptions, any transaction that results in
the issuance or transfer by the corporation of any stock of the
corporation to the interested stockholder;
|
|
|
|
any transaction involving the corporation that has the effect of
increasing the proportionate share of the stock or any class or
series of the corporation beneficially owned by the interested
stockholder; or
|
|
|
|
the receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit of any
loss, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits
by or through the corporation.
|
In general, Section 203 defines an interested
stockholder as an entity or person who, together with the
persons affiliates and associates, beneficially owns, or
within three years prior to the time of determination of
interested stockholder status did own, 15% or more of the
outstanding voting stock of the corporation.
107
Contractual
Obligations
Under our credit facility, most change of control transactions
will require repayment of all indebtedness under the credit
facility.
Limitations
of Liability and Indemnification
See Executive Compensation Limitation of
Liability and Indemnification.
NASDAQ
Global Select Market Listing
Our common stock has been approved for listing on The NASDAQ
Global Select Market under the symbol QNST.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock will be
BNY Mellon Shareowner Services after the completion of this
offering.
108
SHARES ELIGIBLE
FOR FUTURE SALE
Immediately prior to this offering, there has been no public
market for our common stock. Future sales of substantial amounts
of shares of our common stock in the public market could
adversely affect prevailing market prices. Furthermore, since
only a limited number of shares will be available for sale
shortly after this offering because of contractual and legal
restrictions on resale described below, sales of substantial
amounts of common stock in the public market after the
restrictions lapse could adversely affect the prevailing market
price for our common stock, as well as our ability to raise
equity capital in the future.
Based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of
December 31, 2009, upon the completion of this offering,
44,912,597 shares of our common stock will be outstanding,
assuming no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option and no exercise of options. All 10,000,000 shares of
common stock sold in this offering will be freely tradable
unless held by one of our affiliates, as that term is defined in
Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
The remaining 34,912,597 shares of our common stock
outstanding after this offering are restricted securities as
such term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act
or are subject to
lock-up
agreements as described below. Following the expiration of the
lock-up
period, restricted securities may be sold in the public market
only if registered or if they qualify for an exemption from
registration under Rule 144 or 701 promulgated under the
Securities Act, described in greater detail below. The
34,912,597 shares will generally become available for sale
in the public market as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
substantially all of such shares will be subject to lock-up
agreements and will not be eligible for immediate sale upon the
completion of this offering;
|
|
|
|
all such restricted shares will be eligible for sale under
Rule 144 or Rule 701 upon expiration of
lock-up
agreements at least 180 days after the date of this
offering, provided that certain shares held by affiliates will
be subject to the volume limitations described below.
|
Rule 144
In general, a person who has beneficially owned restricted
shares of our common stock for at least six months would be
entitled to sell their securities provided that (i) such
person is not deemed to have been one of our affiliates at the
time of, or at any time during the three months preceding, a
sale and (ii) we are subject to and compliant with the
Exchange Act periodic reporting requirements for at least
90 days before the sale. In addition, under Rule 144,
any person who is not an affiliate of ours, has not been an
affiliate of ours during the preceding three months and has held
their shares for at least one year, including the holding period
of any prior owner other than one of our affiliates, would be
entitled to sell an unlimited number of shares immediately upon
the closing of this offering without regard to whether current
public information about us is available. Persons who have
beneficially owned restricted shares of our common stock for at
least six months but who are our affiliates at the time of, or
any time during the 90 days preceding, a sale, would be
subject to additional restrictions, by which such person would
be entitled to sell within any three-month period only a number
of securities that does not exceed the greater of either of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the number of shares of our common stock then outstanding,
which will equal approximately 449,125 shares immediately
after this offering, assuming no exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option, based on the number of
shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31,
2009; or
|
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of our common stock on The
NASDAQ Global Market during the four calendar weeks preceding
the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale;
|
provided, in each case, that we are subject to the
Exchange Act periodic reporting requirements for at least
90 days before the sale. Such sales both by affiliates and
by non-affiliates must also comply with the manner of sale,
current public information and notice provisions of
Rule 144.
109
Rule 701
Rule 701 under the Securities Act, as in effect on the date
of this prospectus, permits resales of shares in reliance upon
Rule 144 but without compliance with certain restrictions
of Rule 144, including the holding period requirement. Most
of our employees, executive officers, directors or consultants
who purchased shares under a written compensatory plan or
contract may be entitled to rely on the resale provisions of
Rule 701, but all holders of Rule 701 shares are
required to wait until 90 days after the date of this
prospectus before selling their shares. However, substantially
all Rule 701 shares are subject to
lock-up
agreements as described below and under Underwriting
and will become eligible for sale at the expiration of those
agreements.
Lock-Up
Agreements
We, along with our officers and directors and most of our other
stockholders and optionholders, have agreed that, subject to
certain exceptions we and they will not offer, sell, contract to
sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly,
any shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or
exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of our common stock,
enter into a transaction that would have the same effect, or
enter into any swap, hedge or other arrangement that transfers,
in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of
ownership of our common stock, whether any of these transactions
are to be settled by delivery of our common stock or other
securities, in cash or otherwise, or publicly disclose the
intention to make any offer, sale, pledge or disposition, or to
enter into any transaction, swap, hedge or other arrangement,
without, in each case, the prior written consent of each of
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc., for a period of 180 days after the date of
this prospectus. However, in the event that either
(1) during the last 17 days of the
lock-up
period, we release earnings results or announce material news or
a material event relating to us or (2) prior to the
expiration of the
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up
period, then, in either case, the expiration of the
lock-up
will be extended until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings
results or the announcement of the material news or event, as
applicable, unless each of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC,
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. waives, in writing, such an
extension.
Registration
Rights
After 180 days following the completion of this offering
(subject to extension in certain circumstances), the holders of
21,176,533 shares of common stock will be entitled to
rights with respect to the registration of their shares under
the Securities Act, subject to the
lock-up
arrangement described above. Registration of these shares under
the Securities Act would result in the shares becoming freely
tradable without restriction under the Securities Act (except
for shares held by affiliates) immediately upon the
effectiveness of this registration. Any sales of securities by
these stockholders could have a material adverse effect on the
trading price of our common stock. See Description of
Capital Stock Registration Rights. None of the
registration rights described above are applicable to this
offering.
Equity
Incentive Plans
We intend to file with the SEC a registration statement under
the Securities Act covering the shares of our common stock
reserved for issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, our
2010 Equity Incentive Plan and our 2010 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Award Plan. The registration statement is
expected to be filed and become effective as soon as practicable
after the completion of this offering. Accordingly, shares
registered under the registration statement will be available
for sale in the open market following its effective date,
subject to the
180-day
lock-up
arrangement described above, if applicable.
110
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
FOR NON-U.S.
HOLDERS
The following is a general discussion of the material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and
disposition of our common stock to a
non-U.S. holder
that acquires our common stock pursuant to this offering. For
the purpose of this discussion, a
non-U.S. holder
is any beneficial owner of our common stock that, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, is not a partnership or
U.S. person. For purposes of this discussion, the term
U.S. person means:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S.;
|
|
|
|
a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation created
or organized under the laws of the U.S. or any political
subdivision thereof;
|
|
|
|
an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income
tax regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust (x) whose administration is subject to the primary
supervision of a U.S. court and which has one or more
U.S. persons who have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust or (y) which has in
effect a valid election to be treated a U.S. person.
|
If a partnership (or an entity or arrangement treated as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds our
common stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally
depend on the status of the partner and upon the activities of
the partnership. Accordingly, we urge partnerships that hold our
common stock and partners in such partnerships to consult their
tax advisors.
This discussion assumes that a
non-U.S. holder
will hold our common stock issued pursuant to this offering as a
capital asset (generally, property held for investment). This
discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal
income taxation that may be relevant in light of a
non-U.S. holders
special tax status or special tax situations. Certain former
citizens or residents of the U.S., life insurance companies,
tax-exempt organizations, dealers in securities or currency,
banks or other financial institutions and investors that hold
common stock as part of a hedge, straddle, conversion
transaction, synthetic security or other integrated investment
are among those categories of potential investors that are
subject to special rules not covered in this discussion. This
discussion does not address any tax consequences arising under
the laws of any state, local or
non-U.S. taxing
jurisdiction. Furthermore, the following discussion is based on
current provisions of the Code and Treasury Regulations and
administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as in
effect on the date hereof, and all of which are subject to
change, possibly with retroactive effect. Accordingly, we urge
each
non-U.S. holder
to consult a tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, state,
local and
non-U.S. income
and other tax consequences of acquiring, holding and disposing
of shares of our common stock.
Dividends
We have not paid any dividends on our common stock and we do not
plan to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. However, if
we do pay dividends on our common stock, those payments will
constitute dividends for U.S. tax purposes to the extent
paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as
determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. To the
extent those dividends exceed our current and accumulated
earnings and profits, the dividends will constitute a return of
capital and will first reduce a holders adjusted tax basis
in the common stock, but not below zero, and then will be
treated as gain from the sale of the common stock.
Dividends paid (out of earnings and profits) to a
non-U.S. holder
of common stock generally will be subject to
U.S. withholding tax either at a rate of 30% of the gross
amount of the dividend or such lower rate as may be specified by
an applicable tax treaty. To receive a reduced rate of
withholding under a tax treaty, a
non-U.S. holder
must provide us with an IRS
Form W-8BEN
or other appropriate version of
Form W-8
certifying qualification for the reduced rate.
111
Dividends received by a
non-U.S. holder
that are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business conducted by the
non-U.S. holder
(and, if required by an applicable tax treaty, that are
attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment) generally
are not subject to withholding tax, provided certain
certifications are met. Such effectively connected dividends,
net of certain deductions and credits, are taxed at the
graduated U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to
U.S. persons. To claim an exemption from withholding
because the dividends are effectively connected within a
U.S. trade or business of the
non-U.S. holder,
the
non-U.S. holder
must provide a properly executed IRS
Form W-8ECI,
or such successor form as the IRS designates prior to the
payment of dividends. In addition to the graduated tax described
above, dividends that are effectively connected with a
U.S. trade or business of a corporate
non-U.S. holder
may also be subject to a branch profits tax at a rate of 30% or
such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable tax treaty.
A
non-U.S. holder
of common stock may obtain a refund or credit of any excess
amounts withheld if an appropriate claim for refund is timely
filed with the IRS.
Gain on
Disposition of Common Stock
Subject to the discussion below under Backup Withholding
and Information Reporting, a
non-U.S. holder
generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or
withholding tax on any gain realized upon the sale or other
disposition of our common stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business of the
non-U.S. holder,
and, if an applicable tax treaty so requires, is attributable to
a U.S. permanent establishment maintained by such
non-U.S. holder;
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is an individual who is present in the U.S. for a period or
periods aggregating 183 days or more during the calendar
year in which the sale or disposition occurs and certain other
conditions are met; or
|
|
|
|
our common stock constitutes a U.S. real property interest
by reason of our status as a U.S. real property
holding corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes at any time within the shorter of the five-year period
preceding the disposition or the holders holding period
for our common stock. We believe that we are not currently, and
that we will not become, a U.S. real property holding
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
|
Unless an applicable tax treaty provides otherwise, gain
described in the first bullet point above will be subject to
U.S. federal income tax on a net basis at the graduated
U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to
U.S. persons and, in the case of
non-U.S. corporate
holders, a branch profits tax may also apply. Gain
described in the second bullet point above (which may be offset
by certain U.S. source capital losses) will be subject to a
flat 30% U.S. federal income tax or such lower rate as may
be specified by an applicable tax treaty.
If we were to become a U.S. real property holding
corporation at any time during the applicable period described
in the third bullet point above, any gain recognized on a
disposition of our common stock by a
non-U.S. holder
would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the
graduated U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to
U.S. persons if either (i) the
non-U.S. holder
owned (directly, indirectly or constructively) more than 5% of
our common stock during such applicable period or (ii) our
common stock were not regularly traded on an established
securities market (within the meaning of
Section 897(c)(3) of the Code) at any time during the
calendar year of the disposition. We believe that our stock will
be treated as so traded.
Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting
Generally, we must report annually to the IRS the amount of
dividends paid, the name and address of the recipient, and the
amount, if any, of tax withheld. A similar report is sent to the
non-U.S. holder.
Pursuant to
112
tax treaties or other agreements, the IRS may make its reports
available to tax authorities in the recipients country of
residence.
Payments of dividends made to a
non-U.S. holder
may be subject to backup withholding (currently at a rate of
28%), and the proceeds from the disposition of our common stock
may be subject to backup withholding and information reporting,
unless the
non-U.S. holder
establishes an exemption, for example, by properly certifying
its
non-U.S. status
on a
Form W-8BEN
or another appropriate version of
Form W-8.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, backup withholding may apply if
either we or our paying agent has actual knowledge, or reason to
know, that the beneficial owner is a U.S. person.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the
U.S. income tax liability of persons subject to backup
withholding will be reduced by the amount of tax withheld. If
withholding results in an overpayment of taxes, a refund may be
obtained, provided that the required information is timely
furnished to the IRS.
113
UNDERWRITERS
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement
dated ,
2010, we have agreed to sell to the underwriters named below,
for whom Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. are acting as representatives,
the following respective numbers of shares of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are
obligated to purchase all the shares of common stock in the
offering if any are purchased, other than those shares covered
by the over-allotment option described below. The underwriting
agreement also provides that if an underwriter defaults, the
purchase commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be
increased or the offering may be terminated.
We have granted to the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up to 1,500,000 additional shares at the
initial public offering price less the underwriting discounts
and commissions. The option may be exercised only to cover any
over-allotments of common stock. If any shares are purchased
pursuant to this option, the underwriters will purchase such
shares in approximately the same proportion as set forth in the
table above.
The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock
initially at the public offering price on the cover page of this
prospectus and to selling group members at that price less a
selling concession of $0.63 per share. After the initial public
offering, the representatives may change the public offering
price and concession and discount to broker/dealers.
The following table summarizes the compensation and estimated
expenses we will pay:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Without
|
|
With
|
|
Without
|
|
With
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions payable by us
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
10,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
12,075,000
|
|
Expenses payable by us
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
2,334,450
|
|
|
$
|
2,334,450
|
|
Qatalyst Partners LP is acting as our financial advisor in
connection with the offering. Qatalysts services consist
of (i) analyzing our business, condition and financial
position, (ii) preparing and implementing a plan for
identifying and selecting appropriate participants in the
underwriting syndicate, (iii) evaluating proposals that
were received from potential underwriters, (iv) negotiating
on our behalf the key terms of any contractual arrangements with
members of the underwriting syndicate, and (v) determining
various offering logistics. Qatalyst is not acting as an
underwriter and will not sell or offer to sell any securities
and will not identify, solicit or engage directly with potential
investors. In addition, Qatalyst will not underwrite or purchase
any of the offered securities or otherwise participate in any
such undertaking.
The underwriters have agreed to reimburse us for a portion of
our out-of-pocket expenses in connection with the offering in
the amount of $2.1 million, representing the fees we have
agreed to pay Qatalyst for acting as our financial advisor. In
addition, we have agreed to reimburse Qatalyst for its
out-of-pocket expenses in an amount not to exceed $50,000. The
underwriters will not reimburse us for the out-of-pocket
expenses which we have agreed to reimburse Qatalyst.
The underwriters have informed us that they do not expect sales
to accounts over which the underwriters have discretionary
authority to exceed 5% of the shares of common stock being
offered.
We, along with our officers and directors and most of our other
stockholders and optionholders, have agreed that, subject to
certain exceptions we and they will not offer, sell, contract to
sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of,
114
directly or indirectly, any shares of our common stock or
securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for
any shares of our common stock, enter into a transaction that
would have the same effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or
other arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of
the economic consequences of ownership of our common stock,
whether any of these transactions are to be settled by delivery
of our common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise,
or publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, sale,
pledge or disposition, or to enter into any transaction, swap,
hedge or other arrangement, without, in each case, the prior
written consent of each of the representatives for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus. However, in the
event that either (1) during the last 17 days of the
lock-up
period, we release earnings results or announce material news or
a material event relating to us or (2) prior to the
expiration of the
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up
period, then in either case the expiration of the
lock-up
will be extended until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings
results or the announcement of the material news or event, as
applicable, unless each of the representatives waives, in
writing, such an extension.
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against liabilities
under the Securities Act, or contribute to payments that the
underwriters may be required to make in that respect.
Our common stock has been approved for listing on The NASDAQ
Global Select Market under the symbol QNST.
Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates may
have from time to time performed and may in the future perform
various financial advisory, commercial banking and investment
banking services for us in the ordinary course of business, for
which they received or will receive customary fees. In addition,
affiliates of the representatives are lenders under our bank
credit facility.
Prior to the offering, there has been no market for our common
stock. The initial public offering price was determined by
negotiation between us and the underwriters and does not
necessarily reflect the market price of the common stock
following the offering. The principal factors that were
considered in determining the initial public offering price
included:
|
|
|
|
|
the information presented in this prospectus and otherwise
available to the underwriters;
|
|
|
|
the history of and the prospects for the industry in which we
compete;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our management;
|
|
|
|
the prospects for our future earnings;
|
|
|
|
the present state of our development and our current financial
condition;
|
|
|
|
the recent market prices of, and the demand for, publicly-traded
common stock of generally comparable companies; and
|
|
|
|
the general condition of the securities markets at the time of
the offering.
|
We offer no assurances that the initial public offering price
will correspond to the price at which our common stock will
trade in the public market subsequent to the offering or that an
active trading market for the common stock will develop and
continue after the offering.
In connection with the offering, the underwriters may engage in
stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate
covering transactions, penalty bids and passive market making in
accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum.
|
|
|
|
Over-allotment involves sales by the underwriters of shares in
excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to
purchase, which creates a syndicate short position. The short
position may be either a covered short position or a naked short
position. In a covered short position, the number of shares
over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the number
of shares that they may purchase in the over-allotment option.
In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is
greater than
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares in the over-allotment option. The
underwriters may close out any covered short position by either
exercising their over-allotment option
and/or
purchasing shares in the open market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of shares to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through
the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares
than could be covered by the over-allotment option, a naked
short position, the position can only be closed out by buying
shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely
to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there could
be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open
market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who
purchase in the offering.
|
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common stock
originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions.
|
|
|
|
In passive market making, market makers in the common stock who
are underwriters or prospective underwriters may, subject to
limitations, make bids for or purchases of our common stock
until the time, if any, at which a stabilizing bid is made.
|
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of the common stock. As a result
the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may
be effected on The NASDAQ Global Market or otherwise and, if
commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the
websites maintained by one or more of the underwriters, or
selling group members, if any, participating in this offering,
and one or more of the underwriters participating in this
offering may distribute prospectuses electronically. The
representatives may agree to allocate a number of shares to
underwriters and selling group members for sale to their online
brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be
allocated by the underwriters and selling group members that
will make Internet distributions on the same basis as other
allocations.
Selling
Restrictions
Notice
to Prospective Investors in the European Economic Area / United
Kingdom
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive, each referred to
as a Relevant Member State, from and including the date on which
the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member
State (the Relevant Implementation Date), an offer to the public
of any shares which are the subject of the offering contemplated
by this prospectus may not be made in that Relevant Member
State, except that an offer to the public in that Relevant
Member State of any shares may be made at any time under the
following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive, if they
have been implemented in that Relevant Member State with effect
from and including the Relevant Implementation Date:
(a) to legal entities which are authorised or regulated to
operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorised or
regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in
securities;
(b) to any legal entity which has two or more of
(1) an average of at least 250 employees during the
last financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than
43,000,000 and (3) an annual net turnover of more
than 50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or
consolidated accounts;
(c) by the underwriters to fewer than 100 natural or legal
persons (other than qualified investors as defined
in the Prospectus Directive) subject to obtaining the prior
consent of the underwriter representatives for any such
offer; or
116
(d) in any other circumstances falling within
Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive, provided that no
such offer of shares shall result in a requirement for the
publication by us or any underwriter of a prospectus pursuant to
Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.
Any person making or intending to make any offer within the
European Economic Area of the shares which are the subject of
the offering contemplated in this prospectus should only do so
in circumstances in which no obligation arises for us or any of
the book-running managers to produce a prospectus for such
offer. Neither we nor the book-running managers have authorised,
nor do we or they authorize, the making of any offer of shares
through any financial intermediary, other than offers made by
the underwriters which constitute the final offering of shares
contemplated in this prospectus.
For the purposes of this provision, and the buyers
representation below, the expression an offer to the
public in relation to any shares in any Relevant Member
State means the communication in any form and by any means of
sufficient information on the terms of the offer and any shares
to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase
any shares, as the same may be varied in that Relevant Member
State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in
that Relevant Member State and the expression Prospectus
Directive means Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any
relevant implementing measure in each Relevant Member State.
Buyers
Representation
Each person in a Relevant Member State who receives any
communication in respect of, or who acquires any shares which
are the subject of the offering contemplated by this prospectus
under, the offers contemplated in this prospectus will be deemed
to have represented, warranted and agreed to and with each
underwriter and us that:
(a) it is a qualified investor within the meaning of the
law in that Relevant Member State implementing
Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive; and
(b) in the case of any shares acquired by it as a financial
intermediary, as that term is used in Article 3(2) of the
Prospectus Directive, (i) the shares acquired by it in the
offering have not been acquired on behalf of, nor have they been
acquired with a view to their offer or resale to, persons in any
Relevant Member State other than qualified investors
as defined in the Prospectus Directive, or in circumstances in
which the prior consent of the underwriter representatives has
been given to the offer or resale; or (ii) where shares
have been acquired by it on behalf of persons in any Relevant
Member State other than qualified investors, the offer of those
shares to it is not treated under the Prospectus Directive as
having been made to such persons.
Notice
to Prospective Investors in Switzerland
This document, as well as any other material relating to the
shares which are the subject of the offering contemplated by
this prospectus, do not constitute an issue prospectus pursuant
to Article 652a
and/or 1156
of the Swiss Code of Obligations. The shares will not be listed
on the SIX Swiss Exchange and, therefore, the documents relating
to the shares, including, but not limited to, this document, do
not claim to comply with the disclosure standards of the listing
rules of SIX Swiss Exchange and corresponding prospectus schemes
annexed to the listing rules of the SIX Swiss Exchange.
The shares are being offered in Switzerland by way of a private
placement, i.e., to a small number of selected investors only,
without any public offer and only to investors who do not
purchase shares with the intention to distribute them to the
public. The investors will be individually approached by us from
time to time. This document, as well as any other material
relating to the shares, is personal and confidential and does
not constitute an offer to any other person. This document may
only be used by those investors to whom it has been handed out
in connection with the offering described herein and may neither
directly nor indirectly be distributed or made available to
other persons without our express consent. It may not be used in
connection with any other offer and shall in particular not be
copied
and/or
distributed to the public in (or from) Switzerland.
117
Notice
to Prospective Investors in the Dubai International Financial
Centre
This document relates to an exempt offer in accordance with the
Offered Securities Rules of the Dubai Financial Services
Authority. This document is intended for distribution only to
persons of a type specified in those rules. It must not be
delivered to, or relied on by, any other person. The Dubai
Financial Services Authority has no responsibility for reviewing
or verifying any documents in connection with exempt offers. The
Dubai Financial Services Authority has not approved this
document nor taken steps to verify the information set out in
it, and has no responsibility for it. The shares which are the
subject of the offering contemplated by this prospectus may be
illiquid
and/or
subject to restrictions on their resale. Prospective purchasers
of the shares offered should conduct their own due diligence on
the shares. If you do not understand the contents of this
document, you should consult an authorised financial adviser.
118
LEGAL
MATTERS
Certain legal matters with respect to the legality of the
issuance of the shares of common stock offered by us by this
prospectus will be passed upon for us by Cooley Godward Kronish
LLP, San Francisco, California. GC&H Investments LLC,
an investment fund affiliated with Cooley Godward Kronish LLP,
owns shares of our convertible preferred stock, which will
convert into an aggregate of 36,671 shares of our common
stock upon the completion of this offering. The underwriters are
being represented by Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Menlo
Park, California, in connection with the offering.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2008
and 2009, and for each of the three years in the period ended
June 30, 2009, included in this prospectus have been so
included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on
the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to
this offering of our common stock. This prospectus, which
constitutes a part of the registration statement, does not
contain all of the information set forth in the registration
statement, some items of which are contained in exhibits to the
registration statement as permitted by the rules and regulations
of the SEC. For further information with respect to us and our
common stock offered by this prospectus, we refer you to the
registration statement, including the exhibits and the
consolidated financial statements and notes filed as a part of
the registration statement. Statements contained in this
prospectus as to the contents of any contract or any other
document referred to are not necessarily complete, and in each
instance, we refer you to the copy of the contract or other
document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. Each
of these statements is qualified in all respects by this
reference.
The exhibits to the registration statement should be referenced
for the complete contents of these contracts and documents. You
may obtain copies of this information by mail from the Public
Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E.,
Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed
rates. You may obtain information on the operation of the public
reference rooms by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains an Internet website that contains
reports, proxy statements and other information about issuers,
like us, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of
that website is www.sec.gov.
Upon the closing of this offering, we will be subject to the
information reporting requirements of the Securities Act and we
will file reports, proxy statements and other information with
the SEC. These reports, proxy statements and other information
will be available for inspection and copying at the public
reference room and website of the SEC referred to above. We also
maintain a website at www.quinstreet.com, at which you may
access these materials free of charge as soon as reasonably
practicable after they are electronically filed with, or
furnished to, the SEC. The information contained in, or that can
be accessed through, our website is not part of this prospectus.
119
QUINSTREET,
INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
of QuinStreet, Inc.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of operations, of
convertible preferred stock, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income, and of cash flows present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of QuinStreet, Inc.
and its subsidiaries at June 30, 2008 and 2009, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended June 30, 2009 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the accompanying
financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related financial statements. These
financial statements and financial statements schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements and financial statement schedule are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
As discussed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts
for uncertainty in income taxes in 2007.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
San Jose, California
November 19, 2009, except for Note 14
to the financial statements,
as to which the date is
January 14, 2010
F-2
QUINSTREET,
INC.
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity at
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
24,953
|
|
|
$
|
25,182
|
|
|
$
|
34,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
25,281
|
|
|
|
33,283
|
|
|
|
40,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
5,543
|
|
|
|
5,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
1,713
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
6,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
56,987
|
|
|
|
65,236
|
|
|
|
86,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
5,725
|
|
|
|
4,741
|
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
80,468
|
|
|
|
106,744
|
|
|
|
139,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
34,826
|
|
|
|
33,990
|
|
|
|
49,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, noncurrent
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, noncurrent
|
|
|
1,493
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
1,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
179,746
|
|
|
$
|
212,878
|
|
|
$
|
281,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
10,042
|
|
|
$
|
13,408
|
|
|
$
|
15,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
19,571
|
|
|
|
21,794
|
|
|
|
23,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
9,489
|
|
|
|
12,890
|
|
|
|
16,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
39,965
|
|
|
|
48,810
|
|
|
|
55,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue, noncurrent
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt, noncurrent
|
|
|
42,165
|
|
|
|
44,350
|
|
|
|
89,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities, noncurrent
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
2,309
|
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
86,032
|
|
|
|
96,289
|
|
|
|
147,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock: $0.001 par value;
35,500,000 shares authorized; 21,176,533 shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and 2009 and
December 31, 2009; liquidation value of $69,564 and $71,110
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively;
no shares issued and outstanding pro forma
|
|
|
43,403
|
|
|
|
43,403
|
|
|
|
43,403
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: $0.001 par value; 50,500,000 shares authorized;
15,243,284, 15,413,000 and 15,913,516 shares issued, and
13,308,907, 13,315,348 and 13,736,064 shares outstanding at
June 30, 2008 and 2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively;
37,090,049 shares issued pro forma and 34,912,597 shares
outstanding pro forma
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
13,683
|
|
|
|
20,634
|
|
|
|
30,279
|
|
|
|
73,661
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost (1,934,377, 2,097,652, 2,177,452 shares
at June 30, 2008 and 2009 and December 31, 2009,
respectively)
|
|
|
(5,727
|
)
|
|
|
(7,064
|
)
|
|
|
(7,779
|
)
|
|
|
(7,779
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
42,306
|
|
|
|
59,580
|
|
|
|
68,503
|
|
|
|
68,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
50,311
|
|
|
|
73,186
|
|
|
|
91,032
|
|
|
|
134,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, convertible preferred stock and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
179,746
|
|
|
$
|
212,878
|
|
|
$
|
281,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-3
QUINSTREET,
INC.
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
167,370
|
|
|
$
|
192,030
|
|
|
$
|
260,527
|
|
|
$
|
122,913
|
|
|
$
|
155,515
|
|
Cost of revenue(1)
|
|
|
108,945
|
|
|
|
130,869
|
|
|
|
181,593
|
|
|
|
88,250
|
|
|
|
111,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
58,425
|
|
|
|
61,161
|
|
|
|
78,934
|
|
|
|
34,663
|
|
|
|
43,911
|
|
Operating expenses:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
14,094
|
|
|
|
14,051
|
|
|
|
14,887
|
|
|
|
7,480
|
|
|
|
9,209
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
|
|
12,409
|
|
|
|
16,154
|
|
|
|
8,423
|
|
|
|
7,615
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
13,371
|
|
|
|
13,172
|
|
|
|
6,907
|
|
|
|
9,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
24,404
|
|
|
|
21,330
|
|
|
|
34,721
|
|
|
|
11,853
|
|
|
|
17,443
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(3,544
|
)
|
|
|
(1,870
|
)
|
|
|
(1,629
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
25,438
|
|
|
|
21,743
|
|
|
|
31,183
|
|
|
|
9,920
|
|
|
|
16,116
|
|
Provision for taxes
|
|
|
(9,828
|
)
|
|
|
(8,876
|
)
|
|
|
(13,909
|
)
|
|
|
(4,266
|
)
|
|
|
(7,193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,610
|
|
|
$
|
12,867
|
|
|
$
|
17,274
|
|
|
$
|
5,654
|
|
|
$
|
8,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
3,666
|
|
|
$
|
5,399
|
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
$
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
5,166
|
|
|
$
|
4,026
|
|
|
$
|
5,798
|
|
|
$
|
1,672
|
|
|
$
|
3,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing net income per share
attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
12,789
|
|
|
|
13,104
|
|
|
|
13,294
|
|
|
|
13,282
|
|
|
|
13,463
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
15,263
|
|
|
|
15,325
|
|
|
|
14,971
|
|
|
|
15,103
|
|
|
|
16,169
|
|
Pro forma net income per share attributable to common
stockholders (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares used in computing net income
per share attributable to common stockholders (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,640
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Cost of revenue and operating expenses for the
years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, and for the six
months ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 (unaudited),
include stock-based compensation expense as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,916
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
1,490
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
3,378
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
QUINSTREET,
INC.
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006
|
|
|
21,176,533
|
|
|
$
|
43,286
|
|
|
|
|
13,969,057
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
(1,375,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(121
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,855
|
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,651
|
|
|
$
|
18,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options issued in connection with business combination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,610
|
|
|
|
15,610
|
|
|
$
|
15,610
|
|
Unrealized gain on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007
|
|
|
21,176,533
|
|
|
$
|
43,403
|
|
|
|
|
14,350,087
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
(1,375,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(121
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,180
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
31,144
|
|
|
$
|
37,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
893,197
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(558,730
|
)
|
|
|
(5,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,705
|
)
|
|
|
(1,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,867
|
|
|
|
12,867
|
|
|
$
|
12,867
|
|
Unrealized gain on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
21,176,533
|
|
|
$
|
43,403
|
|
|
|
|
15,243,284
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
(1,934,377
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,727
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,683
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
42,306
|
|
|
$
|
50,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163,275
|
)
|
|
|
(1,337
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,337
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,274
|
|
|
|
17,274
|
|
|
$
|
17,274
|
|
Unrealized gain on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
21,176,533
|
|
|
$
|
43,403
|
|
|
|
|
15,413,000
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
(2,097,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,064
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,634
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
59,580
|
|
|
$
|
73,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,516
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79,800
|
)
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,923
|
|
|
|
8,923
|
|
|
$
|
8,923
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
|
21,176,533
|
|
|
$
|
43,403
|
|
|
|
|
15,913,516
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
(2,177,452
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,779
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,279
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
68,503
|
|
|
$
|
91,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
QUINSTREET,
INC.
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,610
|
|
|
$
|
12,867
|
|
|
$
|
17,274
|
|
|
$
|
5,654
|
|
|
$
|
8,923
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
11,727
|
|
|
|
15,978
|
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
|
|
8,603
|
|
Net realized (gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
Provision for sales returns
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
6,173
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
7,093
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
(1,707
|
)
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
(1,372
|
)
|
Accretion of acquisition-related notes payable
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
(921
|
)
|
|
|
(9,042
|
)
|
|
|
(4,049
|
)
|
|
|
(4,076
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(656
|
)
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
(4,352
|
)
|
Other assets, noncurrent
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
(710
|
)
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
(796
|
)
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
(3,772
|
)
|
|
|
(4,081
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
3,440
|
|
|
|
(4,977
|
)
|
|
|
3,359
|
|
|
|
3,072
|
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(831
|
)
|
|
|
8,020
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
(7,988
|
)
|
|
|
752
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(2,893
|
)
|
|
|
(954
|
)
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
(828
|
)
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(1,497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
Other liabilities, noncurrent
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
25,197
|
|
|
|
24,751
|
|
|
|
32,570
|
|
|
|
9,371
|
|
|
|
16,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(2,030
|
)
|
|
|
(2,177
|
)
|
|
|
(1,347
|
)
|
|
|
(821
|
)
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
Business acquisitions, net of notes payable and cash acquired
|
|
|
(11,856
|
)
|
|
|
(63,244
|
)
|
|
|
(27,932
|
)
|
|
|
(14,529
|
)
|
|
|
(45,952
|
)
|
Internal software development costs
|
|
|
(1,493
|
)
|
|
|
(1,378
|
)
|
|
|
(1,060
|
)
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
(647
|
)
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(40,860
|
)
|
|
|
(11,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities
|
|
|
29,905
|
|
|
|
29,172
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(26,365
|
)
|
|
|
(49,248
|
)
|
|
|
(27,326
|
)
|
|
|
(12,995
|
)
|
|
|
(47,576
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
Proceeds from bank debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
8,607
|
|
|
|
8,607
|
|
|
|
43,300
|
|
Principal payments on bank debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
Principal payments on acquisition-related notes payable
|
|
|
(3,932
|
)
|
|
|
(4,920
|
)
|
|
|
(9,560
|
)
|
|
|
(6,053
|
)
|
|
|
(2,843
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
1,707
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,606
|
)
|
|
|
(1,337
|
)
|
|
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(2,803
|
)
|
|
|
22,756
|
|
|
|
(5,012
|
)
|
|
|
1,995
|
|
|
|
40,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,828
|
)
|
|
|
(1,812
|
)
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
(1,622
|
)
|
|
|
8,957
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
30,593
|
|
|
|
26,765
|
|
|
|
24,953
|
|
|
|
24,953
|
|
|
|
25,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
26,765
|
|
|
$
|
24,953
|
|
|
$
|
25,182
|
|
|
$
|
23,331
|
|
|
$
|
34,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
2,269
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
Cash paid for taxes
|
|
|
10,376
|
|
|
|
8,473
|
|
|
|
20,354
|
|
|
|
10,442
|
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options issued in connection with business acquisitions
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable issued in connection with business acquisitions
|
|
|
4,047
|
|
|
|
16,910
|
|
|
|
8,151
|
|
|
|
5,568
|
|
|
|
10,484
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-6
QUINSTREET,
INC.
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
QuinStreet, Inc. (the Company) is an online media
and marketing company. The Company was incorporated in
California on April 16, 1999 and reincorporated in Delaware
on December 31, 2009. The Company provides vertically
oriented customer acquisition programs for its clients. The
Company also provides hosted solutions for direct selling
companies. The corporate headquarters are located in Foster
City, California, with offices in Arkansas, Colorado,
Connecticut, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, India and the United Kingdom.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Unaudited
Interim Financial Information
The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2009, the consolidated statements of
operations and of cash flows for the six months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009 and of convertible preferred
stock, stockholders equity and comprehensive income for
the six months ended December 31, 2009 are unaudited. The
unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared on the
same basis as the annual financial statements and, in the
opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include
only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly
the Companys financial condition and results of operations
and cash flows for the six months ended December 31, 2008
and 2009. The financial data and other information disclosed in
these notes to the consolidated financial statements related to
the six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 are
unaudited. The results of operations for the six months ended
December 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for fiscal year 2010 or for any other
interim period or for any other future year.
Pro
Forma Statement of Stockholders Equity
(unaudited)
Upon the consummation of a qualifying initial public offering,
all of the outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock
automatically convert into common stock. The December 31,
2009 unaudited pro forma balance sheet data has been prepared
assuming the conversion of the convertible preferred stock
outstanding into 21,176,533 shares of common stock.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company derives its revenue from two sources: Direct
Marketing Services (DMS) and Direct Selling Services
(DSS). DMS revenue, which constituted 95%, 98% and
99% of fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 respectively, is derived
primarily from fees which are earned through the delivery of
qualified leads or clicks. The Company recognizes revenue when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is
reasonably assured. Delivery is deemed to have
F-7
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
occurred at the time a qualified lead or click is delivered to
the customer provided that no significant obligations remain.
From time to time, the Company may agree to credit certain leads
or clicks if they fail to meet the contractual or other
guidelines of a particular client. The Company has established a
sales reserve based on historical experience. To date, such
credits have been immaterial and within managements
expectations.
For a portion of its revenue, the Company has agreements with
providers of online media or traffic (Publishers)
used in the generation of leads or clicks. The Company receives
a fee from its clients and pays a fee to Publishers either on a
cost per lead, cost per click or cost per thousand impressions
basis. The Company is the primary obligor in the transaction. As
a result, the fees paid by the Companys clients are
recognized as revenue and the fees paid to its Publishers are
included in cost of revenue.
DSS revenue, which constituted 5%, 2% and 1% of fiscal years
2007, 2008 and 2009 revenue, respectively, is comprised of
(i) set-up
and professional services fees and (ii) usage and hosting
fees. Set-up
and professional service fees that do not provide stand-alone
value to a client are recognized over the contractual term of
the agreement or the expected client relationship period,
whichever is longer, effective when the application reaches the
go-live date. The Company defines the
go-live date as the date when the application enters
into a production environment or all essential functionalities
have been delivered. Usage and hosting fees are recognized on a
monthly basis as earned.
Deferred revenue consists of billings or payments received in
advance of reaching all the above revenue recognition criteria.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of
cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Cash and cash
equivalents are deposited with financial institutions that
management believes are creditworthy. The deposits exceed
federally insured amounts. To date, the Company has not
experienced any losses of its deposits of cash and cash
equivalents.
The Companys accounts receivable are derived from clients
located principally in the United States, and to a lesser
extent, Europe and Canada. The Company performs ongoing credit
evaluation of its clients, does not require collateral, and
maintains allowances for potential credit losses on client
accounts when deemed necessary. To date, such losses have been
within managements expectations.
Clients over 10% of total revenue, all of which were from our
DMS segment, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Client A
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Client B
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Client C
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments consist principally of
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable, acquisition-related notes payable, term loan and
revolving credit facility. The fair value of the Companys
cash equivalents is determined based on quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets. The recorded values of the
Companys accounts receivable and accounts payable
approximate their
F-8
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
current fair values due to the relatively short-term nature of
these accounts. The fair value of acquisition-related notes
payable approximates their recorded amounts at June 30,
2009 as the interest rates on similar financing arrangements
available to the Company at June 30, 2009 approximates the
interest rates implied when these acquisition-related notes
payable were originally issued and recorded. The Company
believes that the fair values of the term loan and revolving
credit facility, as of June 30, 2009, approximate their
recorded amounts as the interest rates on these instruments are
variable and are primarily based on market rate interest.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or
less at the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents.
Cash equivalents consist primarily of money market funds and
time deposits with original maturities of three months or less.
Cash equivalents amounted to $9,395 and $17,091 at June 30,
2008 and 2009, respectively, and $19,323 at December 31,
2009 (unaudited).
Marketable
Securities
Highly liquid investments with maturities greater than three
months at the date of purchase are classified as marketable
securities. The Companys marketable securities have been
classified and accounted for as
available-for-sale.
Management determines the appropriate classification of its
investments at the time of purchase and reevaluates the
available-for-sale
designation as of each balance sheet date. These investments are
carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of
tax, and are reported as a component of stockholders
equity. The cost of securities sold is based upon the specific
identification method. The Company did not have any marketable
securities at June 30, 2009 and at December 31, 2009
(unaudited). At June 30, 2008, marketable securities
consisted of corporate bonds from three issuers with a fair
value of $2,302.
Restricted
Cash
At June 30, 2008 and 2009, the Company had $731 and $20,
respectively, of cash restricted from withdrawal and held by a
bank in certificate of deposits as collateral for a credit
facility.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization, and are depreciated on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the
assets.
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
3 years
|
Software
|
|
3 years
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
3 to 5 years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful lives of
the improvements
|
Internal
Software Development Costs
The Company incurs costs to develop software for internal use.
The Company expenses all costs that relate to the planning and
post-implementation phases of development as product development
expense. Costs incurred in the development phase are capitalized
and amortized over the products estimated useful life if
the product is expected to have a useful life beyond six months.
Costs associated with repair or maintenance of existing sites or
the developments of website content are included in cost of
revenue in the accompanying statements of operations. The
Companys policy is to amortize capitalized internal
software development costs on a product-by-product basis using
the straight-line method over the estimated economic life of the
application, which is generally two years. The Company
capitalized $1,493, $1,378 and $1,060 in fiscal years
F-9
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. Amortization of internal
software development costs is reflected in cost of revenue.
Goodwill
Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level on
an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable.
Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgment,
including the identification of reporting units, assigning
assets and liabilities to reporting units, assigning goodwill to
reporting units, and determining the fair value of each
reporting unit. Significant judgments required to estimate the
fair value of reporting units include estimating future cash
flows, and determining appropriate discount rates, growth rates
and other assumptions. Changes in these estimates and
assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair
value for each reporting unit which could trigger impairment.
The Company determined that DMS and DSS constitute two separate
reporting units. The Company completed its annual goodwill
impairment reviews at June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and
concluded that goodwill was not impaired.
Long-Lived
Assets
The Company evaluates long-lived assets, such as property and
equipment and purchased intangible assets with finite lives, for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. The
Company assesses the fair value of the assets based on the
undiscounted future cash flow the assets are expected to
generate and recognizes an impairment loss when estimated
undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use
of the asset plus net proceeds expected from disposition of the
asset, if any, are less than the carrying value of the asset.
When the Company identifies an impairment, it reduces the
carrying amount of the asset to its estimated fair value based
on a discounted cash flow approach or, when available and
appropriate, to comparable market values. There were no
impairments recorded in fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 related
to the Companys long-lived assets.
Advertising
Costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as they are incurred.
Advertising expenses for fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 were
$54, $67 and $185, respectively.
Income
Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and
liability approach to record deferred taxes. The Companys
deferred income tax assets represent temporary differences
between the financial statement carrying amount and the tax
basis of existing assets and liabilities that will result in
deductible amounts in future years, including net operating loss
carry forwards. Based on estimates, the carrying value of the
Companys net deferred tax assets assumes that it is more
likely than not that the Company will be able to generate
sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions.
The Companys judgments regarding future profitability may
change due to future market conditions, changes in U.S. or
international tax laws and other factors.
On July 1, 2007, the Company adopted the authoritative
accounting guidance prescribing a threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The
guidance also provides for de-recognition of tax benefits,
classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The
guidance utilizes a two-step approach for evaluating uncertain
tax positions. Step one, Recognition, requires a company
F-10
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that
a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon
audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation
processes, if any. If a tax position is not considered
more likely than not to be sustained then no
benefits of the position are to be recognized. Step two,
Measurement, is based on the largest amount of benefit, which is
more likely than not to be realized on ultimate settlement.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The functional currency for the majority of the Companys
foreign subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. For those
subsidiaries, assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currency are remeasured into U.S. dollars at current
exchange rates for monetary assets and liabilities and
historical exchange rates for nonmonetary assets and
liabilities. Net revenue, cost of revenue and expenses are
generally remeasured at average exchange rates in effect during
each period. Gains and losses from foreign currency
remeasurement are included in net earnings. Certain foreign
subsidiaries designate the local currency as their functional
currency. For those subsidiaries, the assets and liabilities are
translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at
the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated
at average exchange rates for the period. The foreign currency
translation adjustments are included in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of
stockholders equity.
Foreign currency transaction gains or losses are recorded in
other income (expense), net. Foreign currency transaction losses
were $97 for fiscal year 2007. Foreign currency transaction
gains were $101 for fiscal year 2008. Foreign currency
transaction losses were $254 for fiscal year 2009.
Comprehensive
Income
Comprehensive income consists of two components, net income and
other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income
(loss) refers to revenue, expenses, gains, and losses that under
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles are recorded
as an element of stockholders equity but are excluded from
net income. The Companys other comprehensive income (loss)
consists of foreign currency translation adjustments from those
subsidiaries not using the U.S. dollar as their functional
currency and unrealized gains and losses on marketable
securities categorized as
available-for-sale.
The Company has disclosed comprehensive income as a component of
stockholders equity.
Loss
Contingencies
The Company is subject to the possibility of various loss
contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business.
Management considers the likelihood of loss or impairment of an
asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as its ability
to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss
contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it
is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has
been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably
estimated. The Company regularly evaluates current information
available to its management to determine whether such accruals
should be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.
From time to time, the Company is involved in disputes,
litigation and other legal actions. The Company records a charge
equal to at least the minimum estimated liability for a loss
contingency only when both of the following conditions are met:
(i) information available prior to issuance of the
financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset
had been impaired or a liability had been incurred at the date
of the financial statements, and (ii) the range of loss can
be reasonably estimated. The actual liability in any such
matters may be materially different from the Companys
estimates, which could result in the need to adjust the
liability and record additional expenses.
F-11
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Stock-Based
Compensation
The Company records stock-based compensation expense for
employee stock options granted or modified on or after
July 1, 2006 based on estimated fair values for these stock
options. The Company continues to account for stock options
granted to employees prior to July 1, 2006 based on the
intrinsic value of those stock options.
Fair values of share-based payment awards are determined on the
date of grant using an option-pricing model. The Company has
selected the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the
fair value of its stock options awards to employees. In applying
the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the Companys
determination of fair value of the share-based payment award on
the date of grant is affected by the Companys estimated
fair value of common shares, as well as assumptions regarding a
number of highly complex and subjective variables. These
variables include, but are not limited to, the Companys
expected stock price volatility over the term of the stock
options and the employees actual and projected stock
option exercise and pre-vesting employment termination behaviors.
For awards with graded vesting, the Company recognizes
stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service
period using the straight-line method, based on awards
ultimately expected to vest. The Company estimates future
forfeitures at the date of grant and revises the estimates, if
necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ
from those estimates.
See Note 10 for further information.
Segment
Reporting
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise
about which separate financial information is available that is
evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or
decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and
in assessing performance. The Companys chief operating
decision maker is its chief executive officer. The
Companys chief executive officer reviews financial
information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by
information about operating segments, including net sales and
operating income before depreciation, amortization and
stock-based compensation expense.
The Company determined its operating segments to be DMS, which
derives substantially all of its revenue from fees earned
through the delivery of qualified leads and paid clicks, and
DSS, which derives substantially all of its revenue from the
sale of direct selling services through a hosted solution. The
Companys reportable operating segments consist of DMS and
DSS. The accounting policies of the two reportable operating
segments are the same as those described in Note 1, Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies.
The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments
based on net sales and operating income before depreciation,
amortization and stock-based compensation expense.
F-12
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
The Company does not allocate most of its assets, as well as its
depreciation and amortization expense, stock-based compensation
expense, interest income, interest expense and income tax
expense by segment. Accordingly, the Company does not report
such information.
Summarized information by segment was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Net revenue by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DMS
|
|
$
|
159,744
|
|
|
$
|
188,429
|
|
|
$
|
257,420
|
|
|
|
121,283
|
|
|
|
154,330
|
|
DSS
|
|
|
7,626
|
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
3,107
|
|
|
|
1,630
|
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
167,370
|
|
|
$
|
192,030
|
|
|
$
|
260,527
|
|
|
$
|
122,913
|
|
|
$
|
155,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income before depreciation, amortization and
stock-based compensation expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DMS
|
|
|
31,611
|
|
|
|
34,740
|
|
|
|
55,251
|
|
|
|
22,329
|
|
|
|
32,428
|
|
DSS
|
|
|
4,501
|
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income before depreciation, amortization
and stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
36,112
|
|
|
|
36,279
|
|
|
|
56,872
|
|
|
|
23,114
|
|
|
|
33,139
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(9,637
|
)
|
|
|
(11,727
|
)
|
|
|
(15,978
|
)
|
|
|
(8,351
|
)
|
|
|
(8,603
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
(2,071
|
)
|
|
|
(3,222
|
)
|
|
|
(6,173
|
)
|
|
|
(2,910
|
)
|
|
|
(7,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
24,404
|
|
|
$
|
21,330
|
|
|
$
|
34,721
|
|
|
$
|
11,853
|
|
|
$
|
17,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables set forth net revenue and long-lived assets
by geographic area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
167,141
|
|
|
$
|
191,654
|
|
|
$
|
260,206
|
|
|
$
|
122,729
|
|
|
$
|
154,990
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
167,370
|
|
|
$
|
192,030
|
|
|
$
|
260,527
|
|
|
$
|
122,913
|
|
|
$
|
155,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
177,854
|
|
|
$
|
211,337
|
|
|
$
|
280,630
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
1,224
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
179,746
|
|
|
$
|
212,878
|
|
|
$
|
281,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
5,451
|
|
|
$
|
4,485
|
|
|
$
|
4,594
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
5,725
|
|
|
$
|
4,741
|
|
|
$
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued a new accounting standard that changes
the accounting for business combinations, including the
measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a
business combination, the recognition of contingent
consideration, the accounting for pre-acquisition gain and loss
contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process
research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related
restructuring cost accruals, the treatment of
acquisition-related transaction costs and the recognition of
changes in the acquirers income tax valuation allowance.
The new standard applies prospectively to business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of
the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008, and to changes in valuation allowances
for deferred tax assets and acquired income tax uncertainties
arising from past business combinations. The adoption of the new
standard on July 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on
the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure
of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued. In particular, the new standard
sets forth (i) the period after the balance sheet date
during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate
events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition
or disclosure in the financial statements; (ii) the
circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or
transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its
financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an
entity should make about events or transactions that occurred
after the balance sheet date. The Company applied the
requirement of this standard effective June 30, 2009 and
included additional disclosures in the notes to the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
provides for a codification of accounting standards to be the
authoritative source of generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC
under federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative
GAAP for SEC registrants. The Company adopted the provisions of
the authoritative accounting guidance for the interim reporting
period ended December 31, 2009. The adoption did not have a
material effect on the Companys consolidated results of
operations or financial condition.
In October 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
changes the accounting for arrangements with multiple
deliverables. Specifically, the new standard requires an entity
to allocate
F-14
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
arrangement consideration at the inception of an arrangement to
all of its deliverables based on their relative selling prices.
In addition, the new standard eliminates the use of the residual
method of allocation and requires the relative-selling-price
method in all circumstances in which an entity recognizes
revenue for an arrangement with multiple deliverables. In
October 2009, the FASB also issued a new accounting standard
that changes revenue recognition for tangible products
containing software and hardware elements. Specifically, if
certain requirements are met, revenue arrangements that contain
tangible products with software elements that are essential to
the functionality of the products are scoped out of the existing
software revenue recognition accounting guidance and will be
accounted for under the multiple-element arrangements revenue
recognition guidance discussed above. Both standards will be
effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal year
2011. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not
anticipate the adoption of these standards to have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
|
|
3.
|
Revision
of prior period financial statements
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
The Company licenses software from a third-party to automate the
administration of its employee equity programs and calculate its
stock-based compensation expense. During the first quarter of
fiscal year 2010, the Company noted that the version of the
software it used incorrectly calculated stock-based compensation
expense by continuing to apply a weighted average forfeiture
rate to the vested portion of stock option awards until the
grants final vest date, rather than reflecting actual
forfeitures as awards vested. The net effect of the error was an
understatement of stock-based compensation expense of
approximately $133, $492 and $538 in fiscal years 2007, 2008 and
2009, respectively.
Cash Flow
Presentation
The Company determined in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010
that in its statement of cash flows for fiscal year 2008, it had
improperly reflected an increase in liabilities resulting from
the recording of a deferred tax liability in connection with an
acquisition in operating activities instead of investing
activities.
The Company assessed the materiality of these errors on prior
period financial statements in accordance with the SECs
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99 (SAB 99),
and concluded that the errors were not material to any prior
annual or interim periods but the cumulative error would be
material to the three months ended September 30, 2009, if
the entire correction was recorded in that period. Accordingly,
the Company has revised certain prior amounts and balances in
its financial statements in fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 to
allow for the correct recording of these amounts in accordance
with the SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statement.
F-15
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
The following tables summarize the effect of the correction of
the immaterial errors on the Companys financial statements
for fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
As Revised
|
|
As Reported
|
|
As Revised
|
|
As Reported
|
|
As Revised
|
|
Consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
117,905
|
|
|
$
|
108,945
|
|
|
$
|
130,610
|
|
|
$
|
130,869
|
|
|
$
|
181,370
|
|
|
$
|
181,593
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
49,465
|
|
|
|
58,425
|
|
|
|
61,420
|
|
|
|
61,161
|
|
|
|
79,157
|
|
|
|
78,934
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
24,537
|
|
|
|
24,404
|
|
|
|
21,822
|
|
|
|
21,330
|
|
|
|
35,259
|
|
|
|
34,721
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
15,733
|
|
|
|
15,610
|
|
|
|
13,228
|
|
|
|
12,867
|
|
|
|
17,914
|
|
|
|
17,274
|
|
Net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated balance sheets at year end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
$
|
31,267
|
|
|
$
|
31,144
|
|
|
$
|
44,495
|
|
|
$
|
42,306
|
|
|
$
|
62,409
|
|
|
$
|
59,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
25,197
|
|
|
$
|
25,197
|
|
|
$
|
28,599
|
|
|
$
|
24,751
|
|
|
$
|
32,570
|
|
|
$
|
32,570
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(26,365
|
)
|
|
|
(26,365
|
)
|
|
|
(53,096
|
)
|
|
|
(49,248
|
)
|
|
|
(27,326
|
)
|
|
|
(27,326
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(2,803
|
)
|
|
|
(2,803
|
)
|
|
|
22,756
|
|
|
|
22,756
|
|
|
|
(5,012
|
)
|
|
|
(5,012
|
)
|
|
|
4.
|
Net
income attributable to common stockholders and pro forma net
income per share
|
Basic and diluted net income per share attributable to common
stockholders are presented in conformity with the two-class
method required for participating securities. Holders of
Series A, Series B and Series C convertible
preferred stock are each entitled to receive 8% per annum
non-cumulative dividends, payable prior and in preference to any
dividends on any other shares of the Companys capital
stock. In the event a dividend is paid on common stock,
Series A, Series B and Series C convertible
preferred stockholders are entitled to a proportionate share of
any such dividend as if they were holders of common shares (on
an as-if converted basis).
Under the two-class method, basic net income per share
attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the
net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Net income attributable to common stockholders is determined by
allocating undistributed earnings, calculated as net income less
current period Series A, Series B and Series C
convertible preferred stock non-cumulative dividends, between
common stock and Series A, Series B and Series C
convertible preferred stockholders. Diluted net income per share
attributable to common stockholders is computed by using the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding, including
potential dilutive shares of common stock assuming the dilutive
effect of outstanding stock options using the treasury stock
method.
F-16
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Pro forma basic and diluted net income per share were computed
to give effect to the conversion of the Series A,
Series B and Series C convertible preferred stock
using the as-if converted method into common stock as though the
conversion had occurred as of July 1, 2008 or the original
date of issuance or later.
The following table presents the calculation of basic and
diluted net income per share attributable to common stockholders
and pro forma basic and diluted net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,610
|
|
|
$
|
12,867
|
|
|
$
|
17,274
|
|
|
$
|
5,654
|
|
|
$
|
8,923
|
|
8% non-cumulative dividends on convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(3,276
|
)
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
Undistributed earnings allocated to convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(7,690
|
)
|
|
|
(5,925
|
)
|
|
|
(8,599
|
)
|
|
|
(2,468
|
)
|
|
|
(4,454
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders basic
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
3,666
|
|
|
$
|
5,399
|
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
$
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stockholders basic
|
|
$
|
4,644
|
|
|
$
|
3,666
|
|
|
$
|
5,399
|
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
$
|
2,831
|
|
Undistributed earnings re-allocated to common stock
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
diluted
|
|
$
|
5,166
|
|
|
$
|
4,026
|
|
|
$
|
5,798
|
|
|
$
|
1,672
|
|
|
$
|
3,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares used in computing basic net
income per share
|
|
|
12,789
|
|
|
|
13,104
|
|
|
|
13,294
|
|
|
|
13,282
|
|
|
|
13,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares used in computing basic net
income per share
|
|
|
12,789
|
|
|
|
13,104
|
|
|
|
13,294
|
|
|
|
13,282
|
|
|
|
13,463
|
|
Add weighted average effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
2,221
|
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
|
|
1,821
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares used in computing diluted net
income per share
|
|
|
15,263
|
|
|
|
15,325
|
|
|
|
14,971
|
|
|
|
15,103
|
|
|
|
16,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing pro forma net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares from above
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,463
|
|
Add assumed conversion of convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing pro forma basic net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares from above
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,169
|
|
Add conversion of Series A, Series B, and
Series C convertible preferred stock excluded under the two
class method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share used in computing pro forma diluted net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
5.
|
Balance
Sheet Components
|
Marketable
Securities
The Companys investments in marketable securities
designated as
available-for-sale
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
$
|
2,296
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities
|
|
$
|
2,296
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognized proceeds of $29,172 and $2,302 from the
sale and maturities of its investments in marketable securities
for fiscal years 2008 and 2009, respectively. The Company did
not realize any gains or losses from sales of its investments in
marketable securities for fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Fair
Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the
exit price) in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. A hierarchy for inputs
used in measuring fair value has been defined to minimize the
use of unobservable inputs by requiring the use of observable
market data when available. Observable inputs are inputs that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability
based on active market data. Unobservable inputs are inputs that
reflect the Companys assumptions about the assumptions
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability
based on the best information available in the circumstances.
The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad
levels:
Level 1 Inputs are unadjusted quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Inputs are quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that
are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the
full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 Inputs are unobservable inputs
based on the Companys assumptions.
All cash equivalents at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2009 (unaudited) are considered Level 1.
Accounts
Receivable, Net
Accounts receivable, net balances consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
27,443
|
|
|
$
|
36,792
|
|
|
$
|
43,424
|
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(622
|
)
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
Less: Allowance for sales reserve
|
|
|
(1,540
|
)
|
|
|
(3,003
|
)
|
|
|
(2,969
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,281
|
|
|
$
|
33,283
|
|
|
$
|
40,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Property
and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment, net balances are comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$
|
9,670
|
|
|
$
|
10,295
|
|
|
$
|
10,753
|
|
Software
|
|
|
4,512
|
|
|
|
4,955
|
|
|
|
5,191
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
Internal software development costs
|
|
|
12,396
|
|
|
|
13,456
|
|
|
|
14,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,959
|
|
|
|
31,392
|
|
|
|
32,760
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(23,234
|
)
|
|
|
(26,651
|
)
|
|
|
(27,947
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,725
|
|
|
$
|
4,741
|
|
|
$
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $3,135, $2,400 and $2,742 for fiscal
years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively; and $1,092 and $1,041
for the six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2009
(unaudited), respectively. Amortization expense related to
internal software development costs was $1,965, $1,816 and
$1,500 for fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and
$865 and $601 for the six months ended December 31, 2008
and 2009 (unaudited), respectively.
Intangible
Assets, Net
Intangible assets excluding goodwill, net balances consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer/publisher relationships
|
|
$
|
18,789
|
|
|
$
|
(2,046
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,743
|
|
|
$
|
22,982
|
|
|
$
|
(6,299
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,683
|
|
|
$
|
26,678
|
|
|
$
|
(8,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,434
|
|
Content
|
|
|
15,467
|
|
|
|
(6,530
|
)
|
|
|
8,937
|
|
|
|
18,145
|
|
|
|
(10,546
|
)
|
|
|
7,599
|
|
|
|
29,590
|
|
|
|
(13,426
|
)
|
|
|
16,164
|
|
Website/trade/domain names
|
|
|
6,216
|
|
|
|
(2,446
|
)
|
|
|
3,770
|
|
|
|
9,187
|
|
|
|
(2,988
|
)
|
|
|
6,199
|
|
|
|
14,897
|
|
|
|
(3,870
|
)
|
|
|
11,027
|
|
Acquired technology and other
|
|
|
9,286
|
|
|
|
(3,910
|
)
|
|
|
5,376
|
|
|
|
10,034
|
|
|
|
(6,525
|
)
|
|
|
3,509
|
|
|
|
11,370
|
|
|
|
(7,779
|
)
|
|
|
3,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
49,758
|
|
|
$
|
(14,932
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,826
|
|
|
$
|
60,348
|
|
|
$
|
(26,358
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,990
|
|
|
$
|
82,535
|
|
|
$
|
(33,319
|
)
|
|
$
|
49,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets was $4,537, $7,511 and $11,736
for fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively; and $6,394
and $6,961 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 and
2009 (unaudited), respectively.
F-19
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Amortization expense for the Companys acquisition-related
intangible assets as of June 30, 2009 for each of the next
five years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
12,137
|
|
2011
|
|
|
9,402
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,553
|
|
2013
|
|
|
4,057
|
|
2014
|
|
|
921
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for fiscal years
2007, 2008 and 2009 and for the six months ended
December 31, 2009 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DMS
|
|
|
DSS
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
23,320
|
|
|
$
|
1,231
|
|
|
$
|
24,551
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
55,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
79,237
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
80,468
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
26,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
105,513
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
106,744
|
|
Additions (unaudited)
|
|
|
32,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
$
|
138,082
|
|
|
$
|
1,231
|
|
|
$
|
139,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, and for the six months
ended December 31, 2009 (unaudited), the additions to
goodwill relate to the Companys acquisitions as described
in Note 6, and primarily reflect the value of the synergies
expected to be generated from combining the Companys
technology and know-how with the acquired entities access
to online visitors.
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Accrued media costs
|
|
$
|
7,943
|
|
|
$
|
12,920
|
|
|
$
|
13,352
|
|
Accrued compensation and related expenses
|
|
|
5,286
|
|
|
|
6,457
|
|
|
|
5,877
|
|
Accrued taxes payable
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
Accrued professional service and other business expenses
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
3,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
19,571
|
|
|
$
|
21,794
|
|
|
$
|
23,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Acquisition
of Internet.com (unaudited)
On November 30, 2009, the Company acquired the website
business of Internet.com, a division of WebMediaBrands, Inc., in
exchange for $16,000 in cash paid upon closing of the
acquisition and the issuance of a $2,000 non-interest-bearing
promissory note payable in one installment. The results of
Internet.coms operations have been included in the
consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date.
The Company acquired Internet.com to broaden its media access
and client base in the business-to-business market. The total
purchase price recorded was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
|
Fair value of debt (net of $46 of imputed interest)
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business
combination. The Company allocated the purchase price to
tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and identifiable
intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values.
The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair values
was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill is deductible for tax
purposes. The following table summarizes the preliminary
allocation of the purchase price and the estimated useful lives
of the identifiable intangible assets acquired as of the date of
the acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Tangible assets acquired
|
|
$
|
2,663
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
7 years
|
Trade name and domain name
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
5 years
|
Content
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
4 years
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
7,025
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Insure.com
On October 8, 2009, the Company acquired the website
business Insure.com from Life Quotes, Inc. , in exchange for
$15,000 in cash paid upon closing of the acquisition and the
issuance of a $1,000 non-interest-bearing promissory note
payable in one installment. The results of Insure.coms
acquired operations have been included in the consolidated
financial statements since the acquisition date. The Company
acquired Insure.com for its capacity to generate online visitors
in the financial services market. The total purchase price
recorded was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
Fair value of debt (net of $24 of imputed interest)
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business
combination. The Company allocated the purchase price to
identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their estimated
fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate
fair values was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill is deductible
for tax
F-21
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
purposes. The following table summarizes the preliminary
allocation of the purchase price and the estimated useful lives
of the identifiable intangible assets acquired as of the date of
the acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Advertiser relationships
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
3 years
|
Trade name
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
8 years
|
Content
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
8 years
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
9,926
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Payler Corp D/B/A HSH Associates Financial Publishers
(HSH) (unaudited)
On September 14, 2009, the Company acquired 100% of the
outstanding shares of HSH, a New Jersey-based online marketing
business, in exchange for $6,000 in cash paid upon closing of
the acquisition and the issuance of $4,000 in
non-interest-bearing promissory notes payable in five
installments over the next five years. The results of HSHs
acquired operations have been included in the consolidated
financial statements since the acquisition date. The Company
acquired HSH for its capacity to generate online visitors in the
financial services market. The total purchase price recorded was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
6,000
|
|
Fair value of debt (net of $241 of imputed interest)
|
|
|
3,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business
combination. The Company allocated the purchase price to
tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and identifiable
intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values.
The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair values
was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill is not deductible for tax
purposes. The following table summarizes the allocation of the
purchase price and the estimated useful lives of the
identifiable intangible assets acquired as of the date of the
acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Tangible assets acquired
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(1,696
|
)
|
|
|
Advertiser relationships
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
3 years
|
Trade name
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
6 years
|
Content
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
6 years
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
8,105
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of U.S. Citizens for Fair Credit Card Terms, Inc.
(CardRatings)
On August 5, 2008, the Company acquired 100% of the
outstanding shares of CardRatings, an Arkansas-based online
marketing company, in exchange for $10,000 in cash paid upon
closing of the acquisition and the issuance of $5,000 in
non-interest-bearing promissory notes payable in five
installments over the next five years, secured by the assets
acquired. The Company paid $372 in working capital adjustment
following the closing of the acquisition. The results of
CardRatings acquired operations have been included in the
consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date.
The Company acquired CardRatings for its
F-22
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
capacity to generate online visitors in the financial services
market. The total purchase price recorded was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
10,372
|
|
Fair value of debt (net of $722 of imputed interest)
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business
combination. The Company allocated the purchase price to
tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and identifiable
intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values.
The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair values
was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill is entirely deductible
for tax purposes. The following table summarizes the allocation
of the purchase price and the estimated useful lives of the
identifiable intangible assets acquired as of the date of the
acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Tangible assets acquired
|
|
$
|
834
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
Advertiser relationships
|
|
|
2,325
|
|
|
7 years
|
Trade name
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
5 years
|
Noncompete agreements
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
3 years
|
Content
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
2 years
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
10,677
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Cyberspace Communications Corporation
(SureHits)
On April 9, 2008, the Company acquired 100% of the
outstanding shares of SureHits, an Oklahoma-based online
marketing company, in exchange for $26,519 in cash paid upon
closing of the acquisition and $1,913 payable in two equal
installments over the next year related to employee
change-in-control
provisions. Additionally, the sellers have the potential to earn
up to an additional $18,000 over the subsequent 45 months,
such earn-out amounts being contingent upon the achievement of
specified financial targets. The results of SureHits
operations have been included in the consolidated financial
statements since the acquisition date. The Company acquired
SureHits to broaden its media access and client base in the
financial services market. The total purchase price recorded was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
26,519
|
|
Fair value of debt (net of $72 of imputed interest)
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business
combination. The Company allocated the purchase price to
tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and identifiable
intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values.
The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair values
was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill is entirely deductible
for tax purposes. The following table summarizes the allocation
of the purchase price and the estimated useful lives of the
identifiable intangible assets acquired as of the date of the
acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Tangible assets acquired
|
|
$
|
4,006
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(2,998
|
)
|
|
|
Advertiser relationships
|
|
|
7,692
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
Acquired technology
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
|
3 years
|
Publisher relationships
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
2 years
|
Trade name
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
5 years
|
Noncompete agreements
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
3 years
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
16,624
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal year 2009, the Company paid $4,500 in earnout payments
upon the achievement of the specified financial targets. The
earnout payments were recorded as goodwill.
Acquisition
of ReliableRemodeler.com, Inc.
(ReliableRemodeler)
On February 7, 2008, the Company acquired 100% of the
outstanding shares of ReliableRemodeler, an Oregon-based online
company specializing in home renovation and contractor
referrals, in exchange for $17,500 in cash paid upon closing of
the acquisition, $2,000 of which was placed in escrow, and the
issuance of $8,000 in non-interest-bearing, unsecured promissory
notes payable in three installments over the next four years.
The results of ReliableRemodelers acquired operations have
been included in the consolidated financial statements since the
acquisition date. The Company acquired ReliableRemodeler to
broaden its media access and client base in the home services
market. The total purchase price recorded was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
17,500
|
|
Fair value of debt (net of $1,277 of imputed interest)
|
|
|
6,723
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business
combination. The Company allocated the purchase price to
tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and identifiable
intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values.
The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair values
was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill is not deductible for tax
purposes. The following table summarizes the allocation of the
purchase price and the estimated useful lives of the
identifiable intangible assets acquired as of the date of the
acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Tangible assets acquired
|
|
$
|
859
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(987
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(3,849
|
)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
7,476
|
|
|
5 years
|
Acquired technology
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
5 years
|
Trade name and domain name
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
5 years
|
Content
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
4 years
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
18,657
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Vendorseek L.L.C. (Vendorseek)
On May 15, 2008, the Company acquired the assets of
Vendorseek, a New Jersey-based provider of online matching
services for businesses that connect Internet visitors with
vendors, in exchange for $10,665 in cash paid upon closing of
the acquisition and the issuance of $3,750 in interest-bearing,
unsecured promissory notes payable in three installments over
the next three years at an annual interest rate of 1.64%. The
results of Vendorseeks operations have been included in
the consolidated financial statements since the acquisition
date. The Company acquired Vendorseek to broaden its media
access and client base in the
business-to-business
market. The total purchase price recorded was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
10,665
|
|
Fair value of debt (net of $346 of imputed interest)
|
|
|
3,404
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business
combination. The Company allocated the purchase price to
tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and identifiable
intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values.
The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair values
was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill is deductible for tax
purposes. The following table summarizes the allocation of the
purchase price and the estimated useful lives of the
identifiable intangible assets acquired as of the date of the
acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Tangible assets acquired
|
|
$
|
413
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
2 years
|
Publisher relationships
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
5 years
|
Acquired technology
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
3 years
|
Trade name and domain name
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
5 years
|
Noncompete agreements
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
3 years
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
11,971
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Acquisitions
During the six months ended December 31, 2009 (unaudited),
in addition to the acquisition of HSH, Insure.com and
Internet.com, the Company acquired operations from 19 other
online publishing businesses in exchange for $7,656 in cash paid
upon closing of the acquisitions and $4,080 payable in the form
of non-interest-bearing, unsecured promissory notes payable over
a period of time ranging from one to five years. The aggregate
purchase price recorded was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
7,656
|
|
Fair value of debt (net of $285 of imputed interest)
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisitions were accounted for as purchase business
combinations. In each of the acquisitions, the Company allocated
the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets acquired
based on their estimated fair values and liabilities assumed, if
any. The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair
values of the identifiable intangible assets was recorded as
goodwill. Goodwill deductible for tax purposes is $6,524. The
following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase prices
of these other acquisitions during the six months ended
December 31, 2009 (unaudited) and the estimated useful life
of the identifiable intangible assets acquired as of the
respective dates of these acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Assets assumed
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
Content
|
|
|
2,309
|
|
|
1-6 years
|
Customer/publisher relationships
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
1-7 years
|
Domain names
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
5 years
|
Noncompete agreements
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
2-3 years
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
7,513
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
During fiscal year 2009, in addition to the acquisition of
CardRatings, the Company acquired operations from 33 other
online publishing businesses in exchange for $14,606 in cash
paid upon closing of the acquisitions and $4,268 payable
primarily in the form of non-interest-bearing, unsecured
promissory notes payable over a period of time ranging from one
to five years. The aggregate purchase price recorded was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
14,606
|
|
Fair value of debt (net of $395 of imputed interest)
|
|
|
3,873
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisitions were accounted for as purchase business
combinations. In each of the acquisitions, the Company allocated
the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets acquired
based on their estimated fair values and liabilities assumed, if
any. No tangible assets were acquired. The excess of the
purchase price over the aggregate fair values of the
identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The
goodwill is entirely deductible for tax purposes. The following
table summarizes the allocation of the purchase prices of these
other fiscal year 2009 acquisitions and the estimated useful
life of the identifiable intangible assets acquired as of the
respective dates of these acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
Content
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
1-6 years
|
Customer/publisher relationships
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
1-7 years
|
Domain names
|
|
|
2,418
|
|
|
5 years
|
Noncompete agreements
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
5 years
|
Acquired technology
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
3 years
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
11,099
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fiscal year 2008, in addition to the acquisitions of
SureHits, ReliableRemodeler and Vendorseek, the Company acquired
operations from 20 other online publishing entities in exchange
for $9,471 in cash paid upon closing of the acquisitions and
$5,354 payable primarily in the form of non-interest-bearing
promissory notes payable over a period of time ranging from one
to three years, the majority of which are secured by the assets
acquired. The aggregate purchase price recorded was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
9,471
|
|
Fair value of debt (net of $412 of imputed interest)
|
|
|
4,942
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
The acquisitions were accounted for as purchase business
combinations. In each of the acquisitions, the Company allocated
the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets acquired
based on their estimated fair values and liabilities assumed, if
any. No tangible assets were acquired nor were any liabilities
assumed. The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate
fair values of the identifiable intangible assets was recorded
as goodwill. The goodwill is entirely deductible for tax
purposes. The following table summarizes the allocation of the
purchase prices of these other fiscal year 2008 acquisitions and
the estimated useful lives of the identifiable intangible assets
acquired as of the respective dates of these acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Content
|
|
$
|
3,281
|
|
|
2-5 years
|
Customer/advertiser/publisher relationships
|
|
|
918
|
|
|
2-5 years
|
Domain names
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
5 years
|
Noncompete agreements
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
2-3.5 years
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
8,665
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
Forma Financial Information (unaudited)
The unaudited pro forma financial information in the table below
summarizes the combined results of operations for the Company
and other companies that were acquired since the beginning of
fiscal year 2009 (which were collectively significant for
purposes of unaudited pro forma financial information
disclosure) as though the companies were combined as of the
beginning of fiscal year 2008. The pro forma financial
information for all periods presented also includes the business
combination accounting effects resulting from these acquisitions
including amortization charges from acquired intangible assets
and the related tax effects as though the aforementioned
companies were combined as of the beginning of fiscal year 2008.
The pro forma financial information as presented below is for
informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results
of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisitions
had taken place at the beginning of fiscal year 2008.
The unaudited pro forma financial information was as follows for
fiscal years 2008 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
198,478
|
|
|
$
|
263,397
|
|
|
$
|
133,822
|
|
|
$
|
162,759
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
10,232
|
|
|
|
15,111
|
|
|
|
5,445
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Promissory
Notes
During fiscal years 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended
December 31, 2009 (unaudited), the Company issued total
promissory notes for the acquisition of businesses of $16,910,
$8,151 and $10,484, respectively, net of imputed interest
amounts of $2,107, $1,117 and $596, respectively. Other than for
one acquisition in fiscal year 2008 in which $3,750 in
promissory notes were issued at an annual interest rate of
1.64%, all of the promissory notes are non-interest-bearing.
Interest was imputed such that the notes carry an interest rate
F-28
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
commensurate with that available to the Company in the market
for similar debt instruments. Accretion of notes payable of
$421, $404 and $563 was recorded during the fiscal years 2007,
2008 and 2009, respectively. Certain of the promissory notes are
secured by the assets acquired in respect to which the notes
were issued.
Term
Loan and Revolving Credit Facility
In August 2006, the Company signed a loan and security agreement
that made available a $30,000 revolving credit facility from a
financial institution. In January 2008, the Company signed an
amendment to this loan and security agreement, expanding the
revolving credit availability to $60,000.
In September 2008, the Company replaced its existing revolving
credit facility of $60,000 with credit facilities totaling
$100,000. The new facilities consist of a $30,000 five-year term
loan, with principal amortization of 10%, 10%, 20%, 25% and 35%
annually, and a $70,000 revolving credit facility.
In November 2009, the Company entered into an amendment of its
existing credit facility pursuant to which the Companys
lenders agreed to increase the maximum amount available under
the Companys revolving credit facility from $70,000 to
$100,000.
Borrowings under the credit facilities are collateralized by the
Companys assets and interest is payable quarterly at
specified margins above either LIBOR or the Prime Rate. The
interest rate varies dependent upon the ratio of funded debt to
adjusted EBITDA and ranges from LIBOR + 1.875% to 2.625% or
Prime + 0.75% to 1.25% for the revolving credit facility and
from LIBOR + 2.25% to 3.0% or Prime + 0.75% to 1.25% for the
term loan. The revolver also requires a quarterly facility fee
of $66. As of June 30, 2009, $28,500 was outstanding under
the term loan and $6,257 was outstanding under the revolving
credit facility. The credit facilities expire in September 2013.
The loan and revolving credit facility agreement restricts the
Companys ability to raise additional debt financing and
pay dividends. In addition, the Company is required to maintain
financial ratios computed as follows:
1. Quick ratio: ratio of (i) the sum of unrestricted
cash and cash equivalents and trade receivables less than
90 days from invoice date to (ii) current liabilities
and face amount of any letters of credit less the current
portion of deferred revenue.
2. Fixed charge coverage: ratio of (i) trailing
12 months of adjusted EBITDA to (ii) the sum of
capital expenditures, net cash interest expense, cash taxes,
cash dividends and trailing twelve months payments of
indebtedness. Payment of unsecured indebtedness is excluded to
the degree that sufficient unused revolving credit facility
exists such that the relevant debt payment could have been made
from the credit facility.
3. Funded debt to adjusted EBITDA: ratio of (i) the
sum of all obligations owed to lending institutions, the face
amount of any letters of credit, indebtedness owed in connection
with acquisition-related notes and indebtedness owed in
connection with capital lease obligations to (ii) trailing
12-month adjusted EBITDA.
The Company was in compliance with the financial ratios as of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009 (unaudited).
F-29
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Debt
Maturities
The maturities of debt at June 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
Year Ending June 30,
|
|
Payable
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
10,214
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
8,215
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,790
|
|
|
|
6,750
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,330
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
11,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,069
|
|
|
|
34,757
|
|
Less: imputed interest and unamortized discounts
|
|
|
(1,850
|
)
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(10,085
|
)
|
|
|
(2,805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent portion of debt
|
|
$
|
13,134
|
|
|
$
|
31,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters
of Credit
The Company has a $500 letter of credit agreement with a
financial institution that is used as collateral for fidelity
bonds placed with an insurance company. The letter of credit
automatically renews annually in September without amendment
unless cancelled by the financial institution within
30 days of the annual expiration date.
The Company also has a $223 letter of credit agreement with a
financial institution that is used as collateral for the
Companys corporate headquarters operating lease. The
letter of credit automatically renews annually in December
without amendment unless cancelled by the financial institution
within 30 days of the annual expiration date.
|
|
8.
|
Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
Convertible preferred shares at June 30, 2008 and 2009 and
at December 31, 2009 (unaudited) consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount at
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
Series
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Issuance Costs
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
11,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,735,512
|
|
|
$
|
16,762
|
|
|
$
|
9,047
|
|
B
|
|
|
10,200,000
|
|
|
|
9,941,021
|
|
|
|
51,848
|
|
|
|
28,563
|
|
C
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
Undesignated
|
|
|
13,800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,500,000
|
|
|
|
21,176,533
|
|
|
$
|
71,110
|
|
|
$
|
38,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The holders of convertible preferred stock have various rights
and preferences as follows:
Voting
Each share of Series A and B convertible preferred stock
has voting rights equal to the number of shares of common stock
into which it is convertible and votes together as one class
with the common stock. The Series C convertible preferred
stock is non-voting.
F-30
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Dividends
Holders of Series A, B and C convertible preferred stock
are entitled to receive noncumulative dividends at the per annum
rate of 8% of original issue price or $0.136, $0.236 and $0.40
per share, respectively, when and if declared by the Board of
Directors. The holders of Series A, B and C convertible
preferred stock are also entitled to participate in dividends on
shares of common stock, when and if declared by the Board of
Directors, based on the number of shares of common stock held on
an as-if converted basis. No dividends on convertible preferred
stock or common stock have been declared by the Board from
inception through December 31, 2009.
Liquidation
In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of
the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, the holders of
the convertible preferred stock then outstanding shall be
entitled to be paid out of the assets of the Company available
for distribution to its stockholders, before any payment shall
be made in respect to the common stock, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For Series A and B convertible preferred stock, an amount
equal to the sum of (i) the original issue price of the
respective shares of preferred stock plus (ii) an amount
equal to 8% per annum of the original issue price of the
respective shares of preferred stock less (iii) any such
dividends, if declared and paid, to and through the date of full
payment.
|
|
|
|
For Series C convertible preferred stock, an amount equal
to the sum of (i) the original issue price of the shares of
preferred stock plus (ii) any declared and unpaid dividends.
|
Such liquidation payments shall be tendered to the holders of
the respective preferred shares with respect to such
liquidation, dissolution or winding up, and these respective
holders shall not be entitled to any further payment.
In the event of any merger, acquisition or consolidation of the
Company that results in the exchange of outstanding shares of
the Company for securities or other consideration (a
Merger Transaction), before any payment of any
amount shall be made in respect of the Series A convertible
preferred stock and the common stock, the holders of
Series B and Series C convertible preferred stock then
outstanding shall be entitled to be paid out of the assets of
the Company available for distribution to its stockholders as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For Series B convertible preferred stock, an amount equal
to 1.75 times the original issue price of the shares of
preferred stock, or $5.16 per share, plus any declared and
unpaid dividends.
|
|
|
|
For Series C convertible preferred stock, an amount equal
to the original issue price of $5.00 per share plus any declared
and unpaid dividends.
|
The holders of Series A convertible preferred stock then
outstanding shall then be entitled to be paid out of the assets
of the Company available for distribution to its stockholders,
before any payment shall be made in respect of the common stock,
an amount equal to the sum of (i) the Series A
original issue price of $1.70 per share plus (ii) an amount
equal to 8% of the Series A original issue price per annum
(iii) less any unpaid dividends, if declared and paid, to
and through the date of full payment. Such liquidation payments
shall be tendered to the holders of the respective preferred
stock, effective upon the closing of such Merger Transaction,
and these respective holders shall not be entitled to any
further payment.
If, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the
Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, or Merger Transaction
the assets to be distributed to the holders of any series of
preferred stock shall be insufficient to permit the payment to
such stockholders of the full preferential amounts aforesaid,
then all of
F-31
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
the assets of the Company shall be distributed ratably to the
holders of such series on the basis of the full liquidation
preference payable with respect to such series as if such
liquidation preference was paid in full.
These liquidation features cause the convertible preferred stock
to be classified as mezzanine capital rather than as a component
of stockholders equity.
Conversion
Each share of Series A, B and C convertible preferred stock
is convertible, at the option of the holder, into the number of
fully paid and nonassessable shares of common stock that results
from dividing the conversion price per share in effect for the
preferred stock at the time of conversion into the per share
conversion value of such shares subject to adjustment for
dilution. Conversion is automatic if at any time the Company
completes a qualified initial public offering consisting of
gross proceeds to the Company in excess of $25 million and
a public offering price equal to or exceeding $5.90 per share or
if the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Series A, B and C preferred stock give consent in writing
to the conversion into common stock.
At December 31, 2009, the effective conversion ratio was
one-to-one for Series A, B and C convertible preferred
stock.
Redemption
The redemption rights for the Series A, Series B and
Series C convertible preferred stock have expired. As a
result, the Company recorded no accretion for fiscal years 2008
or 2009 or the six months ended December 31, 2009.
The Companys Certificate of Incorporation, as amended,
authorizes the Company to issue 50,500,000 common shares.
The Company had reserved common stock for the following as of
June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Stock option plans
|
|
|
10,891,100
|
|
Conversion of Series A convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
10,735,512
|
|
Conversion of Series B convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
9,941,021
|
|
Conversion of Series C convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,067,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
For fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, the Company recorded
stock-based compensation expense of $2,071, $3,222 and $6,173,
respectively, resulting in the recognition of related excess tax
benefits $415, $1,707 and $474, respectively. For the six months
ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Company recorded
stock-based compensation expense of $2,910 and $7,093
respectively (unaudited), resulting in the recognition of $251
and $1,301 in related excess tax benefits, respectively.
The Company included as part of cash flows from financing
activities a gross benefit of tax deductions of $415, $1,707 and
$474 in fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and $251
and $1,372 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 and
2009, respectively (unaudited), related to stock-based
compensation in
F-32
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
excess of the grant date fair value of the related stock-based
awards for the options exercised during fiscal years 2008 and
2009. These amounts are shown as a reduction of cash flows from
operating activities and correspondingly an increase to cash
flows from financing activities.
Equity
Stock Incentive Plan
On January 2008, the Company adopted the 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan (the 2008 Plan). The 2008 Plan amended and
restated the Companys 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (the
1999 Plan). All outstanding stock awards granted
before the adoption of the amendment and restatement of the 1999
Plan continue to be governed by the terms of the 1999 Plan. All
stock awards granted after January 2008 are governed by the 2008
Plan.
The Companys 2008 Plan permits the grant of stock options
or restricted stock awards to its employees, non-employee
directors, and consultants. Under the 2008 Plan, the Company may
issue incentive stock options (ISOs) only to its
employees. Non-qualified stock options (NQSOs) and
restricted stock awards may be issued to employees, non-employee
directors, and consultants. ISOs and NQSOs are generally granted
to employees with an exercise price equal to the market price of
the Companys common stock at the date of grant, as
determined by the Companys Board of Directors.
The absence of an active market for the Companys common
stock required the Companys Board of Directors, with input
from management, to estimate the fair value of the common stock
for purposes of granting options and for determining stock-based
compensation expense for the periods presented. In response to
these requirements, the Companys Board of Directors
estimated the fair value of the common stock at each meeting at
which options were granted based on factors such as the price of
the most recent convertible preferred stock sales to investors,
the preferences held by the convertible preferred stock in favor
of common stock, the valuations of comparable companies, the
hiring of key personnel, the status of the Companys
development and sales efforts, revenue growth and additional
objectives, and subjective factors relating to the
Companys business. The Company has historically granted
options with an exercise price not less than the fair value of
the underlying common stock as determined at the time of grant
by the Companys Board of Directors.
While, consistent with the previous practice, the Company had
performed a contemporaneous valuation at the time of the
August 7, 2009 grant, it decided to reassess that valuation
for financial reporting purposes in light of the new facts and
circumstances of which it became aware prior to the issuance of
the September 30, 2009 quarterly results of operations,
namely, the acceleration of the Companys IPO plans and
additional data on expected valuation ranges for the IPO. Based
on the reassessment, management concluded that the fair value of
common stock for financial reporting purposes on August 7,
2009 (the date of grant for options to purchase
1,875,050 shares with exercise prices of $9.01 per
share and an option to purchase 87,705 shares with an
exercise price of $9.91 per share) was $13.93.
The Company also performed a contemporaneous valuation at the
time of the October 6, 2009 grant; and it decided to
reassess that valuation for financial reporting purposes in
light of the new facts and circumstances of which it became
aware prior to the issuance of December 31, 2009 quarterly
results of operations, namely, the acceleration of the
Companys IPO plans and additional data on expected
valuation ranges for the IPO. Based on the reassessment,
management concluded that the fair value of common stock for
financial reporting purposes on October 6, 2009 (the date
of grant for options to purchase 210,600 shares with
exercise prices of $11.08 per share) was $16.88.
To date, the Company has not granted any restricted stock
awards. Stock options generally have a contractual term of seven
years and generally vest over four years of continuous service,
with 25 percent of the stock options vesting on the first
anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining
75 percent vesting in equal monthly installments over the
36-month
period thereafter. NQSOs granted to non-employee directors
generally vest immediately on the date of grant. The vesting
periods, based on continuous service, for NQSOs granted to
consultants have varied.
F-33
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
The Companys 1999 Plan, which has expired, permitted the
grant of stock options or restricted stock awards to its
employees, non-employee directors, and consultants. Under the
1999 Plan, the Company issued ISOs only to its employees. NQSOs
were issued to employees, non-employee directors, and
consultants. ISOs were generally granted to employees with an
exercise price equal to the market price of the Companys
common stock at the date of grant, as determined by the
Companys Board of Directors. The Company had the ability,
if it chose, to grant NQSOs with an exercise price equal to
85 percent of the market price of the Companys common
stock at the date of grant but did not do so. Stock options
granted prior to May 31, 2007 generally have a contractual
term of ten years and stock options granted after May 31,
2007 generally expire seven years after the date of grant. Stock
options granted to employees generally vest over four years of
continuous service, with 25 percent of the stock options
vesting on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and the
remaining 75 percent vesting in equal monthly installments
over the
36-month
period thereafter. NQSOs granted to non-employee directors
vested immediately on the date of grant. The vesting period,
based on continuous service, for NQSOs granted to consultants
have varied.
The Company expects to satisfy the exercise of vested stock
options by issuing new shares that are available for issuance
under both the 1999 and 2008 Plans. As of June 30, 2009,
the Company has reserved a maximum of 16,654,100 shares of
common stock for issuance under the 2008 and 1999 Plans, of
which shares available for issuance totaled 1,739,677. On
August 7, 2009, the Company increased the number of shares
of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2008 and the
1999 Plans to 18,356,000.
Valuation
Assumptions
For the years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and six
months ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, the fair value of
each stock option award to employees was estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the
following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
4.6 - 6.1
|
|
4.6
|
|
4.6
|
|
4.6
|
|
4.6
|
Weighted-average stock price volatility
|
|
48%
|
|
52%
|
|
62%
|
|
60%
|
|
68%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.6% - 4.9%
|
|
2.8% - 4.5%
|
|
1.8% - 3.1%
|
|
2.18% - 3.11%
|
|
2.25% - 2.47%
|
As the Company has limited historical option exercise data, the
expected term of the stock options granted to employees under
the Plan was calculated based on the simplified method as
permitted by Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
No. 107, Share-Based Payment. Under the simplified method,
the expected term is equal to the average of an options
weighted-average vesting period and its contractual term.
Pursuant to SAB 110, the Company is permitted to continue
using the simplified method until sufficient information
regarding exercise behavior, such as historical exercise data or
exercise information from external sources, becomes available.
The Company estimates the expected volatility of its common
stock on the date of grant based on the average volatilities of
similar publicly-traded entities. The Company has no history or
expectation of paying cash dividends on its common stock. The
risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield
for a term consistent with the expected life of the options in
effect at the time of grant.
F-34
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Stock
Option Award Activity
A summary of stock option activity under the Plans for fiscal
years 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended December 31,
2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life (in Years)
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2007
|
|
|
8,279,468
|
|
|
$
|
6.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
1,315,400
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(893,197
|
)
|
|
|
2.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(784,959
|
)
|
|
|
9.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired
|
|
|
(122,301
|
)
|
|
|
7.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
7,794,411
|
|
|
$
|
7.24
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
2,575,100
|
|
|
|
10.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(169,716
|
)
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(656,610
|
)
|
|
|
9.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired
|
|
|
(391,762
|
)
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
9,151,423
|
|
|
$
|
7.87
|
|
|
|
5.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and
expected-to-vest
at June 30, 2009(1)
|
|
|
8,282,043
|
|
|
$
|
7.65
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
5,428,414
|
|
|
$
|
6.41
|
|
|
|
5.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
9,151,423
|
|
|
$
|
7.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted (unaudited)
|
|
|
3,253,855
|
|
|
|
12.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised (unaudited)
|
|
|
(500,516
|
)
|
|
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited (unaudited)
|
|
|
(261,395
|
)
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired (unaudited)
|
|
|
(138,600
|
)
|
|
|
9.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
|
11,504,767
|
|
|
$
|
9.34
|
|
|
|
5.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The
expected-to-vest
options are the result of applying the pre-vesting forfeiture
assumption to total outstanding options. |
The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options
granted was $4.76, $4.76, $5.28, $5.30 and $9.55 during fiscal
years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009 (unaudited), respectively. The
total intrinsic value of all options exercised during fiscal
years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009 (unaudited) was $2,840, $6,606,
$1,365, $900 and $5,906, respectively. Cash received from stock
option exercises for fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the
six months ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 (unaudited)
were $714, $2,575, $304, $240 and $1,252, respectively. The
actual tax benefit realized from stock options exercised during
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009 (unaudited) was $366, $1,734,
$544, $401 and $2,149, respectively.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009 (unaudited),
there was $18,993 and $41,557 of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to unvested stock options which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 2.43 years and
2.78 years, respectively.
F-35
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
Stock
Repurchases
In fiscal year 2008, the Company repurchased 558,730 shares
of its outstanding common stock at a total cost of $5,606 and an
average cost of $10.03 per share. In fiscal year 2009, the
Company repurchased, in aggregate, 163,275 shares of its
outstanding common stock at a total cost of $1,337 and an
average cost of $8.19 per share. In the six months ended
December 31, 2009 (unaudited), the Company repurchased
79,800 shares of its outstanding common stock at a total
cost of $715, and an average cost of $8.96 per share. Share
repurchases were accounted for as a reduction in additional
paid-in capital.
401(k)
Savings Plan
The Company sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering
all U.S. employees. Contributions made by the Company are
determined annually by the Board of Directors. There were no
employer contributions under this plan for the fiscal years
June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 or the six months ended
December 31, 2009.
The components of our income before income taxes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
US
|
|
$
|
23,914
|
|
|
$
|
20,299
|
|
|
$
|
30,806
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,438
|
|
|
$
|
21,743
|
|
|
$
|
31,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
9,043
|
|
|
$
|
9,856
|
|
|
$
|
14,018
|
|
State
|
|
|
1,914
|
|
|
|
2,437
|
|
|
|
3,808
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,432
|
|
|
$
|
12,648
|
|
|
$
|
17,990
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(1,484
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,109
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(698
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,604
|
)
|
|
|
(3,772
|
)
|
|
|
(4,081
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,828
|
|
|
$
|
8,876
|
|
|
$
|
13,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
A reconciliation between the statutory federal income tax and
the Companys effective tax rates as a percentage of income
before income taxes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Federal tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
States taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
38.6
|
%
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
|
|
44.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the current and long-term deferred tax assets,
net consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Reserves and accruals
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
3,155
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
Other
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
2,738
|
|
|
$
|
5,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
$
|
(1,433
|
)
|
|
$
|
(460
|
)
|
Net operating loss
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Stock options
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent deferred tax assets
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax assets, net
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets, net
|
|
$
|
2,985
|
|
|
$
|
7,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management periodically evaluates the realizability of the
deferred tax assets and recognizes the tax benefit only as
reassessment demonstrates that they are realizable. At such
time, if it is determined that it is more likely than not that
the deferred tax assets are realizable, the valuation allowance
will be adjusted. As of June 30, 2009, management believes
the U.S. deferred tax assets were realizable. Therefore, no
valuation allowance in the U.S. was deemed necessary. The
valuation allowance increased by $13 in fiscal year 2009 related
to higher foreign deferred tax assets.
The Companys Japanese subsidiary had net operating loss
carryforwards of $370 that will begin to expire in 2011.
Deferred tax assets related to those net operating loss
carryforwards were fully reserved as of June 30, 2009.
United States federal income taxes have not been provided for
the $377 of undistributed earnings of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009. The Companys
present intention is to not permanently
F-37
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
reinvest the undistributed earnings of its Canadian subsidiary
offshore. The Company would be subject to additional United
States taxes if these earnings were repatriated. Determination
of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability
related to these earnings is not material to the financial
statements.
Effective July 1, 2007, the Company adopted the accounting
guidance on uncertainties in income taxes. The cumulative effect
of adoption to the opening balance of retained earnings account
was $1,705. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts
of unrecognized tax benefits since the adoption of accounting
guidance on uncertainty in income taxes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 1
|
|
$
|
2,383
|
|
|
$
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross increases current period tax positions
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross decreases current period tax positions
|
|
|
(328
|
)
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions as a result of lapsed statute of limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30
|
|
$
|
2,248
|
|
|
$
|
2,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys policy is to include interest and penalties
related to unrecognized tax benefits within the Companys
provision for income taxes. Upon adoption, the Company had
accrued $75 for interest and penalties related to unrecognized
tax benefits. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has accrued
$442 for interest and penalties related to the unrecognized tax
benefits. The balance of unrecognized tax benefits and the
related interest and penalties is recorded as a noncurrent
liability on the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
As of June 30, 2009, unrecognized tax benefits of $2,617,
if recognized, would affect the Companys effective tax
rate. The Company does not anticipate that the amount of
existing unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase
or decrease within the next 12 months.
With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to
U.S. federal, state and local, or
non-U.S., income
tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2004. The
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) commenced an
examination of the Companys U.S. income tax return
for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 that is expected to
be completed during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010. In
addition, ReliableRemodeler, a wholly-owned subsidiary that was
acquired by the Company, is under audit by the IRS for tax year
2006. The audit is currently in progress with no estimated
completion date. The Company has also been contacted for a state
income tax audit for fiscal years 2007 and 2008. The audit is
expected to commence during the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2010. The Company believes it is entitled to partial or full
indemnification for losses attributable to such audit under the
ReliableRemodeler acquisition agreement. The Company files
income tax returns in the United States, various U.S. states and
certain foreign jurisdictions. As of June 30, 2009, the tax
years 2005 through 2009 remain open in the U.S., the tax years
2004 through 2009 remain open in the various state
jurisdictions, and the tax years 2003 through 2009 remain open
in the various foreign jurisdictions.
|
|
12.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Leases
The Company leases office space and equipment under
non-cancelable operating leases with various expiration dates
through September 2012. Rent expense for the fiscal years 2007,
2008 and 2009 was $1,691, $2,151 and $2,550, respectively, and
$1,225 and $1,671 for the six months ended December 31,
2008 and 2009 respectively. The terms of the facility leases
generally provide for rental payments on a graduated scale.
F-38
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis
over the lease period and has accrued for rent expense incurred
but not paid.
Future annual minimum lease payments under all noncancelable
operating leases as of June 30, 2009, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Year Ending June 30,
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,104
|
|
2011
|
|
|
242
|
|
2012
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The lease for the Companys corporate headquarters expires
in October 2010. The Company is presently considering renewing
this lease or seeking a lease for an alternate property.
Guarantor
Arrangements
The Company has agreements whereby it indemnifies its officers
and directors for certain events or occurrences while the
officer or director is, or was serving, at the Companys
request in such capacity. The term of the indemnification period
is for the officer or directors lifetime. The maximum
potential amount of future payments the Company could be
required to make under these indemnification agreements is
unlimited; however, the Company has a director and officer
insurance policy that limits its exposure and enables the
Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a
result of its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes
the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is
minimal. Accordingly, the Company had no liabilities recorded
for these agreements as of June 30, 2008 and 2009.
In the ordinary course of its business, the Company enters into
standard indemnification provisions in its agreements with its
customers. Pursuant to these provisions, the Company indemnifies
its customers for losses suffered or incurred in connection with
third-party claims that a Company product infringed upon any
United States patent, copyright or other intellectual property
rights. Where applicable, the Company generally limits such
infringement indemnities to those claims directed solely to its
products and not in combination with other software or products.
With respect to its DSS products, the Company also generally
reserves the right to resolve such claims by designing a
non-infringing alternative or by obtaining a license on
reasonable terms, and failing that, to terminate its
relationship with the customer. Subject to these limitations,
the term of such indemnity provisions is generally coterminous
with the corresponding agreements.
The potential amount of future payments to defend lawsuits or
settle indemnified claims under these indemnification provisions
is unlimited; however, the Company believes the estimated fair
value of these indemnity provisions is minimal, and accordingly,
the Company had no liabilities recorded for these agreements as
of June 30, 2008 and 2009.
During fiscal year 2009, the Company settled an indemnity
obligation with respect to one ongoing litigation matter. See
discussion below for further details.
Litigation
In August 2005, the Company was notified by one of its clients
that epicRealm Licensing, LLC (epicRealm LLC), a
non-operating patent holding company, had filed a lawsuit
against such client in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas alleging that certain web-based
services provided by the Company and others to such client
infringed patents held by epicRealm LLC.
F-39
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
In August 2006, the Company filed suit against epicRealm
Licensing LP (epicRealm LP) in the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
seeking to invalidate certain patents owned by epicRealm LP. In
April 2007, epicRealm LP filed counterclaims against the Company
alleging patent infringement. Parallel Networks, LLC was later
substituted for epicRealm LP as the patent holder and
party-in-interest.
In April 2009, the Company entered into a settlement and license
agreement (Agreement) with Parallel Networks
pertaining to the patents in question (Licensed
Patents). Under the terms of the Agreement, Parallel
Networks granted the Company a perpetual, royalty-free,
non-sublicensable and generally non-transferable, worldwide
right and license under the Licensed Patents: (i) to use
any product technology or service covered by or which embodies
any one or more claims of the Licensed Patents (as defined in
the Agreement); and (ii) to practice any method covered by
any one or more claims of the Licensed Patents in connection
with the activities in clause (i). Additionally, Parallel
Networks covenants not to sue the Company.
The Company paid Parallel Networks a one-time, non-refundable
fee of $850. The Company recognized an intangible asset of $226
related to the estimated fair value of the license and expensed
the remaining $624 as a settlement expense.
|
|
13.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Katrina Boydon serves as the Companys Vice President of
Content and Compliance and is the sister of Bronwyn Syiek, the
Companys President and Chief Operating Officer.
Ms. Boydons fiscal year 2010 base salary is $193 per
year, and she has a fiscal year 2010 target bonus of $67. In
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, Ms. Boydon received a
base salary of $140 (later increased to $158), $165 (later
increased to $175) and $184 per year, respectively, and a bonus
payout of $46, $45 and $51, respectively. In fiscal years 2007,
2008, 2009 and 2010, Ms. Boydon was granted options to
purchase an aggregate of 64,000, 20,000, 30,000 and
45,000 shares of the Companys common stock,
respectively.
Rian Valenti serves as a client sales and development associate
and is the son of Doug Valenti, the Companys Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman. Mr. Rian Valentis
fiscal year 2010 base salary is $54 per year, and he has a
fiscal year 2010 commission opportunity of $45. Mr. Rian
Valenti joined us in fiscal year 2009 with a base salary of $52.
In fiscal year 2009, Mr. Rian Valenti received an aggregate
of $2 in commissions. In fiscal year 2009, Mr. Rian Valenti
was granted an option to purchase an aggregate of
1,500 shares of the Companys common stock.
The Company had a preferred publisher agreement with Remilon, an
online publishing entity, one of whose primary owners is the
brother-in-law
of one of the Companys Executive Vice Presidents. Under
the preferred publisher agreement, the Company paid commissions
for qualified leads generated from links on Remilons
website. The Company paid commissions to Remilon for the fiscal
years June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009 of $3,109, $3,070, $4,204,
$1,946 and $2,226, respectively. Amounts payable to Remilon at
June 30, 2008 and 2009 were $489 and $721, respectively.
There were no amounts payable at December 31, 2009. This
contract expired in October 2009.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through
January 14, 2010. For the reissuance of these financial
statements, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through
February 2, 2010 (unaudited).
Option
Grants
On October 6, 2009, the Company issued options to purchase
220,660 shares of common stock with an exercise price of
$11.08 per share. While, consistent with the previous practice,
the Company had performed a
F-40
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
contemporaneous valuation at the time of the grant, in November
2009, it decided to reassess that valuation for financial
reporting purposes in light of the Companys acceleration
of its plans for a proposed IPO and additional data on expected
valuation ranges for the IPO. Based on the reassessment,
management concluded that the fair market value of the
Companys common stock at October 6, 2009 for
financial reporting purposes was $16.88. The Company will
recognize stock compensation expense for the October 2009 option
grants accordingly.
On November 17, 2009, the Company issued options to
purchase an additional 1,080,500 shares of common stock
with an exercise price of $19.00 per share, based on a
contemporaneous management valuation and the expected valuation
ranges for this offering at such time.
Acquisitions
after September 30, 2009
In October 2009, the Company acquired the website business of
Insure.com, an Illinois-based online marketing company, in
exchange for $15 million in cash paid upon closing of the
acquisition and a $1 million non-interest-bearing,
unsecured promissory note. The note is payable in one annual
installment. In November 2009, the Company acquired the website
assets of the Internet.com division of WebMediaBrands, Inc. for
$16.0 million in cash and a $2.0 million non-interest-bearing,
unsecured promissory note.
2010
Equity Incentive Plan
In November 2009, the Companys board of directors adopted
the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2010 Incentive
Plan), and the Company expects that its stockholders will
approve the 2010 Incentive Plan prior to the closing of this
offering. The 2010 Incentive Plan will become effective
immediately upon the signing of the underwriting agreement for
this offering. The 2010 Incentive Plan provides for the grant of
incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, restricted
stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, stock appreciation
rights, performance-based stock awards and other forms of equity
compensation. In addition, the 2010 Incentive Plan provides for
the grant of performance cash awards. Incentive stock options
may be granted only to employees. All other awards may be
granted to employees, including officers, nonemployee directors
and consultants.
2010
Non-Employee Directors Stock Award Plan
In November 2009, the Companys board of directors adopted
the 2010 Non-Employee Directors Stock Award Plan (the
Directors Plan) and the Company expects that
its stockholders will approve the Directors Plan prior to
the completion of this offering. The Directors Plan will
become effective immediately upon the signing of the
underwriting agreement for this offering. The Directors
Plan provides for the automatic grant of nonstatutory stock
options to purchase shares of our common stock to our
non-employee directors. The Directors Plan also provides
for the discretionary grant of restricted stock units.
Debt
On November 18, 2009, the Company entered into an amendment
of its existing credit facility pursuant to which the
Companys lenders agreed to increase the maximum amount
available under the Companys revolving credit facility
from $70.0 million to $100.0 million.
In January 2010, the Company replaced its existing credit
facility with a credit facility with a total borrowing capacity
of $175.0 million. The new facility consists of a
$35.0 million four-year term loan, with principal
amortization of 10%, 15%, 35% and 40% annually, and a
$140.0 million four-year revolving credit facility.
Borrowings under the credit facility are collateralized by the
Companys assets and interest is payable quarterly at
specified margins above either LIBOR or the Prime Rate. The
interest rate varies dependent upon
F-41
QUINSTREET,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
the ratio of funded debt to adjusted EBITDA and ranges from
LIBOR + 2.125% to 2.875% or Prime + 1.00% to 1.50% for the
revolving credit facility and from LIBOR + 2.50% to 3.25% or
Prime + 1.00% to 1.50% for the term loan. The revolver also
requires a quarterly facility fee of $131,000. The credit
facility expires in January 2014. The loan and revolving credit
facility agreement restricts the Companys ability to raise
additional debt financing and pay dividends. In addition, the
Company is required to maintain financial ratios computed as
follows:
1. Quick ratio: ratio of (i) the sum of unrestricted
cash and cash equivalents and trade receivables less than
90 days from invoice date to (ii) current liabilities
and face amount of any letters of credit less the current
portion of deferred revenue.
2. Fixed charge coverage: ratio of (i) trailing
12 months of Adjusted EBITDA to (ii) the sum of
capital expenditures, net cash interest expense, cash taxes,
cash dividends and trailing twelve months payments of
indebtedness. Payment of unsecured indebtedness is excluded to
the degree that sufficient unused revolving credit facility
exists such that the relevant debt payment could have been made
from the credit facility.
3. Funded debt to Adjusted EBITDA: ratio of (i) the
sum of all obligations owed to lending institutions, the face
amount of any letters of credit, indebtedness owed in connection
with acquisition related notes and indebtedness owed in
connection with capital lease obligations to (ii) trailing
12-month
Adjusted EBITDA.
Reincorporation
in Delaware
In December 2009, the Company reincorporated in Delaware and, in
connection therewith, increased its authorized number of shares
of common and preferred stock 50,500,000 and 35,500,000,
respectively, and established the par value of each share of
common and preferred stock to be $0.001. In connection with the
reincorporation, the previously outstanding
5,367,756 shares of Series A convertible preferred
stock were converted on a two-for-one basis into
10,735,512 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock
of the reincorporated company. Conversion and liquidation rights
of Series A convertible preferred stock were adjusted
consistent with the conversion. In connection with the
reincorporation, common stock and additional paid-in capital
amounts in these financial statements have been adjusted to
reflect the par value of common stock shares. All share
information included in these financial statements, including
Notes 8 and 9, has been adjusted to reflect this reincorporation
and the increase of the number of Series A convertible
preferred stock.
F-42
10,000,000 Shares
QuinStreet,
Inc.
Common
Stock
PROSPECTUS
|
|
|
Credit
Suisse |
BofA Merrill Lynch |
J.P. Morgan |